Cochlear Implant Atlas
CI Atlas · Was It Worth It? Measuring Quality of Life and the Cost of an Implant · Module 10

10The Strongest Case: Cost-Effectiveness in Children

Test standfirst sentence one. Test sentence two for the intro paragraph here.

TA

Fact one 12847. Fact two 0.46.[2000]

TB

Fact one 5197. Fact two 9029.[2009]

Same gain, a lifetime apart: child vs adult

0.000.250.500.751.00Child (~70 yr)18QALYsAdult (~20 yr)5QALYsremaining years →remaining years →
Child cost / QALY1.6kAdult cost / QALY5.8k

Both recipients enjoy the same jump in health utility, but the child sustains it over roughly 70 years against the adult’s 20. The same utility gain multiplied by far more remaining life-years makes the child’s green area — the QALYs gained — several times larger. Because the device costs much the same either way, dividing that fixed cost by the bigger area gives paediatric implantation the lowest cost per QALY. Drag the gain to see both areas scale together. Illustrative.

CC

Fact one 75. Fact two 142000.[2009]

Case 20.10 · The Strongest Case
V.

Q?

Self-assessment — Module 102 questions
Question 1

S1?

Question 2

S2?

Tracked locally in your browser — see /progress for the dashboard.