1The test battery & the cross-check principle
Before anyone decides whether a person should have a cochlear implant, someone has to measure how they hear — and that measurement is never a single number. The audiological evaluation is a battery of complementary tests, each probing a different part of the auditory system, bound together by one governing idea: the cross-check principle. No result is accepted in isolation; every behavioural finding is checked against an independent, objective measure of the same function. When they agree, confidence grows; when they clash, the disagreement is itself the diagnosis — the present-emission-but-absent-brainstem-response of auditory neuropathy, or the too-good-to-be-true objective tests of a non-organic loss. This chapter is the audiologist's toolkit; the candidacy decision that uses its output is the next chapter. We begin with the logic that holds the whole battery together.
FWhat this chapter is
This is the how-we-measure-hearingchapter — the audiologist's diagnostic battery, from the pure tone to the cross-checked picture. It is the clinical foundation the candidacy decision (Chapter 11) rests on: candidacy applies these measurements; here we learn to make them.[2020]
FThe cross-check principle
The organising idea, from Jerger and Hayes, is simple and powerful: the result of any single audiometric test is cross-checked by an independent measure of the same function. A behavioural threshold is confirmed by an objective one; an audiogram is validated by the speech reception threshold. No number stands alone.[1976]
TPatterns and site of lesion
Each site of lesion leaves a recognisable fingerprint across the battery. Conductive, cochlear, retrocochlear, auditory neuropathy and non-organic patterns each combine the air–bone gap, tympanogram, reflexes, OAEs, evoked potentials and speech scores in a distinct way — so the diagnosis falls out of reading the tests together, never one at a time.
TWhy physiologic tests come first
Objective measures (tympanometry, reflexes, OAEs, ABR, ASSR) need little or no cooperation, so they are the backbone for infants and the way to confirm or refute doubtful behavioural results. A practical consequence is order: opening the session with the quick physiologic battery means the audiologist enters threshold testing already expecting a result, ready to question a surprise rather than accept it.
FChapter roadmap
| Movement | Modules | What they cover |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioural core | 2–5 | Pure-tone audiometry, masking, bone conduction and the air–bone gap, and speech audiometry. |
| The objective battery | 6–10 | Immittance, the acoustic reflex, OAEs, the ABR, and ASSR / ECochG / cortical responses. |
| Children | 11–12 | Behavioural audiometry and speech perception in babies and young children. |
| Real-world & synthesis | 13–18 | Speech-in-noise, real-ear verification, loudness/tinnitus/non-organic loss, self-report, tele-audiology, and putting it all together. |
We start with the test at the centre of it all — pure-tone audiometry (Module 2).
How should the conflicting results be interpreted?
What is the cross-check principle?
Why does Wolfe recommend running the physiologic battery before behavioural testing?