Cochlear Implant Atlas
CI Atlas · Devices & Electrode Arrays · Module 01

1Anatomy of a Cochlear Implant System

Before any electrode meets any nerve, sound must cross a barrier that no wire penetrates: intact skin. This opening module tours the cochlear implant as a two-part machine — an external sound processor and an internal receiver-stimulator — coupled only by a pair of magnets and an inductive radio link. Naming every component now gives us a shared vocabulary for the rest of the chapter.

FA two-part transcutaneous system

Every modern cochlear implant is a transcutaneous two-part system: an external sound processor and an internal receiver-stimulator held together across unbroken skin by one external and one internal magnet, with no electrical conductor crossing the skin. The percutaneous skin-penetrating plugs of the early Michelson, Banfai and House-era designs were abandoned because a permanent port invites infection.[2020]

TThe external processor

The external processor has five basic parts — one or more microphones, a digital signal processor, a (usually lithium-ion rechargeable) battery, an external transmitting coil, and the external magnet. Off-the-ear single-unit processors collapse all five into one button-sized housing worn on the head with no behind-the-ear cable.[2008]

The whole system — tap a part

externalinternal · skinReceiver-stimulator
Receiver-stimulator · internalA hermetic titanium case (with a ceramic feedthrough) housing the decoder and current sources that generate the pulses.

Every modern cochlear implant is a two-part transcutaneous system: an external sound processor (microphone, processor, battery, transmit coil and magnet) and an internal receiver-stimulator (receiver coil and magnet, decoder and current sources in a hermetic titanium case, lead wires, the intracochlear array and an extracochlear reference). No electrical conductor crosses the skin — power and data pass by induction — which is why the skin-penetrating plugs of the earliest devices were abandoned. Schematic.

CThe internal device

The internal device has six parts — the internal coil, the internal magnet, a digital signal processor, the stimulator that generates the pulses, the lead wires, and the intracochlear electrode array. Coil, processor and stimulator together are the 'receiver/stimulator'.[2009]

FThe hermetic titanium case

The receiver-stimulator electronics are sealed in a hermetic biocompatible titanium case with a ceramic-to-metal feedthrough seal, technology borrowed from cardiac pacemakers and NASA. Clark's Nucleus design had to pass about 20 electrode leads through a single seal without fluid ingress; the modern trend is toward thinner cases that need a shallower bony well and put less tension on the skin flap.[2014]

TArray and reference electrode

The intracochlear array carries multiple platinum contacts inserted into scala tympani; in the common monopolar mode the stimulus returns to a separate extracochlear reference/ground electrode. This active-array-plus-distant-reference arrangement is conceptually identical to the very first 1957 Djourno-Eyries device, whose failure traced to a broken solder joint at the ground electrode (cross-ref Ch.1 History).

CDevice versus coding strategy

Critically, the DEVICE (hardware, electrodes, telemetry) is distinct from the CODING STRATEGY (the software rule converting sound to a pulse pattern). The same implant can run CIS, ACE or fine-structure strategies by reprogramming; the hardware merely caps electrode count, maximum pulse rate, current compliance and telemetry capability (cross-ref Ch.8 From Sound to Stimulation).

Hardware or software? — sort each item (0/8)

Electrode arrayACE strategyTitanium casen-of-m selection ruleRF transmit coilMaximum pulse-rate ceilingCIS / fine-structure codingCurrent sources

DEVICE hardware

CODING-STRATEGY software

The device (electrode array, titanium case, coil, current sources) is fixed silicon and platinum; the coding strategy (CIS, ACE, fine-structure, the n-of-m rule) is software that can be re-programmed on the very same implant. The hardware only sets the limits the strategy must live within — electrode count, maximum pulse rate, current compliance and telemetry. This is why a processor upgrade can deliver a newer strategy on an unchanged internal array (cross-ref Ch.8 From Sound to Stimulation). Schematic.

For a single, sortable side-by-side of every system available today — contacts, current sources, channels, coding strategies, processors, connectivity, water resistance and MRI conditions — see the master device comparison.

Case 13.1 · Hardware or software?
A patient with a 10-year-old implant asks whether she needs new surgery to get the latest sound-coding strategy.

What is the best answer?

Self-assessment — Module 12 questions
Question 1

What couples the external and internal parts of a cochlear implant?

Question 2

Which is hardware rather than coding strategy?

Tracked locally in your browser — see /progress for the dashboard.