Cochlear Implant Atlas

CI Atlas · References

Full references

Every clinical claim in the atlas is anchored against this typed registry of 1011 peer-reviewed references, with DOI or PMID links where available and Oxford CEBM evidence levels where the source stated one. Search by author, year, title, journal, or the atlas note for each entry. Return to the Tools module or jump to the introduction for the atlas roadmap.

  • 2026
    Andonie RR, Bester C, Wijewickrema S, et al.Electrocochleography for monitoring hearing preservation during cochlear implantationJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery; 152(2):117–125

    Multifeature/automated intraoperative ECochG analysis — direction of travel beyond single-amplitude alarms.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2026
    Prahlada NB, Sri Vijay, Suman S, Giriyappa C, Prahlada SPre-operative Radiological Evaluation for Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Rational Check-listProspective study, tertiary care teaching hospital (institutional ethics committee approved), 2018-ongoing; presented as a research poster
    prahladnb

    The authors' MRI-predominant, selective-HRCT protocol with the MRI fishbone and HRCT inside-out checklists — the organising philosophy of this chapter.

  • 2026
    Valayannopoulos V, et al.DB-OTO Gene Therapy for Inherited DeafnessNew England Journal of Medicine; 394(11):NEJMoa2400521

    Dual-AAV DB-OTO (Regeneron CHORD trial); hair-cell-specific promoter; sustained hearing/speech gains in children.

  • 2026
    Jang CH, Kim DYAuditory and Tinnitus Outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge ImplantationBrain Sciences

    Contemporary active middle-ear implant outcomes, including coupling sites.

  • 2026
    Chau IJ, McCray LR, Nguyen SA, Labadie RF, et alInterventions for the diagnosis and management of otosclerosis: an umbrella reviewOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

    Illustrates how anatomy and disease state steer device versus surgery decisions.

  • 2026
    Weng W, Gao J, Chase C, Rachel C, et alLong-term outcomes of pediatric cochlear implantation for single-sided deafnessEar and Hearing

    Durability of CI benefit in SSD and the importance of timing.

  • 2026
    Alemu RZ, Blakeman A, Negandhi J, Papsin BC, et alBenefits of Bilateral Bone Conduction Device Use Including Osia Devices in ChildrenTrends in Hearing

    Evidence for binaural benefit of bilateral BCD/active devices in children.

  • 2026
    He S, Gao Z, Oleson JJ, Bruce ICThe Interphase Gap Effect in Cochlear Implant Users: Biological Basis, Parameter Selection, Analytical Methods, and Quantitative ScalesJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

    Authoritative recent review of the interphase-gap effect on threshold and its meaning.

  • 2025
    Garcia C, Carlyon RPAssessing array-type differences in cochlear implant users using the Panoramic ECAP methodEar and Hearing; 46(5):1355–1368

    Array-type comparison of current spread by panoramic ECAP — direction-of-travel.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions, Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2025
    Nair APS, Mishra SK, Alba Diaz PA, et al.A systematic review of machine learning approaches in cochlear implant outcomesnpj Digital Medicine; 8(1):411

    Recent systematic review of machine-learning methods across CI outcomes, including fitting and programming.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2025
    Morton S, Dwyer B, Dwyer N, et al.Remote programming of adult and pediatric cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial resultsOtology & Neurotology Open; 5(3):e073

    Multicentre prospective trial: remote (smartphone) CI programming non-inferior to in-person.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2025
    Baumgartner WD, Gavilán J, Benghalem A, et al.Experts' discussion: implications of the World Health Organization's World report on hearing for the cochlear implant fieldBrazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology; 91(2):101556

    WHO World Report on Hearing framing for global access in the CI field.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2025
    Suazo-Díaz P, Aedo-Sanchez C, Cuéllar-Muñoz G, et al.Equitable access to cochlear implants: a perspective on social justice and international obligationsFrontiers in Public Health; 13:1672820

    Perspective on equitable access to cochlear implantation — social-justice and access framing.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2025
    Du Q, Sun Z, Kong W, et alEvaluation of safety and effectiveness of the LISTENT LCI-20PI cochlear implant in post-lingually deafened individualsJournal of International Advanced Otology; 21(1):e241627

    Clinical evaluation of the second Chinese domestic cochlear implant (Listent, from Fudan University's Eye & ENT Hospital lineage).

    Cited in: The implant goes global

  • 2025
    Hey M, Hoppe U (eds)Management of audiological disorders in cochlear implants: outcomes in demanding listening situations and future perspectivesJournal of Clinical Medicine; 14(6):2089

    Modern collection on real-world/speech-in-noise outcome measurement and the move toward ecologically valid 'evaluative audiometry'.

    Cited in: Tele-audiology & the future

  • 2025
    Du Q, Sun Z, Kong W, et alEvaluation of safety and effectiveness of the LISTENT LCI-20PI cochlear implant in post-lingually deafened individualsThe Journal of International Advanced Otology; 21(1):1–8

    Prospective evaluation of Shanghai-based LISTENT's LCI-20PI lateral-wall implant, one of China's domestically developed low-cost systems.

    Cited in: The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes

  • 2025
    Molaee-Ardekani B, Attili Chiea B, Zhang Y, et alA Novel Sound Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants Based on Spectral Feature and Temporal Event ExtractionTechnologies (Basel); 13(8):318

    SFE strategy (zero-crossing fine structure + envelope).

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2025
    Hajjij A, El Hani H, Bourial A, El Bouhmadi K, Benchikh S, Anajar S, Rami A, Moussali N, Snoussi KCSF gushers in cochlear implantation: surgical planning and managementBMC Surgery, 25(1):560

    Candidate DOI 10.1007/s00405-024-08610-y is invalid (Crossref 404) and source (European Archives Oto-Rhino-Laryngology) was wrong. A paper with this exact title exists: Hajjij et al., BMC Surgery 2025;25(1):560 (DOI verified via Crossref). Candidate authors (Boudaba et al.) and year (2024) also wrong; corrected.

  • 2025
    Hey M, Hoppe UManagement of audiological disorders in cochlear implants: outcomes in demanding listening situations and future perspectivesJournal of Clinical Medicine; 14(6):2089

    Speech-in-noise outcomes and ecologically valid assessment in CI.

  • 2025
    Wang X, Tran P, Kapolowicz MR, et alCustomized strategies for managing cochlear implant stimulation side effectsCochlear Implants International; 26(2):79-92

    Customized mapping strategies for off-target stimulation side effects (including FNS and non-auditory percepts); FNS reduced or eliminated in 5 of 5 subjects.

  • 2025
    Prenzler N, Salcher R, Lenarz T, Manrique-Huarte R, Manrique M, et al.Cochlear implantation with a dexamethasone-eluting electrode array: first-in-human safety and performance resultsHearing Research; 459:109255
    doi:10.1016/j.heares.2025.109255PMID 40158223prenzler2025-cidexel-firstinhuman

    First-in-human feasibility study of the CIDEXEL (dexamethasone-eluting FLEX) system, 9 participants to 9 months. Good residual-hearing preservation and speech outcomes comparable to a non-eluting FLEX28. Trial evidence for module 4.

  • 2025
    Briggs RJS et al.Evaluation of a Totally Implantable Cochlear Implant in Adults With Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Feasibility StudyEar and Hearing; Epub ahead of print / advance online

    Prospective feasibility study, 10 adults unilaterally implanted with TICI Research System; invisible-hearing (IH) mode used 22-88% of listening time (median 49%); 2 device failures from a microphone hermeticity issue. Verify advance-publication locator before citing as final.

  • 2025
    Samuel-Sierra PA, et al.Feasibility of Self-Programming of the Speech Processor Via Remote Assistant Fitting in Experienced Cochlear Implant UsersInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngology; 2025 Jan

    No significant difference in T/C levels between behavioural and self-adjusted RAF maps in experienced adults.

  • 2025
    Kurz A, Herrmann D, Muller-Graff FT, Voelker J, Hackenberg S, Rak KAnatomy-based fitting improves speech perception in noise for cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafnessEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 282(1):467-479

    Anatomy-based fitting (electrode position from imaging, e.g. OTOPLAN) improved speech-in-noise by ~1-1.7 dB vs standard clinical fitting.

  • 2025
    Ramos-de-Miguel Á, Sluydts M, Falcón JC, Manrique-Huarte R, Rodriguez I, Zarowski A, Barbara M, Manrique M, Borkoski S, Lorente J, Leblanc M, Rambault A, Van Baelen E, Van Himbeeck C, Huarte A, Ramos-Macías ÁEnhancing balance and auditory function in bilateral vestibulopathy through otolithic vestibular stimulation: insights from a pilot study on cochlea-vestibular implant efficacyFrontiers in Neurology; 16:1520554

    Combined cochleovestibular device with otolith stimulation; PTA improved 78 to ~34-36 dB HL; SOT 33% to 68%; residual balance gain after deactivation suggests adaptation.

  • 2025
    van Heteren JAA, Wendrich AW, Peters JPM, et alSpeech Perception in Noise After Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: A Randomized TrialJAMA Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery

    Evidence that a CI, not just rerouting, benefits single-sided deafness.

  • 2025
    Cuda D, Mancini P, Chiarella G, Santarelli RRetrocochlear Auditory Dysfunctions and Their Treatment: A Narrative ReviewAudiology Research

    Defines the retrocochlear boundary where the CI gives way to the brainstem implant.

  • 2025
    Gawecki W, Gibasiewicz R, Blaszczyk M, et al.Active piezoelectric bone conduction implant Osia: surgical and audiological outcomesEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Contemporary Osia piezo outcomes including MRI and complication profile.

  • 2025
    Ordonez-Ordonez L, Caraballo JA, Ordonez-Mora E, et al.Active osseointegrated steady-state implant system: surgical and audiological resultsOtology & Neurotology
    PMID 39972997ordonez2025osia

    Surgical and audiological results for the active osseointegrated steady-state (Osia) system.

  • 2025
    Ardic FN, Gulmez MI, Okuyucu S, Sahin M, et alEvaluation of bone-anchored hearing instruments in chronic otitis media: a multicentre studyTurkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology

    Real-world outcomes of bone-conduction implants in the classic discharging-ear indication.

  • 2025
    Hey M, Hocke TOptimizing CI Systems for Better Recognition of Soft Speech - the Concept of Broad-Range MappingLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

    Recent work on input-range/mapping choices for soft-speech audibility.

  • 2025
    Alahmadi A, Abdelsamad Y, AlAmari NA, Alyousef MY, Al-Momani M, et alHearing implants in pediatrics with cochlear nerve deficiency: an updated systematic reviewEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

    Reviews CI-versus-ABI decision-making in cochlear nerve deficiency, supporting the CI-first principle.

  • 2025
    Holcomb MA, Coto J, Stern T, Sarangoulis CM, Cejas IRemote Care: The Future of Cochlear ImplantsOtology & Neurotology

    Reviews telecare, datalogging and remote programming and their outcomes/feasibility.

  • 2024
    Neubio AGNeubio cochlear implant — made in IndiaNeubio (manufacturer)
    external linkneubioindia

    Manufacturer information on the Neubio BOLD, a Swiss-designed, made-in-India cochlear implant with an electronic-free internal component.

    Cited in: The implant goes global

  • 2024
    Mecklenburg DJ, Graham PL, James CJRelationships Between Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Short Form SSQ12 Item Scores and their Use in Guiding Rehabilitation for Cochlear Implant RecipientsTrends in Hearing, 28:23312165231224643; 28:23312165231224643

    Candidate journal was wrong: 'Audiology and Neurotology, 29(1):16-30' is incorrect; verified record is Trends in Hearing vol 28, article 23312165231224643.

  • 2024
    Hearing Loss Association of AmericaCochlear Implants & Other Implantable DevicesHearing Loss Association of America (hearingloss.org)

    Web page confirmed live; title corrected to use ampersand as published. Working URL found and supplied (original gave only the bare domain).

  • 2024
    Wang Q, Kapolowicz MR, Li JN, Ji F, Shen WD, Wang FY, Chen W, Guo WW, Zhang C, Liu RY, Zhang M, Hong MD, Chen AT, Zeng FG, Yang SMA prospective cohort study of cochlear implantation as a treatment for tinnitus in post-lingually deafened individualsCommunications Medicine, 4(1):274

    DOI is valid and resolves to a paper with this exact title, but candidate authors (Zeman et al.) and article number (40) were wrong. Real record: Wang Q et al., Communications Medicine 2024;4(1):274, PMID 39702461. Corrected authors, source/article number.

  • 2024
    Kashani RG, Henslee A, Nelson RF, Hansen MRRobotic assistance during cochlear implantation: the rationale for consistent, controlled speed of electrode array insertionFrontiers in Neurology; 15:1335994

    Review of insertion-speed/force rationale for robotic insertion.

  • 2024
    Cornwall HL, Lam CM, Chaudhry D, Muzaffar J, Monksfield P, Bance MLOutcomes of cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome: a systematic reviewEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 281(3):1115-1129

    Generally good auditory outcomes in Usher syndrome.

  • 2024
    Garcia A, Haleem A, Poe S, et al.Auditory brainstem implant outcomes in tumor and nontumor patients: a systematic reviewOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; 2024
    PMID 38329219garcia2024

    Systematic review confirming the non-tumour ABI outcome advantage.

  • 2024
    Kaufmann CR, Henslee AM, Claussen A, Hansen MRRobotic assistance during cochlear implantation: the rationale for consistent, controlled speed of electrode array insertionFrontiers in Neurology; 15:1335994

    Argument for slow, constant insertion speed to reduce force spikes and intracochlear trauma. Supports the speed-vs-force widget.

  • 2024
    Askin GS, Gokceli S, Sumer BOn the design, fabrication, and characterization of a novel thin-film electrode array for use in cochlear implantsMicromachines (Basel); 15(7):921
    doi:10.3390/mi15070921PMID 39064432askin2024-thinfilm-parylene

    Modern parylene thin-film electrode array with finite-element and tribological characterization, illustrating flexible polymer micro-fabricated arrays for module 5.

  • 2024
    Sorrentino F, Cazzador D, Gazzola F, Cassarà A, Ariano M, Colombo A, Franchella S, Trevisi P, de Filippis C, Marioni G, Zanoletti E, Brotto DRemote Check as a tele-health instrument for cochlear implant recipients: Analysis of impact and feasibility of applicationAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology; 45(4):104294

    Real-world Remote Check (smartphone app) reproduced in-clinic outcomes and reduced clinic burden.

  • 2024
    Lv J, Wang H, Cheng X, Chen Y, Wang D, Zhang L, et al.AAV1-hOTOF gene therapy for autosomal recessive deafness 9: a single-arm trialThe Lancet; 403(10441):2317-2325

    First-in-human OTOF gene therapy; hearing recovered in 5 of 6 children with DFNB9.

  • 2024
    Wang H, Chen Y, Lv J, Cheng X, Cao Q, Wang D, et al.Bilateral gene therapy in children with autosomal recessive deafness 9: single-arm trial resultsNature Medicine; 30(7):1898-1904

    Bilateral AAV1-hOTOF restored hearing and improved sound localization; no serious adverse events.

  • 2024
    Huet A, Mager T, Gossler C, Moser TToward Optogenetic Hearing RestorationAnnual Review of Neuroscience; 47:103-121

    Most recent Moser-group review. Current spread is the bottleneck limiting frequency channels; outlines remaining challenges to clinical translation.

  • 2024
    Prahlada NB, Sri Vijay, Suman S, Giriyappa C, Prahlada SA prognosis-oriented algorithm to help decision-making in inner ear malformationsResearch poster (cohort of 86 patients, tertiary-care teaching hospital); Retrospective cohort, 86 children aged 2-6 years, study period 2014 onward; multidisciplinary history/clinical/audiology/CT/MRI evaluation
    prahlada_iem_algorithm

    Author's own work; prognosis-oriented diagnostic algorithm integrating hearing status and imaging. Stepwise eight-question decision flow predicting treatment, surgical difficulty and prognosis, with gusher likelihoods and CI-vs-ABI verdicts by malformation type.

  • 2024
    Claussen AD, Kocharyan A, Bennion DM, et al.Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant InsertionOtology & Neurotology; 45(5):e459

    Robotic insertion system delivering slow, low-force insertion with simultaneous ECochG feedback.

  • 2024
    Li Y, Yang H, Niu X, Sun YThe Long-Term Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisDiagnostics (Basel); 14(18):2028

    SR/meta-analysis of long-term CI effect on tinnitus; durable reduction; quantifies pooled new-onset tinnitus incidence. Verified PubMed.

  • 2024
    Manuelli M, Migliorelli A, Moretti C, et alBone-conduction Hearing Aids: A Scoping ReviewIndian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery

    Maps modern indications including atresia and failed middle-ear surgery.

  • 2024
    Wils I, Geerardyn A, Putzeys T, et alObjective preclinical measures for bone conduction implantsFrontiers in Neuroscience

    Underpins the active-transducer and skin-crossing distinctions.

  • 2024
    Stenfelt S, Zeitooni M, Maki-Torkko EEvaluating binaural hearing capabilities in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss through bone conductionScientific Reports

    Stenfelt's contemporary work on binaural bone conduction and cross-skull transmission.

  • 2024
    von Mitzlaff C, Dobrev I, Farahmandi T, et alInfluence of the Intracranial Contents on the Head Motion under Bone ConductionAudiology & Neurotology
    doi:10.1159/000537724PMID 38342086vonmitzlaff2024headmotion

    Explains how intracranial contents shape head vibration and transcranial behaviour.

  • 2024
    Vagle M, Bille M, Gordon Jensen RPiezoelectric bone conduction hearing implant: a case series of audiological outcomesJournal of Clinical Medicine

    Piezoelectric (Osia) outcome series supporting high output and MRI compatibility.

  • 2024
    Zeitler DM, Prentiss SM, Sydlowski SA, et alAmerican Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: recommendations for determining cochlear implant candidacy in adultsThe Laryngoscope

    Candidacy framework spanning conventional, SSD and asymmetric indications.

  • 2024
    Key S, Mohamed N, Da Cruz M, Kong K, Hasan ZSystematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a New Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction ImplantThe Laryngoscope

    Outcome synthesis for a newer active transcutaneous implant.

  • 2024
    Garcia C, Morse-Fortier C, Guerit F, Hislop S, et al.Investigating the Effect of Blurring and Focusing Current in Cochlear Implant Users with the Panoramic ECAP MethodJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

    Shows how focusing versus broadening current alters thresholds and spread.

  • 2024
    Sennaroglu L, Lenarz T, Roland JT, Lee DJ, Colletti L, et alCurrent status of pediatric auditory brainstem implantation in inner ear malformationsCochlear Implants International

    Contemporary status of paediatric ABI, the culmination of the European turn.

  • 2024
    Joy A, Ledger S, Duncan JDeaf role-models for Deaf children in hearing families: a scoping reviewJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Synthesises how Deaf role models shift parental attitudes and balance audiological approaches.

  • 2024
    Bleckly F, Matthews N, Lo CYIdentity change of late-deafened adults after receiving cochlear implantsDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

    Qualitative spectrum of identity outcomes in late-deafened adult implant users.

  • 2024
    Konig C, Baumann U, Stover T, Weissgerber TImpact of reverberation on speech perception in noise in bimodal/bilateral cochlear implant users with and without residual hearingJournal of Clinical Medicine

    Direct evidence that reverberation degrades CI speech perception in noise.

  • 2024
    Thibodeau LM, Leach V, Sivaswami A, Qi SBenefits of speech recognition in noise using remote microphones for people with typical hearingJournal of Communication Disorders

    Shows remote microphones improve speech-in-noise even for typical-hearing listeners, underlining the SNR principle.

  • 2024
    Wikipedia contributorsAuracast broadcast audioWikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auracast)
    auracast2024wiki

    Overview of Auracast deployment and one-to-many broadcast for hearing devices.

  • 2024
    Hearing Loss Association of AmericaAssistive Listening Systems and Hearing Assistive TechnologyHearing Loss Association of America (hearingloss.org)
    hlaa2024als

    Consumer-facing overview of ALS, alerting devices and accommodations.

  • 2024
    Hearing Loss Association of AmericaCaptioning: CART, captioned telephone and media captionsHearing Loss Association of America (hearingloss.org)
    hlaa2024captioning

    Summarises the spectrum of captioning options and when each fits.

  • 2024
    North Carolina DHHS, Division of Services for the Deaf and Hard of HearingCommunication Access Realtime Translation (CART) CaptioningNCDHHS (ncdhhs.gov)
    ncdhhs2024cart

    Official definition of CART as live human near-verbatim captioning.

  • 2024
    Center for Hearing AccessAuracast Streamed Assistive Listening Systems and ADA accessCenter for Hearing Access (centerforhearingaccess.org)
    chax2024auracast

    Explains Auracast as a future ALS option and the loop-plus-Auracast transition strategy.

  • 2024
    Borjigin A, Kokkinakis K, Bharadwaj HM, Stohl JSDeep learning restores speech intelligibility in multi-talker interference for cochlear implant usersScientific Reports

    RNN and transformer denoising improve CI intelligibility in multi-talker noise.

  • 2023
    Gärtner L, Backus BC, Le Goff N, et al.Cochlear implant stimulation parameters play a key role in reducing facial nerve stimulationJournal of Clinical Medicine; 12(19):6194

    Stimulation-parameter and coupling changes to manage facial-nerve stimulation.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2023
    Rocha LV, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Hoshino AC, et al.Hearing performance in cochlear implant users who have facial nerve stimulationInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngology; 28(2):e301–e306

    Current reduction and electrode deactivation for facial-nerve stimulation.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2023
    Tahmasebi S, Segovia-Martinez M, Nogueira WOptimization of Sound Coding Strategies to Make Singing Music More Accessible for Cochlear Implant UsersTrends in Hearing; 27:23312165221148022

    Music/coding optimization.

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2023
    Gajecki T, Zhang Y, Nogueira WA Deep Denoising Sound Coding Strategy for Cochlear ImplantsIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; 70(9):2700-2709

    End-to-end deep-learning sound-coding strategy.

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2023
    Richter J, Welker S, Lemercier J-M, Lay B, Gerkmann TSpeech Enhancement and Dereverberation With Diffusion-Based Generative ModelsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing; 31:2351-2364

    Diffusion-model speech enhancement.

  • 2023
    Gowrishankar S, Fleet A, Tomasoni M, Kuhn I, Tysome J, Smith ME, Donnelly N, Axon P, Borsetto D, Bance MMeningitis Risk in Patients with Inner Ear Malformations after Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisOtology & Neurotology, 44(7):627-635

    PMID confirmed; candidate issue/pages were wrong (was 44(8) e547-e554; actual 44(7) 627-635). Full author list added. Corrected.

  • 2023
    Tuset MP, et al.Facial nerve stimulation in adult cochlear implant recipients with far-advanced otosclerosisLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology; 8(4):1066-1074

    Facial-nerve stimulation in otosclerotic ears and its management.

  • 2023
    Lin FR, Pike JR, Albert MS, et al.Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss (ACHIEVE): a multicentre randomised controlled trialThe Lancet; 402(10404):786-797

    Hearing intervention slowed cognitive decline ~48% in higher-risk older adults.

  • 2023
    Caragli V, Monzani D, Genovese E, Palma S, Persico AMCochlear implantation in children with additional disabilities: a systematic reviewChildren (Basel); 10(10):1653

    Benefit and function-based outcomes in children with additional disabilities.

  • 2023
    Alahmadi A, Abdelsamad Y, Yousef M, Alhabib SF, Alshalan A, Hamed N, Alzhrani FRisk factors and management strategies of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation in cochlear implant recipients: A systematic reviewLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology; 8(5):1345-1356

    Systematic review of risk factors (otosclerosis, malformation, near-modiolus/basal electrodes, lateral-wall arrays) and the management ladder (current/pulse-width/rate reduction, electrode deactivation, mode change, triphasic/anodic pulses, last-resort revision).

  • 2023
    Kaufmann CR, Henslee AM, Claussen A, Hansen MRA Steadier Hand: The First Human Clinical Trial of a Single-Use Robotic-Assisted Surgical Device for Cochlear Implant Electrode Array InsertionOtology & Neurotology; 44(1):34-39

    First-in-human iotaSOFT trial (iotaMotion). 20/21 (95.2%) successful lateral-wall insertions; compatible with all three manufacturers' FDA-approved arrays. Selectable speed 0.1-1.0 mm/s.

  • 2023
    Abdulbaki H, Mo J, Limb CJ, Jiam NTThe impact of musical rehabilitation on complex sound perception in cochlear implant users: a systematic reviewOtology & Neurotology; 44(10):965-977

    Systematic review of music rehabilitation; perception gains are real but modest, with appraisal/enjoyment often improving more than measured perception.

  • 2023
    Deklerck AN, Swinnen F, Keppler H, Dhooge IJMChanges in Tinnitus Characteristics and Residual Inhibition following Cochlear Implantation: A Prospective AnalysisBrain Sciences; 13(10):1484

    Residual inhibition (tinnitus suppression persisting after device removal) present in ~80% of recipients at 3 months vs 8.8% pre-implant; argues for implant-induced central neuroplasticity, not mere masking.

  • 2023
    Oh SJ, Mavrommatis MA, Fan CJ, DiRisio AC, Villavisanis DF, Berson ER, Schwam ZG, Wanna GB, Cosetti MKCochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 168(2):131-142

    Meta-analysis of CI in SSD: significant tinnitus reduction (SMD -1.32, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.80), plus speech, localisation, QoL gains. Verified PubMed.

  • 2023
    Sprinzl G, Toner J, Koitschev A, et al.Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Pivotal multicentre safety and audiological data for the thinner active BCI602.

  • 2023
    Chew D, Proctor V, Ray JNew Osia OSI200 active transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing device: how I do itEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Surgical technique for the screw-based Osia active transcutaneous implant.

  • 2023
    Potier M, Gallego S, Fournier P, Marx M, et alAmplification of the poorer ear by StereoBiCROS in case of asymmetric sensorineural hearing lossFrontiers in Neuroscience

    Illustrates rerouting strategies and their limits in asymmetric loss.

  • 2023
    Harris MK, Kaul VF, Bergman M, Dodson EE, Ren Y, Adunka OF, et alOutcomes After Transcutaneous Bone-Conduction Implantation in Adults and ChildrenOtology & Neurotology

    Paediatric and adult transcutaneous implant outcomes and considerations.

  • 2023
    Caswell-Midwinter B, Arenberg JGComparing Fixed and Individualized Channel Interaction Coefficients for Speech Perception With Dynamic Focusing Cochlear Implant StrategiesTrends in Hearing

    Focused-mode thresholds and channel interaction in clinical strategies.

  • 2023
    Veronese S, Cambiaghi M, Tommasi N, Sbarbati ATen-year follow-up of auditory brainstem implants: from intra-operative electrophysiology to long-term outcomesPLoS One

    Long-term electrophysiologic and clinical follow-up after ABI surgery.

  • 2023
    Pontecorvo E, Higgins M, Mora J, Lieberman AM, Pyers J, Caselli NKLearning a sign language does not hinder acquisition of a spoken languageJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

    Larger sign vocabulary positively associated with larger spoken vocabulary in bilingual children.

  • 2022
    Bester C, Collins A, Razmovski T, et al.Electrocochleography-triggered intervention successfully preserves residual hearing during cochlear implantation: results of a randomised clinical trialHearing Research; 426:108353

    RCT: intraoperative ECochG-triggered intervention preserves residual hearing (the ≥30%-drop alarm protocol).

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG, Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2022
    Trudel M, Morris DPThe remaining obstacles for a totally implantable cochlear implantCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery; 30(5):298–302

    Concise review of the barriers (implantable microphone, power) to fully implantable CIs.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2022
    TODOC / The Korea HeraldTODOC to introduce high-performance and low-cost artificial cochlear implant 'Sullivan'The Korea Herald (industry news)
    external linktodocsullivan2022

    Reports the Korean TODOC 'Sullivan', described as the first 32-channel cochlear implant, launched in Korea in 2021 with an automated low-cost electrode-manufacturing approach.

    Cited in: The implant goes global

  • 2022
    Grover M, Gupta G, Preetam C (eds)Textbook of Radiology for Cochlear ImplantsThieme Medical Publishers

    The dedicated reference text for cochlear-implant radiology — CT/MRI technique, temporal-bone anatomy, malformations, the cochlear nerve, ossification, intra-/post-operative imaging, and a structured reporting checklist.

    Cited in: Materials, Reliability and MRI, The Cochlear Implant of the Future and Choosing a Device

  • 2022
    Eisenhut F, Taha L, Manhart M, et alHigh-speed flat-detector computed tomography for temporal bone imaging and postoperative control of cochlear implantsNeuroradiology; 64(7):1437–1445

    High-speed flat-detector CT cuts scan time to beat motion artefact for post-operative electrode-position control, trading dose against image quality (7/9/14 s protocols).

  • 2022
    DeSa Souza S (ed)Cochlear Implants: New and Future DirectionsSpringer
    desasouza2022

    Edited volume on emerging cochlear-implant technology and future device directions.

    Cited in: The Cochlear Implant of the Future and Choosing a Device

  • 2022
    Zeng FGCelebrating the one millionth cochlear implantJASA Express Letters; 2(7):077201

    One-million-user milestone; CI prevalence.

  • 2022
    Crohan W, Rajan GPStructure Preservation of the Inner Ear in Cochlear ImplantationIn: DeSa Souza S, ed. Cochlear Implants: New and Future Directions. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022. p.363-385; p.363-385

    15-20% short-term / 2% permanent vestibular-loss figures; intracochlear-pressure-transient mechanism; soft-surgery levers.

    Cited in: How Implant Surgery Injures the Labyrinth, Choosing the Ear: Vestibular Risk and Bilateral Implants, Atraumatic Surgery: Preserving Hearing and Balance Together

  • 2022
    DeSaSouza S (ed.)Cochlear Implants: New and Future DirectionsSpringer Nature Singapore

    Genuine textbook edited by Dr. Sandra DeSaSouza (Padma Shri awardee). Print ISBN 978-981-19-0451-6 confirmed on Springer; eBook DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-0452-3. Source corrected from 'Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Berlin Heidelberg' to Springer Nature Singapore. Note: same work as the 'desouza2022' candidate.

  • 2022
    McRackan TR, Hand BN, Chidarala S, Velozo CA, Dubno JR; Cochlear Implant Quality of Life ConsortiumNormative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional StudyOtology & Neurotology, 43(7):797-802; 43(7):797-802

    Candidate metadata was wrong: year was 2021 (correct 2022), journal was 'Ear & Hearing' (correct Otology & Neurotology), authors and pages corrected to the verified record.

  • 2022
    Lahlou G, Daoudi H, Ferrary E, Jia H, De Bergh M, Nguyen Y, Sterkers O, Mosnier ICandidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult PatientsJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 7, p. 1874

    PMID 35407482 and DOI 10.3390/jcm11071874 confirmed via Europe PMC and point to this exact paper. CORRECTED AUTHORS: candidate listed 'Alkhiary AA, Elfar H, Gumaa R, et al.' but the real authors are Lahlou G, Daoudi H, Ferrary E, Jia H, De Bergh M, Nguyen Y, Sterkers O, Mosnier I. Title, journal, year, volume, issue, page confirmed.

  • 2022
    Rasmussen KMB, West NC, Bille M, Sandvej MG, Cayé-Thomasen PCochlear Implantation Improves Both Speech Perception and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Prospective Follow-Up StudyJournal of Clinical Medicine, 11(8):2257

    Original candidate (Damen GW et al., Laryngoscope 131(9):E2362-E2370, DOI 10.1002/lary.29386) was WRONG on every field: that DOI points to an unrelated head-and-neck-surgery paper (Harris et al.). The exact title matches THIS paper by Rasmussen et al. in J Clin Med 2022, PMID 35456353 / DOI 10.3390/jcm11082257. Authors, year, journal, volume, and pages all corrected.

  • 2022
    De Seta D, et al. (Sandra DeSaSouza, ed.)Robot-assisted cochlear implantationCochlear Implants: New and Future Directions (Springer); book chapter
    deseta2022

    Review chapter on image-guided and robotic cochlear-implant surgery.

  • 2022
    Zucca M, Albera A, Albera R, et al.Cochlear implant results in older adults with post-lingual deafness: the role of 'top-down' neurocognitive mechanismsInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; 19(3):1343

    Processing speed as the strongest cognitive predictor of speech understanding at one year in older adults.

  • 2022
    Dillon MT, Kocharyan A, Daher GS, et al.American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force guidelines for clinical assessment and management of adult cochlear implantation for single-sided deafnessEar and Hearing; 43(6):1605-1619

    ACIA SSD/AHL guideline: goals, candidacy and outcomes.

  • 2022
    Kay-Rivest E, McMenomey SO, Jethanamest D, et al.Cochlear implant outcomes in CHARGE syndrome: updated perspectivesOtology & Neurotology; 43(6):632-637

    CHARGE temporal-bone anomalies and variable CI outcomes.

  • 2022
    Kleijbergen WJ, Sparreboom M, Mylanus EAM, et al.Benefit of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children between 5 to 18 years old: A prospective cohort studyPLoS One; 17(7):e0271497

    85 children, median interval 8 yr; bilateral gains in speech in quiet (96% vs 91%) and noise (65% vs 54%) even after long delay; interval not significantly tied to performance in this older second-ear cohort.

  • 2022
    Kay-Rivest E, McMenomey SO, Jethanamest D, Shapiro WH, Friedmann DR, Waltzman SB, Roland JT JrPredictive value of transimpedance matrix measurements to detect electrode tip foldoverOtology & Neurotology; 43(9):1027-1032

    Transimpedance/electrical-field telemetry detects tip fold-over, an objective adjunct to radiography.

  • 2022
    Rath S, Glaun M, Emery C, Liu YCElectrostatic Discharge (ESD) as a Cause of Facial Nerve Stimulation After Cochlear Implantation: A Case ReportAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 131(9):1043-1047

    ESD can corrupt processor maps/damage components and cause facial nerve stimulation; precautions warranted.

  • 2022
    Zeng FGCelebrating the one millionth cochlear implantJASA Express Letters; 2(7):077201

    Perspective by a leading CI scientist: one million implants worldwide, ~70-80% sentence recognition in quiet but performance plateaued since the 1990s; broad electrical spread and the electrode-neuron interface as the limiting bottleneck. Anchors the frontier/unmet-needs module.

  • 2022
    Topsakal V, Heuninck E, Matulic M, Tekin AM, Mertens G, Van Rompaey V, Galeazzi P, Zoka-Assadi M, Van de Heyning PFirst Study in Men Evaluating a Surgical Robotic Tool Providing Autonomous Inner Ear Access for Cochlear ImplantationFrontiers in Neurology; 13:804507

    HEARO procedure, Antwerp/Brussels. 22/25 procedures completed robotically; OTOPLAN trajectory planning; intraoperative cone-beam CT mean error 0.182 mm to target, 0.117 mm to facial nerve. Status: investigational/regulated.

  • 2022
    Blebea CM, Ujvary LP, Necula V, et al.Current Concepts and Future Trends in Increasing the Benefits of Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative ReviewMedicina (Kaunas); 58(6):747

    Reviews robotic insertion (fewer translocations), dexamethasone drug-eluting electrodes (better residual-hearing preservation), and gene/stem-cell therapy as future directions.

  • 2022
    Kay-Rivest E, McMenomey SO, Jethanamest D, Shapiro WH, Friedmann DR, Waltzman SB, Roland JT JrPredictive Value of Transimpedance Matrix Measurements to Detect Electrode Tip FoldoverOtology & Neurotology; 43(9):1027-1032

    Distinct from existing kayrivest2022 (CHARGE). TIM off-diagonal / reversed signature predicts tip fold-over; defines the abnormal heat-map pattern.

  • 2022
    Assouly KKS, Smit AL, Eikelboom RH, Sucher C, Atlas M, Stokroos RJ, Stegeman IAnalysis of a Cochlear Implant Database: Changes in Tinnitus Prevalence and Distress After Cochlear ImplantationTrends in Hearing; 26:23312165221128431

    Database analysis: tinnitus prevalence fell 55.8%->44.3%; new-onset (induction) ~9.2% of those with paired data; substantial worsening ~1.3%. Verified PubMed/PMC.

  • 2022
    Breen JT, Nader ME, Gidley PWUltrasound-Guided Placement of Percutaneous Abutments for Bone Conduction Hearing DevicesOtology & Neurotology

    Contemporary refinement of percutaneous abutment placement and soft-tissue management.

  • 2022
    Brkic FF, Baumgartner WD, Riss D, Thurner T, et al.Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Vibrant Soundbridge Users Requiring Cochlear ImplantationJournal of Personalized Medicine

    Documents the conversion-to-cochlear-implant pathway when SNHL outgrows the device.

  • 2022
    Forner D, Noel CW, Horwich P, Hong P, Shoman NActive Versus Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisEar and Hearing

    Head-to-head meta-analysis showing active devices favour high-frequency gain.

  • 2022
    Seiwerth I, Frohlich L, Schilde S, Gotze G, Plontke SK, Rahne TClinical and functional results after implantation of the bonebridge, a semi-implantable, active transcutaneous bone conduction device, in children and adultsEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Active transcutaneous device results spanning children and adults.

  • 2022
    Rahne T, Plontke SKSystematic and audiological indication criteria for bone conduction devices and active middle ear implantsHearing Research

    Indication framework anchoring where future devices fit the continuum.

  • 2022
    Lassaletta L, et alConsensus Statement on Bone Conduction Devices and Active Middle Ear Implants in Conductive and Mixed Hearing LossOtology & Neurotology

    Expert consensus on indications and device selection in conductive/mixed loss.

  • 2022
    Bissmeyer SRS, Goldsworthy RLCombining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant UsersHearing Research

    Shows how rate and current interact perceptually, relevant to loudness and level control.

  • 2022
    Garadat SN, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BEEstimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configurationHearing Research

    Makes strength-duration and mode-dependent thresholds a window onto neural health.

  • 2022
    McInturff S, Coen FV, Hight AE, Tarabichi O, Kanumuri VV, et alComparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem ImplantJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

    Mechanistic evidence on DCN versus VCN stimulation underlying paddle limitations.

  • 2022
    Kumar P, Bhatarai P, Jayan AAuditory brainstem implants in children with inner ear anomalies: an Indian perspectiveIndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    Paediatric ABI experience and counselling in a resource-varied setting.

  • 2022
    Humphries T, Mathur G, Napoli DJ, Padden C, Rathmann CDeaf Children Need Rich Language Input from the Start: Support in Advising ParentsChildren (Basel)

    Frames the core ethical imperative as preventing language deprivation, device or not.

  • 2022
    Bradfield OMHearing parents' voices: parental refusal of cochlear implants and the zone of parental discretionJournal of Bioethical Inquiry

    Applies the zone-of-parental-discretion framework directly to CI decisions.

  • 2022
    Nassiri AM, Sorkin DL, Carlson MLCurrent Estimates of Cochlear Implant Utilization in the United StatesOtology and Neurotology

    Demonstrates that only a small fraction of eligible adults are implanted.

  • 2022
    Miller S, Wolfe J, Neumann S, Schafer EC, Galster JRemote Microphone Systems for Cochlear Implant Recipients in Small Group SettingsSeminars in Hearing

    Demonstrates partner/remote-microphone accessory benefit for CI users in group settings.

  • 2022
    Bluetooth SIGLE Audio and the LC3 codec: next-generation Bluetooth audioBluetooth Special Interest Group (bluetooth.com)
    bluetooth2022leaudio

    Official source defining LE Audio, LC3 codec efficiency and Auracast broadcast audio.

  • 2022
    McRackan TR, Hand BN, Dubno JRDevelopment and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging SystemThe Laryngoscope

    Functional staging that frames realistic, individualised outcome expectations.

  • 2021
    Garcia C, Goehring T, Cosentino S, et al.The Panoramic ECAP Method: estimating patient-specific patterns of current spread and neural health in cochlear implant usersJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 22(5):567–589

    Panoramic ECAP — patient-specific current spread and neural-health estimation.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions, Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2021
    World Health OrganizationWorld Report on HearingWorld Health Organization, Geneva; Executive summary

    Global burden of hearing loss: >1.5 billion affected, 430 million disabling, 2.5 billion projected by 2050.

    Cited in: Overview — the hearing pathway, Overview — counting hearing loss, Measuring the burden — grades, prevalence & DALYs, The global picture & projections to 2050, The cost — economic, educational & cognitive, Prevention & the cochlear-implant access gap

  • 2021
    GBD 2019 Hearing Loss CollaboratorsHearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990–2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019The Lancet; 397(10278):996–1009

    1.57 billion people lived with hearing loss in 2019 (1 in 5); hearing loss is the third-largest cause of years lived with disability worldwide.

    Cited in: Overview — counting hearing loss, Measuring the burden — grades, prevalence & DALYs, The global picture & projections to 2050

  • 2021
    Perkins E, Dietrich MS, Manzoor N, et alFurther evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy criteriaOtology & Neurotology; 42(6):815–823

    Modern evidence that adults outside traditional criteria benefit from implantation, supporting the continued expansion of candidacy.

    Cited in: How the criteria evolved, The expanding indications

  • 2021
    Shin S, Kim JH, Jeong J, et alManufacturable 32-channel cochlear electrode array and preliminary assessment of its feasibility for clinical useMicromachines; 12(7):778

    Laser-patterned 32-channel array from Korea's TODOC (the SULLIVAN system) — more physical contacts than any commercial device, aimed at a lower price point.

    Cited in: The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes

  • 2021
    Luo X, Wu CC, Pulling KCombining current focusing and steering in a cochlear implant processing strategyInternational Journal of Audiology; 60(3):232-237

    Combined current focusing + steering strategy.

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2021
    GBD 2019 Hearing Loss Collaborators (Haile LM, et al.; senior authors Murray CJL, Davis AC, Vos T, Chadha S)Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019The Lancet, 397(10278): 996-1009

    DOI confirmed via Crossref and Europe PMC. CANDIDATE METADATA CORRECTED: original title ('Global Hearing Loss Burden...') and authors (Tucci DL, Merson MH, Wilson BS) did not match the live record. The paper is authored as 'GBD 2019 Hearing Loss Collaborators' (first listed author Lydia M. Haile); Tucci/Merson/Wilson are not in the cited byline. Year corrected 2020 -> 2021.

  • 2021
    McRackan TR, Reddy P, Costello MS, Dubno JRRole of Pre-Operative Patient Expectations in Adult Cochlear Implant OutcomesOtology & Neurotology, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. e130-e136

    Paper is real but candidate metadata was largely wrong. Candidate DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002548 points to an unrelated paper ('Diagnosis of Cochlear Implant Infection With Gallium SPECT'). Candidate PMID 32132449 points to an unrelated pediatric-orthopedics scoliosis paper. CORRECTED via PMC8316998: real DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002873, PMID 33229876, year 2021 (not 2020), Vol 42 Issue 2 pp e130-e136, authors McRackan TR, Reddy P, Costello MS, Dubno JR (candidate's 'Hand BN, Velozo CA, et al.' was wrong). Title confirmed.

  • 2021
    Rasmussen KMB, West N, Tian L, Cayé-Thomasen PLong-Term Vestibular Outcomes in Cochlear Implant RecipientsFrontiers in Neurology, 12:686681

    Title/journal/volume/year/DOI confirmed via Crossref and Europe PMC (PMID 34456848). CANDIDATE AUTHORS WERE WRONG: real authors are Rasmussen KMB, West N, Tian L, Cayé-Thomasen P (not Chandra/Singh/Mertes). Authors corrected.

  • 2021
    Sagiv D, Yaar-Soffer Y, Yakir Z, Henkin Y, Shapira YRates, indications, and speech perception outcomes of revision cochlear implantationsJournal of Clinical Medicine; 10(15):3215

    Contemporary revision rates, indications and outcomes.

  • 2021
    Vittoria S, Lahlou G, Torres R, et al.Robot-based assistance in middle ear surgery and cochlear implantation: first clinical reportEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 278(1):77–85

    First clinical report of RobOtol-assisted insertion.

  • 2021
    Riojas KE, Tran ET, Freeman MH, Noble JH, Webster RJ, Labadie RFClinical translation of an insertion tool for minimally invasive cochlear implant surgeryJournal of Medical Devices; 15(2):021008

    Insertion tool for image-guided minimally invasive (percutaneous) cochlear implantation.

  • 2021
    Deep NL, Purcell PL, Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Roland JT, Waltzman SBCochlear implantation in infants: evidence of safetyTrends in Hearing; 25:23312165211014695

    Safety review supporting infant cochlear implantation.

  • 2021
    Chweya CM, et al.Prevalence of surgical, anesthetic, and device-related complications among infants implanted before 9 and 12 months versus older childrenOtology & Neurotology; 42(6):e666-e674
    PMID 33710142chweya2021

    Complication rates in infants comparable to older children.

  • 2021
    Patterson TE, Gonzalez VB, Carron JDCochlear implantation in patients with Pendred syndromeAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology; 42(6):103087

    Favourable CI outcomes in Pendred/EVA despite incomplete partition.

  • 2021
    Dwyer RT, Chen C, Hehrmann P, Dwyer NC, Gifford RHSynchronized Automatic Gain Control in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients Yields Significant Benefit in Static and Dynamic Listening ConditionsTrends in Hearing; 25:23312165211014139

    Clinical demonstration that linking/synchronizing AGC across the two processors restores ILD and improves localization. Anchors module 13 (research on synchronized processors) and module 15 (binaural future).

  • 2021
    Jwair S, Prins A, Wegner I, Stokroos RJ, Versnel H, Thomeer HGXMScalar translocation comparison between lateral wall and perimodiolar cochlear implant arrays - a meta-analysisThe Laryngoscope; 131(5):1142-1149

    Meta-analysis: perimodiolar precurved arrays translocate from scala tympani more often than lateral-wall straight arrays.

  • 2021
    Torres R, Daoudi H, Lahlou G, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Mosnier I, Nguyen YRestoration of High Frequency Auditory Perception After Robot-Assisted or Manual Cochlear Implantation in Profoundly Deaf Adults Improves Speech RecognitionFrontiers in Surgery; 8:729736

    RobOtol group: high-frequency perception and speech outcomes after robot-assisted vs manual insertion. Supports atraumaticity-to-outcome link.

  • 2021
    McLean WJ, Hinton AS, Herby JTJ, Salt AN, Hartsock JJ, Wilson S, et al.Improved Speech Intelligibility in Subjects With Stable Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Intratympanic Dosing of FX-322 in a Phase 1b StudyOtology & Neurotology; 42(7):e849-e857

    Early-phase trial of a Notch/Wnt small-molecule (FX-322) intended to regenerate hair cells; later phase 2 studies did not meet endpoints.

  • 2021
    Brotto D, Sorrentino F, Cenedese R, Avato I, Bovo R, Trevisi P, Manara RGenetics of Inner Ear Malformations: A ReviewAudiology Research; 11(4):524-536

    Maps genes to malformation phenotypes: SLC26A4-EVA/IP-II, POU3F4-IP-III, FGF3-LAMM/labyrinthine aplasia, CHD7-CHARGE, EYA1/SIX1-BOR, SOX10-Waardenburg/PCWH. Spine of the gene-to-shape module.

  • 2021
    D'Onofrio KL, Gifford RHBimodal benefit for music perception: effect of acoustic bandwidthJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 64(4):1341-1353

    Bimodal music perception improves with increasing acoustic bandwidth; wideband contralateral amplification is most beneficial for music quality.

  • 2021
    Nagy R, Perényi Á, Dimák B, Csanády M, Kiss J, Rovó LDetection of "tip fold-over" of the cochlear implant electrode array with transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurementOrvosi Hetilap; 162(25):988-996

    Intraoperative TIM detects malposition before wound closure, reducing radiation exposure relative to radiography.

  • 2021
    O'Leary SJ, Choi J, Brady K, Matthews S, Ozdowska KB, Payne M, McLean T, Rousset A, Lo J, Creber N, Tari S, Dowell R, Briggs RSystemic methylprednisolone for hearing preservation during cochlear implant surgery: a double blinded placebo-controlled trialHearing Research; 404:108224

    RCT of high-dose systemic steroid for hearing preservation; nuance on pharmacological protection at surgery.

  • 2021
    Marx M, Mosnier I, Venail F, Mondain M, Uziel A, Bakhos D, Lescanne E, N'Guyen Y, Bernardeschi D, Sterkers O, Deguine O, Lepage B, Godey B, Schmerber S, Bonne NX, Vincent C, Fraysse BCochlear Implantation and Other Treatments in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Results of a National Multicenter Study Including a Randomized Controlled TrialAudiology and Neurotology; 26(6):414-424

    French national multicenter study + RCT comparing CI vs CROS/BCD/abstention in SSD/AHL; CI superior for QoL and tinnitus; CROS/BCD do not treat tinnitus. Verified PubMed.

  • 2021
    Chow MR, Ayiotis AI, Schoo DP, Gimmon Y, Lane KE, Morris BJ, Rahman MA, Valentin NS, Boutros PJ, Bowditch SP, Ward BK, Sun DQ, Trevino Guajardo C, Schubert MC, Carey JP, Della Santina CCPosture, gait, quality of life, and hearing with a vestibular implantNew England Journal of Medicine; 384(6):521-532

    Pivotal 8-patient Johns Hopkins trial: chronic continuous motion-modulated stimulation improved posture, gait and quality of life.

  • 2021
    Ellsperman SE, Nairn EM, Stucken EZReview of Bone Conduction Hearing DevicesAudiology Research

    Concise overview of bone-conduction device classes and their indications, anchoring the spectrum view.

  • 2021
    Cywka KB, Skarzynski H, Krol B, Skarzynski PHThe Bonebridge BCI 602 Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant in Children: Objective and Subjective BenefitsJournal of Clinical Medicine

    Paediatric outcomes and complication/revision rates for an active transcutaneous implant.

  • 2021
    Donato M, Santos R, Correia F, Escada PSingle-sided deafness: bone conduction devices or cochlear implantation? A systematic review with meta-analysisActa Otorrinolaringologica Espanola

    Pooled evidence that cochlear implantation outperforms bone-conduction rerouting in SSD.

  • 2021
    Peters JPM, van Heteren JAA, Wendrich AW, et alShort-term outcomes of cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness compared to bone conduction devices and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids (CINGLE-trial)PLoS One

    Informs the single-sided-deafness fork between routing devices and CI.

  • 2021
    Cywka KB, Krol B, Skarzynski PHEffectiveness of Bone Conduction Hearing Aids in Young Children with Congenital Aural Atresia and MicrotiaMedical Science Monitor

    Softband BCD outcomes and auditory development in young microtia/atresia children.

  • 2021
    Nijmeijer HGB, Keijsers NM, Huinck WJ, Mylanus EAMThe effect of cochlear implantation on autonomy, participation and work in postlingually deafened adults: a scoping reviewEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Evidence that implantation generally benefits adult autonomy, participation and work.

  • 2021
    Goffi-Gomez MVS, Muniz L, Wiemes G, Onuki LC, Calonga L, et alContribution of noise reduction pre-processing and microphone directionality strategies in the speech recognition in noise in adult cochlear implant usersEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Separates and combines the contributions of noise reduction and directionality in adults.

  • 2021
    Potts LG, Jang S, Hillis CLEvaluation of Automatic Directional Processing with Cochlear Implant RecipientsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Shows automatic directionality approaches the benefit of correctly hand-selected directional programs.

  • 2021
    Eichenauer A, Baumann U, Stover T, Weissgerber TInterleaved Acoustic Environments: Impact of an Auditory Scene Classification Procedure on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant UsersTrends in Hearing

    Evidence on automatic scene classification, the springboard for smarter future scene analysis.

  • 2020
    Carlson MLCochlear Implantation in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine; 382(16):1531–1542

    Authoritative clinical review of adult cochlear implantation for general context.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale

  • 2020
    Zarowski A, Molisz A, Cardinael E, et al.Prediction of behavioral T/C levels in cochlear implant patients based upon analysis of electrode impedancesJournal of the American Academy of Audiology; 31(9):674–679

    Electrode impedances predict behavioural T/C levels — a foundation for data-driven, objective fitting.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2020
    Kim JSElectrocochleography in cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing: a systematic reviewInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; 17(19):7043

    Systematic review of ECochG (including post-implant) in residual-hearing CI users.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2020
    Dieter A, Keppeler D, Moser TTowards the optical cochlear implant: optogenetic approaches for hearing restorationEMBO Molecular Medicine; 12(4):e11618

    Authoritative translational review of optical/optogenetic cochlear implants.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2020
  • 2020
    Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al.Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet CommissionThe Lancet; 396(10248):413–446

    Mid-life hearing loss is the single largest potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia (~8% of population-attributable risk).

    Cited in: Overview — counting hearing loss, The cost — economic, educational & cognitive

  • 2020
    The WeekMake in India: DRDO's foray into hearing implants, exoskeletons and prostheticsThe Week (news report)
    external linkdrdoimplant2020

    News report on the DRDO/SBMT effort to realise A.P.J. Abdul Kalam's vision of an affordable (~₹1 lakh) indigenous 'bionic ear', after the Kalam–Raju stent; detailed, verified device information and outcomes remain limited.

    Cited in: The implant goes global

  • 2020
    US Food and Drug AdministrationCochlear implant device approvals and labelling (indications for use)US FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health
    external linkfdaCiLabeling

    Device approvals set indications that guide clinicians; they are not mandates, so evidence-based off-label implantation is legal — but reimbursement rules then bind. Labels differ by manufacturer and change over time; figures in the text are illustrative and should be checked against current device IFUs.

  • 2020
    Keidser G, Naylor G, Brungart DS, et alThe quest for ecological validity in hearing science: what it is, why it matters, and how to advance itEar and Hearing; 41 Suppl 1:5S–19S

    Defines ecological validity in hearing testing and motivates spatially-separated, fluctuating, real-world test scenarios over quiet/steady-noise tasks.

    Cited in: Speech-in-noise & valid testing, Tele-audiology & the future

  • 2020
    Kaufmann CR, Henslee AM, Claussen A, Hansen MREvaluation of insertion forces and cochlea trauma following robotics-assisted cochlear implant electrode array insertionOtology & Neurotology; 41(5):631–638

    Cadaveric comparison: lower, less-variable insertion forces with robotic assistance.

  • 2020
    Zheng D, Liu XCochlear implantation outcomes in patients with OTOF mutationsFrontiers in Neuroscience; 14:447

    Excellent CI outcomes in presynaptic OTOF-related auditory neuropathy.

  • 2020
    U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationApproval lowering the indicated age for cochlear implantation to 9 monthsFDA premarket approval supplement; March 2020; children 9-24 months with bilateral profound SNHL
    fda2020

    FDA lowered the minimum CI age to 9 months.

  • 2020
    Van Horn A, Hayden C, Mahairas AD, Leader P, Bush MLFactors Influencing Aberrant Facial Nerve Stimulation Following Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisOtology & Neurotology; 41(8):1050-1059

    Meta-analysis of 37 studies / 5694 patients; overall aberrant FNS rate 5.6% (range 0.68-43%); lateral-wall arrays OR 3.92 vs perimodiolar; otosclerosis OR 13.73 (rate ~26%); malformations highest at 28%; reprogramming +/- deactivation usually successful, only 4 explants.

  • 2020
    Mittmann P, Lauer G, Ernst A, Mutze S, Hassepass F, Arndt S, Arweiler-Harbeck D, Christov FElectrophysiological detection of electrode fold-over in perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays: a multi-center study case seriesEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 277(1):31-35

    Spread-of-excitation / field telemetry identifies fold-over intraoperatively before closure, reducing radiation.

  • 2020
    Luryi AL, Tower JI, Preston J, Burkland A, Trueheart CE, Hildrew DMCochlear Implant Mapping Through Telemedicine-A Feasibility StudyOtology & Neurotology; 41(3):e330-e333

    Remote mapping yielded hearing outcomes comparable to in-person programming.

  • 2020
    Leake PA, Akil O, Lang HNeurotrophin gene therapy to promote survival of spiral ganglion neurons after deafnessHearing Research; 394:107955

    Review: AAV-delivered BDNF/NT-3 improves SGN survival and the neural substrate for an implant.

  • 2020
    Dieter A, Keppeler D, Moser TTowards the optical cochlear implant: optogenetic approaches for hearing restorationEMBO Molecular Medicine; 12(4):e11618

    Key review. Optogenetic stimulation 1.74-fold more spatially confined than monopolar electrical; up to 2.04-fold vs bipolar. AAV gene therapy to render SGNs light-sensitive.

  • 2020
    Keppeler D, Schwaerzle M, Harczos T, et al.Multichannel optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway using microfabricated LED cochlear implants in rodentsScience Translational Medicine; 12(553):eabb8086

    Microfabricated multichannel micro-LED array (up to 144 addressable uLEDs of 60x60 um); demonstrated channel-distinct activation in rodents.

  • 2020
    O'Leary S, Briggs R, Gerard JM, et al.Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month OutcomesOtology & Neurotology; 41(9):1222-1229

    A >=30% reduction in ECochG amplitude during insertion predicted poorer hearing preservation at 3 and 12 months, especially 250-1000 Hz.

  • 2020
    van de Berg R, Ramos A, van Rompaey V, Bisdorff A, Perez-Fornos A, Rubinstein JT, Phillips JO, Strupp M, Della Santina CC, Guinand NThe vestibular implant: opinion statement on implantation criteria for researchJournal of Vestibular Research; 30(3):213-223

    Candidacy criteria for vestibular implantation: disabling bilateral vestibulopathy with objective vHIT/caloric/rotatory-chair deficits.

  • 2020
    Mattingly JK, Banakis Hartl RM, Jenkins HA, Tollin DJ, et alA Comparison of Intracochlear Pressures During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Stimulation With a Bone Conduction ImplantEar and Hearing

    Direct measurement of how bone stimulation reaches both cochleae and the cross-skull loss.

  • 2020
    Oberlies NR, Castano JE, Freiser ME, McCoy JL, Shaffer ADOutcomes of BAHA Connect vs BAHA Attract in pediatric patientsInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

    Pediatric head-to-head showing the gain-versus-complications trade-off of Attract.

  • 2020
    Persson AC, Reinfeldt S, Hakansson B, Eeg-Olofsson MThree-year follow-up with the bone conduction implantAudiology & Neurotology

    Longer-term active transcutaneous bone-conduction outcome data.

  • 2020
    Banakis Hartl RM, Jenkins HAImplantable Hearing Aids: Where are we in 2020?Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    doi:10.1002/lio2.495PMID 33364411bankaishartl2020implantable

    Reviews totally implantable devices and the convergence with cochlear implants.

  • 2020
    McKay CMApplications of Phenomenological Loudness Models to Cochlear ImplantsFrontiers in Psychology

    Modern synthesis of how electric loudness is modelled and integrated, central to setting levels.

  • 2020
    Ontario Health (Quality)Auditory Brainstem Implantation for Adults With Neurofibromatosis 2 or Severe Cochlear or Cochlear Nerve DeficiencyOntario Health Technology Assessment Series
    PMID 32190165ontario2020abi

    Summarises evolving indications across NF2 and non-tumour adults.

  • 2020
    Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Mikolajewska L, Kunert P, Niemczyk KDetailed insight in intraoperative eABR measurements to assist auditory brainstem implantation in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2Acta Neurologica Belgica

    Worked example of using eABR peak counts to steer paddle position intraoperatively.

  • 2020
    Sennaroglu L, Yarali M, Sennaroglu G, et al.Simultaneous Cochlear and Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Children With Severe Inner Ear MalformationsOtology & Neurotology

    Illustrates combining CI and ABI while still preferring the nerve where present.

  • 2020
    Wallis JMIs it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child?Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

    Recent philosophical analysis weighing autonomy against the open-future objection.

  • 2020
    Dwyer RT, Roberts J, Gifford RHEffect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound ProcessorsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Shows microphone configuration and source location together shift effective SNR by several dB.

  • 2020
    Holder JT, Taylor AL, Sunderhaus LW, Gifford RHEffect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant RecipientsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Confirms microphone location (canal-entrance vs behind-the-ear) significantly affects speech recognition.

  • 2020
    Buchner A, Schwebs M, Lenarz TSpeech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environmentsCochlear Implants International

    Links beamforming to reduced listening effort, not just word scores.

  • 2020
    Chung KPerceived sound quality of different signal processing algorithms by cochlear implant listeners in real-world acoustic environmentsJournal of Communication Disorders

    Shows recipients prefer adaptive directional plus noise reduction in real noisy scenes but not in quiet.

  • 2020
    Wolfe JCochlear Implants: Audiologic Management and Considerations for Implantable Hearing Devices (Physics of induction coils and loops; hearing assistive technology)Plural Publishing
    wolfe2020physics

    Primary text grounding for telecoil/induction-loop physics and HAT delivery routes for CI recipients.

  • 2020
    Convery E, Keidser G, McLelland M, Groth JA Smartphone App to Facilitate Remote Patient-Provider Communication in Hearing Health Care: Usability and Effect on OutcomesTelemedicine and e-Health

    Evidence that smartphone apps support remote clinician communication and outcomes.

  • 2019
    Giardina CK, Brown KD, Adunka OF, et al.Intracochlear electrocochleography: response patterns during cochlear implantation and hearing preservationEar and Hearing; 40(4):833–848

    Intracochlear ECochG response patterns and trauma during insertion.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2019
    Mao D, Innes-Brown H, Petoe MA, et al.Fully objective hearing threshold estimation in cochlear implant users using phase-locking value growth functionsHearing Research; 377:24–33

    A fully objective eASSR-based threshold-estimation method — relevant to automated fitting.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2019
    Yang T, Guo L, Wang L, et al.Diagnosis, intervention, and prevention of genetic hearing lossAdvances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; 1130:73–92

    ≈50% of childhood hearing loss is genetic; ~70% non-syndromic / ~30% syndromic.

    Cited in: Overview — the hearing pathway

  • 2019
    Butcher E, Dezateux C, Cortina-Borja M, et al.Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing loss detected at the universal newborn hearing screen: systematic review and meta-analysisPLoS One; 14(7):e0219600

    Screen-detected permanent childhood hearing loss ≈1.1 per 1,000.

    Cited in: Overview — the hearing pathway

  • 2019
    Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, et alClinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update)Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 161(1_suppl):S1–S45

    Current clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss — the otologic emergency among the causes.

    Cited in: Sudden & autoimmune hearing loss

  • 2019
    Franco-Vidal V, Parietti-Winkler C, Guevara N, et alThe Oticon Medical Neuro Zti cochlear implant and the Neuro 2 sound processor: multicentric evaluation of outcomes in adults and childrenInternational Journal of Audiology; 59(2):153–160

    Multicentre outcomes for the Oticon Medical (Neurelec) Neuro Zti, the 20-electrode lateral-wall system whose cochlear-implant business was divested to Cochlear in 2024.

    Cited in: The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes

  • 2019
    Hoffman MF, Cejas I, Quittner ALHealth-Related Quality of Life Instruments for Children With Cochlear Implants: Development of Child and Parent-Proxy MeasuresEar and Hearing, 40(3):592-604; 40(3):592-604

    The candidate TITLE matches a real paper (PMID 30059365), but the candidate's AUTHORS (Loy, Warner-Czyz, Tong, Tobey, Birkun), YEAR (2018), and locator (39(2):127-140) were all WRONG/fabricated. The actual paper is by Hoffman MF, Cejas I, Quittner AL, Ear & Hearing 2019, 40(3):592-604. Re-keyed to hoffman2019 and metadata corrected to the verified record.

  • 2019
    McRackan TR, Hand BN, Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Development Consortium, Velozo CA, Dubno JRCochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global)Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(9):3554-3563; 62(9):3554-3563

    Chapter 18 reference (mcrackan2019).

  • 2019
    Siu JM, Blaser SI, Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Cushing SLEfficacy of a selective imaging paradigm prior to pediatric cochlear implantationThe Laryngoscope; 129(9):2153-2161

    Validates a selective imaging paradigm (MRI first, CT only when indicated) before paediatric cochlear implantation.

  • 2019
    Gautschi-Mills K, Khoza-Shangase K, Pillay DPreservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery: an exploration of residual hearing function in a group of recipients at cochlear implant unitsBrazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 85(3):310-318

    Candidate DOI 10.1159/000498699 is invalid (Crossref 404) and source (Audiology and Neurotology) was wrong. The real paper with this title is Gautschi-Mills et al., Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2019;85(3):310-318 (PMID 29631897, DOI verified). Candidate authors (Williams/Prasad/Hoa) were wrong; corrected.

  • 2019
    Messersmith JJ, Entwisle L, Warren S, Scott MClinical Practice Guidelines: Cochlear ImplantsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 827-844

    Candidate gave no identifier and a generic corporate-author/title. Found the actual peer-reviewed guideline (American Academy of Audiology task force): Messersmith, Entwisle, Warren & Scott, J Am Acad Audiol 2019. Confirmed via EuropePMC (DOI 10.3766/jaaa.19088, PMID 31823835).

  • 2019
    Caversaccio M, Wimmer W, Anso J, et al.Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: first in manPLoS One; 14(8):e0220543

    First-in-human image-guided robotic facial-recess drilling (HEARO).

  • 2019
    McRackan TR, Hand BN, Velozo CA, Dubno JRCochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): development of a profile instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a global measure (CIQOL-10 Global)Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 62(9):3554-3563

    Modern CI-specific patient-reported outcome instrument.

  • 2019
    U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationApproval of a cochlear implant system for single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss (first U.S. indication)FDA premarket approval; approved July 2019; ages 5 and older
    fda2019ssd

    First U.S. regulatory approval of CI for SSD/AHL.

  • 2019
    Cuda D, Murri A, Mainardi A, Chalupper JEffectiveness and efficiency of a dedicated bimodal fitting formulaAudiology Research; 9(1):219

    Manufacturer-coordinated bimodal fitting formula (Adaptive Phonak/APD-type) aligning HA loudness growth and AGC to the CI.

  • 2019
    Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGWSimulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differencesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 145(4):2009-2024

    Independent (unlinked) AGC in each processor distorts ILD, the one binaural cue CI users can use; quantifies the localization error introduced. Anchors module 13.

  • 2019
    Braun K, Walker K, Sürth W, Löwenheim H, Tropitzsch ATriphasic Pulses in Cochlear Implant Patients With Facial Nerve StimulationOtology & Neurotology; 40(10):1268-1277

    Retrospective case review of 15 CI patients with FNS; triphasic pulse stimulation significantly reduced unintended FNS while preserving speech performance; QoL improved in most.

  • 2019
    Cooper T, Hildrew D, McAfee JS, Piatt BK, Branstetter B, McCall AA, Hirsch BEOptimization of intraoperative imaging protocol to confirm placement of cochlear implant electrodesOtology & Neurotology; 40(5):625-629

    Practical modified-Stenvers portable radiograph protocol for intraoperative confirmation.

  • 2019
    Caversaccio M, Wimmer W, Anso J, Mantokoudis G, Gerber N, Rathgeb C, Schneider D, Hermann J, Wagner F, Scheidegger O, Huth M, Anschuetz L, Kompis M, Williamson T, Bell B, Gavaghan K, Weber SRobotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in manPLoS One; 14(8):e0220543

    Bern first-in-man robotic CI: nine patients, robotically drilled keyhole tunnel to the round window, intraoperative imaging to confirm distance to facial nerve; all successfully implanted.

  • 2019
    Grover M, Sharma S, Preetam C, Gupta G, Samdani S, Agarwal S, Singh SN, Sharma MPNew SMS classification of cochleovestibular malformation and its impact on decision-makingThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology; 133(5):368–375

    The SMS (size–modiolus–septum / sieve) classification — grades the cochleovestibular malformation on the morphology of the cochlea, modiolus and lamina cribrosa to guide surgical decision making.

  • 2019
    Vandali A, Dawson P, Au A, Yu Y, Brown M, Goorevich M, Cowan REvaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant RecipientsEar and Hearing; 40(3):555-567

    OPAL strategy enhances F0 pitch cues for music, voice pitch and lexical tone; fine-structure / pitch-oriented coding.

  • 2019
    Gfeller K, Driscoll V, Schwalje ABeyond technology: the interaction of perceptual accuracy and experiential factors in pediatric music engagementOtology & Neurotology; 40(3):e290-e297

    Pitch-ranking accuracy predicts sustained music-lesson participation, but family musical involvement has an even greater impact on sustained engagement.

  • 2019
    Parkinson AJ, Rubinstein JT, Drennan WR, Dodson C, Nie KHybrid music perception outcomes: implications for melody and timbre recognition in cochlear implant recipientsOtology & Neurotology; 40(3):e283-e289

    Simulation study: melody recognition acoustic 73.5%, electric-acoustic 67.9%, electric-alone 39.2%; low-frequency acoustic hearing drives the hybrid melody advantage.

  • 2019
    Jiam NT, Deroche ML, Jiradejvong P, Limb CJA randomized controlled crossover study of the impact of online music training on pitch and timbre perception in cochlear implant usersJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 20(3):247-262

    Online home-based music training improved pitch discrimination and instrument identification; control audiobook arm also improved pitch.

  • 2019
    Allam A, Eldegwi AEfficacy of using NRT thresholds in cochlear implants fitting, in prelingual pediatric patientsJournal of Otology; 14(4):128-135

    NRT/ECAP thresholds significantly predict behavioural T and C levels in prelingual children; supports using the intraoperative ECAP profile as a starting MAP.

  • 2019
    Kloostra FJJ, Verbist J, Hofman R, Free RH, Arnold R, van Dijk PA Prospective Study of the Effect of Cochlear Implantation on TinnitusAudiology and Neurotology; 23(6):356-363
    doi:10.1159/000495132PMID 30739109kloostra2019prospective

    Prospective (n=44, 66% with preop tinnitus). CI reduced tinnitus/handicap in >=28%; persisted in 72%; no new-onset in this cohort; negative effects linked to low preop tinnitus/handicap. Verified PubMed.

  • 2019
    Boutros PJ, Schoo DP, Rahman M, Valentin NS, Chow MR, Ayiotis AI, Morris BJ, Hofner A, Rascon AM, Marx A, Deas R, Fridman GY, Davidovics NS, Ward BK, Treviño C, Bowditch SP, Roberts DC, Lane KE, Gimmon Y, Schubert MC, Carey JP, Della Santina CCContinuous vestibular implant stimulation partially restores eye-stabilizing reflexesJCI Insight; 4(22):e128397

    Chronic 24/7 motion-modulated stimulation over 350-812 days produced stable VOR aligned with head-rotation axis; demonstrated long-term feasibility.

  • 2019
    Gawecki W, Balcerowiak A, Kalinowicz E, et al.Evaluation of surgery and surgical results of Baha AttractBrazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

    Surgical technique and audiological results for the passive magnet Baha Attract.

  • 2019
    Seidman MD, Janz TA, Shohet JATotally Implantable Active Middle Ear ImplantsOtolaryngologic Clinics of North America

    Review of fully implantable active middle-ear implant designs, microphone and battery issues.

  • 2019
    Magele A, Schoerg P, Stanek B, Gradl B, Sprinzl GMActive transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysisPLoS One

    Pooled functional gain and speech outcomes for active transcutaneous BCDs.

  • 2019
    Spencer NJ, Tillery KH, Brown CAThe Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant ListeningEar and Hearing

    Quantifies how dynamic-range AGC affects speech in a masker, the core clinical trade-off.

  • 2019
    Grimm R, Pettinato M, Gillis S, Daelemans WSimulating speech processing with cochlear implants: How does channel interaction affect learning in neural networks?PLoS One

    Modelling work illustrating how channel interaction degrades the information available for speech learning.

  • 2019
    Wong K, Kozin ED, Kanumuri VV, Vachicouras N, Tabsho J, Lacour SP, Lee DJAuditory Brainstem Implants: Recent Progress and Future PerspectivesFrontiers in Neuroscience

    Reviews the historical arc and the modern state of the device.

  • 2019
    Deep NL, Choudhury B, Roland JTAuditory Brainstem Implantation: An OverviewJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B

    Concise overview of indications and how the ABI complements the CI.

  • 2019
    Sorkin DLImpact of Medicaid on Cochlear Implant AccessOtology and Neurotology
    PMID 30741915sorkin2019medicaid

    Shows how public insurance coverage changes who gets implanted.

  • 2019
    Dingemanse JG, Goedegebure AThe important role of contextual information in speech perception in cochlear implant usersTrends in Hearing

    Highlights how real conversation depends on context that the booth omits.

  • 2019
    Weissgerber T, Bandeira M, Brendel M, Stover T, Baumann UImpact of Microphone Configuration on Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users in Traffic NoiseOtology and Neurotology

    Real-world-style noise showing configuration-dependent benefit and limits.

  • 2019
    Hey M, Hocke T, Bohnke B, Mauger SJForwardFocus with cochlear implant recipients in spatially separated and fluctuating competing signals - introduction of a reference metricInternational Journal of Audiology

    Evaluates an automatic spatial-noise directional feature in separated and fluctuating noise.

  • 2019
    McRackan TR, Hand BN, Velozo CA, Dubno JRDevelopment of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item BankEar and Hearing

    Item bank spanning communication and social domains relevant to repair and self-advocacy.

  • 2019
    Han C, O'Sullivan J, Luo Y, Herrero J, Mehta AD, Mesgarani NSpeaker-independent auditory attention decoding without access to clean speech sourcesScience Advances

    Pairs deep speaker separation with attention decoding for a cognitively controlled hearing device.

  • 2018
    Rebscher SJ, Zhou DD, Zeng FG, et al.Development and clinical introduction of the Nurotron cochlear implant electrode arrayThe Journal of International Advanced Otology; 14(3):392–400

    Design and clinical introduction of the Nurotron Venus array — context for the broader, more equitable manufacturer landscape.

    Cited in: The implant goes global, The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes, Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2018
    De Andrade KCL, Muniz LF, Menezes PL, et al.The value of electrically evoked stapedius reflex in determining the maximum comfort level of a cochlear implantJournal of the American Academy of Audiology; 29(4):292–299

    ESRT as an objective anchor for the comfortable / upper-stimulation level in programming.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2018
    Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of IndiaNational Programme for Prevention and Control of Deafness (NPPCD) — operational guidelinesGovernment of India, New Delhi; Programme launched as a pilot in 2006–07

    India's national deafness-control programme: prevention, early identification, manpower training and service delivery through the public health system.

    Cited in: Newborn & infant hearing screening, Prevention & the cochlear-implant access gap

  • 2018
    Rebscher SJ, Zhou DD, Zeng FGDevelopment and clinical introduction of the Nurotron cochlear implant electrode arrayJournal of International Advanced Otology; 14(3):392–400

    Account of China's first domestically developed cochlear implant (Nurotron Venus), its electrode array, and the academic–industry collaboration behind it.

    Cited in: The implant goes global, The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes, Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2018
    Rebscher SJ, Zhou DD, Zeng FGDevelopment and clinical introduction of the Nurotron cochlear implant electrode arrayThe Journal of International Advanced Otology; 14(3):392–400

    Design and clinical introduction of China's Nurotron Venus 24-electrode lateral-wall array — a lower-cost device for low- and middle-income settings.

    Cited in: The implant goes global, The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes, Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2018
    Hänsel T, Gauger U, Bernhard N, Behzadi N, Romo Ventura ME, Hofmann V, Olze H, Knopke S, Todt I, Coordes AMeta-analysis of subjective complaints of vertigo and vestibular tests after cochlear implantationLaryngoscope 2018;128(9):2110-2123; 128(9):2110-2123

    Overall vertigo 9.3%, new-onset 17.4%, persisting 7.2%; cochleostomy worse than round window; rises with age.

    Cited in: Falls and the Older Recipient

  • 2018
    Greene NT, Mattingly JK, Banakis Hartl RM, Tollin DJ, Cass SPLateral semicircular canal pressures during cochlear implant electrode insertion: a possible mechanism for postoperative vestibular lossOtol Neurotol 2018;39(6):e508-e514; 39(6):e508-e514

    Cadaveric pressure transients up to ~169 dB SPL peak, higher in lateral SCC than cochlea, at acoustic-trauma levels.

    Cited in: How Implant Surgery Injures the Labyrinth

  • 2018
    Jin L, Tellez P, Chia R, Lu D, Chadha NK, Pauwels J, Dobson S, Al Eid H, Kozak FKImproving vaccination uptake in pediatric Cochlear implant recipientsJournal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 47(1):56

    PMID confirmed but candidate metadata was wrong: authors are Jin L et al. (NOT Peng/Abdo/Rivas) and pages are article 56 (NOT 76). Corrected.

  • 2018
    Pires JS, Melo AS, Caiado R, Martins JH, Moura JE, Silva LFFacial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation: Our experience in 448 adult patientsCochlear Implants International, 19(4)

    Title/journal/volume/issue/year confirmed via Europe PMC (PMID 29577849). CANDIDATE AUTHOR WAS WRONG: real first author is Pires JS (not Oliveira CA). Authors corrected.

  • 2018
    Wolfe JCochlear Implants: Audiologic Management and Considerations for Implantable Hearing DevicesPlural Publishing, San Diego

    Genuine textbook (single author Jace Wolfe). Confirmed via Plural Publishing/Amazon/Hearing Review. Corrected: candidate ISBN 978-1-59756-729-5 was WRONG (correct print ISBN 978-1-59756-892-0); candidate year 2020 was WRONG (1st edition published December 2018); 'et al.' removed (single author).

  • 2018
    Fagan JJ, Tarabichi MCochlear implants in developing countries: practical and ethical considerationsCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery; 26(3):188-189
    PMID 29553960fagan2018

    Barriers and ethics of CI access in low-resource settings.

  • 2018
    Davis TJ, Gifford RHSpatial Release From Masking in Adults With Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Effects of Distracter Azimuth and Microphone LocationJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 61(3):752-761

    Maps spatial release from masking as a function of target/distracter separation in 12 bilateral CI adults; SRM driven by head-shadow geometry.

  • 2018
    Jia H, Torres R, Nguyen Y, De Seta D, Ferrary E, Wu H, Sterkers O, Bernardeschi D, Mosnier IIntraoperative conebeam CT for assessment of intracochlear positioning of electrode arrays in adult recipients of cochlear implantsAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology; 39(4):768-774

    Intraoperative conebeam CT reliably detects misplacement/fold-over and measures insertion depth, enabling immediate revision before closure.

  • 2018
    Yeung J, Griffin A, Newton S, Kenna M, Licameli GRRevision cochlear implant surgery in children: Surgical and audiological outcomesLaryngoscope; 128(11):2619-2624
    doi:10.1002/lary.27198PMID 29729014yeung2018revisionchildren

    Paediatric revision; low surgical complication rate and excellent post-reimplantation audiological performance; device failure leading cause.

  • 2018
    Todt I, Rademacher G, Grupe G, Stratmann A, Ernst A, Mutze S, Mittmann PCochlear implants and 1.5 T MRI scans: the effect of diametrically bipolar magnets and screw fixation on painJournal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery; 47(1):11

    Diametric (self-aligning) bipolar magnets and screw fixation reduce pain and dislocation risk during 1.5T MRI.

  • 2018
    Calero D, Paul S, Gesing A, Alves F, Cordioli JAA technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devicesBioMedical Engineering OnLine; 17:23

    Technical review of transduction mechanisms/locations; subcutaneous mics damped by tissue and corrupted by body noise; MEMS accelerometers coupled to the ossicular chain proposed as the future (target <30 dB SPL equivalent input noise, 100 Hz-8 kHz).

  • 2018
    Lai YH, Tsao Y, Lu X, Chen F, Su YT, Chen KC, Su YH, Chen CH, Lee CHDeep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Approach to Improve Speech Intelligibility for Cochlear Implant RecipientsEar and Hearing; 39(4):795-809

    Noise classifier plus deep denoising autoencoder; improved speech intelligibility for Mandarin-speaking CI users across noise types.

  • 2018
    Wrobel C, Dieter A, Huet A, et al.Optogenetic stimulation of cochlear neurons activates the auditory pathway and restores auditory-driven behavior in deaf adult gerbilsScience Translational Medicine; 10(449):eaao0540

    Göttingen/Moser. Deafened adult gerbils, optical fiber light delivery restored auditory-driven behavior. Landmark proof-of-concept.

  • 2018
    Mager T, Lopez de la Morena D, Senn V, et al.High frequency neural spiking and auditory signaling by ultrafast red-shifted optogeneticsNature Communications; 9(1):1750

    f-Chrimson / vf-Chrimson fast red-shifted opsins driving SGN firing at several hundred Hz; red light scatters less, lower phototoxicity.

  • 2018
    Prevoteau C, Chen SY, Lalwani AKMusic enjoyment with cochlear implantationAuris Nasus Larynx; 45(5):895-902

    Review; perception-enjoyment disconnect; re-engineering/simplifying music can enhance enjoyment even when perception is poor.

  • 2018
    de Andrade KCL, Muniz LF, Menezes PL, Caldas Neto SS, Carnaúba ATL, Leal MCThe Value of Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex in Determining the Maximum Comfort Level of a Cochlear ImplantJournal of the American Academy of Audiology; 29(4):292-299

    ESRT correlates strongly with behavioural maximum comfort (C/M) levels and anchors upper stimulation levels.

  • 2018
    Jia H, Torres R, Nguyen Y, De Seta D, Ferrary E, Wu H, Sterkers O, Bernardeschi D, Mosnier IIntraoperative Conebeam CT for Assessment of Intracochlear Positioning of Electrode Arrays in Adult Recipients of Cochlear ImplantsAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology (AJNR); 39(4):768-774

    Intraoperative cone-beam CT (O-arm) reliably identifies misplacement/fold-over and quantifies insertion depth angle on the table.

  • 2018
    Lippmann E, Pritchett C, Ittner C, Hoff SRTranscutaneous osseointegrated implants for pediatric patientsJAMA Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery

    Pediatric transcutaneous magnet implant experience and skin-interface considerations.

  • 2018
    Stupak N, Padilla M, Morse RP, Landsberger DMPerceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional ScalingTrends in Hearing

    Psychophysical scaling of electric percepts including loudness dimension.

  • 2018
    Teagle HFB, Henderson L, He S, Ewend MG, Buchman CAPediatric auditory brainstem implantation: surgical, electrophysiologic, and behavioral outcomesEar Hear

    US programme detailing paediatric surgical and outcome experience.

  • 2018
    Eisenberg LS, Hammes Ganguly D, Martinez AS, Fisher LM, Winter ME, Glater JL, et alEarly communication development of children with auditory brainstem implantsJ Deaf Stud Deaf Educ
    doi:10.1093/deafed/eny010PMID 29718280eisenberg2018communication

    Communication trajectories that anchor realistic counselling.

  • 2018
    Sung JKK, Luk BPK, Wong TKC, Thong JF, Wong HT, Tong MCFPediatric auditory brainstem implantation: impact on audiological rehabilitation and tonal language developmentAudiol Neurootol

    Programming and rehabilitation realities in implanted children.

  • 2018
    Tampio AJF, Schroeder RJ, Wang D, Boyle J, Nicholas BDTrends in sociodemographic disparities of pediatric cochlear implantation over a 15-year periodInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

    Shows income gaps narrowing while racial disparities persist over time.

  • 2018
    Holder JT, Reynolds SM, Sunderhaus LW, Gifford RHCurrent profile of adults presenting for preoperative cochlear implant evaluationTrends in Hearing

    Documents the real-world profile of CI candidates and the role of in-noise testing.

  • 2018
    Croghan NBH, Smith ZMSpeech understanding with various maskers in cochlear-implant and simulated cochlear-implant hearing: effects of spectral resolution and implications for masking releaseTrends in Hearing

    Spectral-resolution limits that compound with reverberant smearing.

  • 2018
    Johnstone PM, Mills KET, Humphrey E, Yeager KR, Jones E, et alUsing Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear ImplantsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Demonstrates clinically that microphone choice changes speech-in-noise performance, including in children.

  • 2018
    Honeder C, Liepins R, Arnoldner C, Sinkovec H, Kaider A, et alFixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processorPLoS ONE

    Quantifies fixed (~4 dB) and adaptive (~6 dB) beamformer SRT gains over omnidirectional on a modern processor.

  • 2018
    Dingemanse JG, Goedegebure AOptimising the effect of noise reduction algorithm ClearVoice in cochlear implant users by increasing the maximum comfort levelsInternational Journal of Audiology

    Shows noise-reduction benefit is enhanced when combined with other parameter adjustments.

  • 2017
    He S, Teagle HFB, Buchman CAThe electrically evoked compound action potential: from laboratory to clinicFrontiers in Neuroscience; 11:339

    Comprehensive modern review of the ECAP — recording, measures, and clinical use.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, ECAP / Neural Response Telemetry, ECAP threshold & functions

  • 2017
    Wolfe J, Gilbert M, Schafer E, et al.Optimizations for the electrically-evoked stapedial reflex threshold measurement in cochlear implant recipientsEar and Hearing; 38(2):255–261

    Practical optimisation of ESRT measurement technique.

    Cited in: Stimulation Modes: From Monopolar to Tripolar, Dynamic Range and Electrode-to-Neuron Distance, Electrical stapedius reflex, Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2017
    Harris MS, Riggs WJ, Koka K, et al.Real-time intracochlear electrocochleography obtained directly through a cochlear implantOtology & Neurotology; 38(6):e107–e113

    Real-time intracochlear ECochG directly through the implant.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2017
    Gifford RH, Davis TJ, Sunderhaus LW, et al.Combined electric and acoustic stimulation with hearing preservation: effect of cochlear implant low-frequency cutoff on speech understanding and perceived listening difficultyEar and Hearing; 38(5):539–553

    Optimal acoustic–electric crossover/cutoff frequency in EAS recipients.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2017
    Peng KA, Kuan EC, Hagan S, et al.Cochlear nerve aplasia and hypoplasia: predictors of cochlear implant successOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 157(3):392–400

    Systematic review: hypoplasia outperforms aplasia for speech development after CI.

    Cited in: Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2017
    Li JN, Chen S, Zhai L, et alThe advances in hearing rehabilitation and cochlear implants in ChinaEar and Hearing; 38(6):647–652

    Review of the growth of cochlear implantation in China, including the domestic manufacturers (Nurotron, Listent) and the national programmes that drove access.

    Cited in: The implant goes global

  • 2017
    Sladen DP, Gifford RH, Haynes D, et alEvaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacyThe Laryngoscope; 127(10):2368–2374

    Evidence supporting a revised, more inclusive adult candidacy indication using monosyllabic word recognition — part of the steady expansion of who qualifies.

    Cited in: How the criteria evolved, Regulation & reimbursement

  • 2017
    Aschendorff A, Briggs R, Brademann G, et alClinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar ElectrodeAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 22(3):169–179

    Slim Modiolar (CI532) — insertion technique and a high rate of scala-tympani positioning.

    Cited in: Choosing a Nucleus Array: Perimodiolar vs Lateral Wall, The MED-EL Philosophy: Long, Flexible, Lateral-Wall

  • 2017
    Ping L, Wang N, Tang G, Lu T, Yin L, Tu W, Fu QJImplementation and preliminary evaluation of 'C-tone': A novel algorithm to improve lexical tone recognition in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant usersCochlear Implants International; 18(5):240-249

    c-tone algorithm later integrated in Nurotron APS.

    Cited in: The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2017
    Pascual S, Bonafonte A, Serrà JSEGAN: Speech Enhancement Generative Adversarial NetworkInterspeech 2017; pp. 3642-3646

    GAN-based speech enhancement for future AI coding.

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2017
    Ibrahim I, da Silva SD, Segal B, Zeitouni AEffect of cochlear implant surgery on vestibular function: meta-analysis studyJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;46(1):44; 46(1):44

    cVEMP/otolith abnormality up to 44% after CI.

    Cited in: How Implant Surgery Injures the Labyrinth

  • 2017
    Obrycka A, Lorens A, Padilla JL, et al.Validation of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire in cochlear implanted infants and toddlersInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology; 93:107-116

    Validation of the LittlEARS functional-listening questionnaire in CI children.

  • 2017
    Psillas G, et al.Cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: surgical and auditory outcomes with a brief on facial nerve stimulationOtology & Neurotology; 38(10):e377-e383
    PMID 28902803psillas2017

    Good speech outcomes in otosclerosis with elevated facial-nerve stimulation.

  • 2017
    Myhrum M, Strom-Roum H, Heldahl MG, et al.Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: outcome of the second implant and long-term useEar and Hearing; 38(3):301-313

    Second-ear performance and continued device use depend strongly on age at second implant and interimplant interval.

  • 2017
    van Zon A, Smulders YE, Ramakers GGJ, Stegeman I, Smit AL, Van Zanten GA, Stokroos RJ, Hendrice N, Free RH, Maat B, Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Mylanus EAM, Huinck WJ, Tange RA, Grolman WCost-Utility of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Controlled TrialOtology & Neurotology; 38(1):e57-e64

    Second implant became cost-effective only after roughly a 5-10 year horizon; higher incremental cost per QALY than the first implant.

  • 2017
    Crowson MG, Semenov YR, Tucci DL, Niparko JKQuality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants: A Narrative ReviewAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 22(4-5):236-258

    Reviewed 57 studies; first implant highly cost-effective, second implant incremental cost-utility weaker and region-dependent.

  • 2017
    Devocht EMJ, Janssen AML, Chalupper J, Stokroos RJ, George ELJThe Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound QualityTrends in Hearing; 21:2331216517727900
    doi:10.1177/2331216517727900PMID 28874096devocht2017bimodaldimensions

    Bimodal aiding improves intelligibility, reduces listening effort and improves sound quality beyond intelligibility alone.

  • 2017
    Zuniga MG, Rivas A, Hedley-Williams A, Gifford RH, Dwyer R, Dawant BM, Sunderhaus LW, Hovis KL, Wanna GB, Noble JH, Labadie RFTip fold-over in cochlear implantation: case seriesOtology & Neurotology; 38(2):199-206

    Tip fold-over incidence ~2% (6/303 ears); spread of excitation supported the diagnosis, electric-field imaging localized the fold; precurved arrays over-represented.

  • 2017
    Abouzayd M, Smith PF, Moreau S, Hitier MWhat vestibular tests to choose in symptomatic patients after a cochlear implant? A systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 274(1):53-63

    16 studies / 957 patients; subjective symptoms uncorrelated with objective tests; caloric least sensitive, cVEMP most often impaired, video head-impulse test usually preserved.

  • 2017
    Zeng FGChallenges in Improving Cochlear Implant Performance and AccessibilityIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; 64(8):1662-1664

    Identifies the two gaps limiting CI: the stimulating interface (few large electrodes -> broad activation, poor frequency resolution) and accessibility/cost (penetration ~20% in developed, <1% in developing countries). Frontier-problem framing.

  • 2017
    Mitchell-Innes A, Morse R, Irving R, Begg PImplantable microphones as an alternative to external microphones for cochlear implantsCochlear Implants International; 18(6):304-313

    Review of implantable microphone approaches; body/contact noise the key obstacle, ossicular-motion sensing proposed as a route around it.

  • 2017
    Goehring T, Bolner F, Monaghan JJM, van Dijk B, Zarowski A, Bleeck SSpeech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant usersHearing Research; 344:183-194

    Neural-network speech enhancement applied to CI signal path; significant intelligibility gains in babble in CI subjects, outperforming Wiener filtering.

  • 2017
    Cristofari E, Cuda D, Martini A, Forli F, Zanetti D, et al.A Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Data Logging in Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Automated Scene Classification TechnologiesAudiology & Neurotology; 22(4-5):226-235
    doi:10.1159/000484078PMID 29232662cristofari2017-datalogging

    1366 Nucleus 6 recipients; SCAN classifier categorizes input into six scenes (quiet, speech in quiet, speech in noise, noise, music, wind); data logging characterizes real-world listening for counseling/management.

  • 2017
    Sennaroğlu L, Bajin MDClassification and Current Management of Inner Ear MalformationsBalkan Medical Journal; 34(5):397–411

    The updated and most widely used inner-ear-malformation classification — refines incomplete partition I/II/III, adds rudimentary otocyst and cochlear-aperture/bony-cochlear-nerve-canal criteria, and ties each category to CI/ABI decision making, electrode choice and gusher risk.

  • 2017
    Dritsakis G, van Besouw RM, O'Meara AImpact of music on the quality of life of cochlear implant users: a focus group studyCochlear Implants International; 18(4):207-215

    Focus-group study, 30 adult CI users: music contributes to QoL via positive emotion, relaxation, reminiscence and reduced isolation.

  • 2017
    Kuthubutheen J, Coates H, Rowsell C, et al.The role of preoperative steroids for hearing preservation cochlear implantation: results of a randomized controlled trialAudiology and Neurotology; 22(4-5):284-290

    RCT of preoperative systemic steroids; modest short-term hearing-preservation benefit.

  • 2017
    Perez Fornos A, Cavuscens S, Ranieri M, van de Berg R, Stokroos R, Kingma H, Guyot JP, Guinand NThe vestibular implant: a probe in orbit around the human balance systemJournal of Vestibular Research; 27(1):51-61

    Review of stimulation strategies, baseline rate, current spread and misalignment of the evoked eVOR.

  • 2017
    van de Berg R, Lucieer F, Guinand N, van Tongeren J, George E, Guyot JP, Kingma H, van Hoof M, Temel Y, van Overbeeke J, Pérez-Fornos A, Stokroos RThe Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion-A Case ReportFrontiers in Neurology; 8:137

    Demonstrated that semicircular-canal electrode insertion need not acutely abolish cochlear function (ABR-monitored); proof-of-concept for hearing preservation.

  • 2017
    Bruchhage KL, Leichtle A, Schonweiler R, Todt I, Baumgartner WD, et alSystematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economical outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge for the treatment of sensorineural hearing lossEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Active middle-ear implant outcomes and limits of the evidence.

  • 2017
    Zhou N, Dong LEvaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for DetectionTrends in Hearing

    Links the rate/integration effect on threshold to neural health and detection slopes.

  • 2017
    Anwar A, Singleton A, Fang Y, Wang B, Shapiro W, Roland JT, Waltzman SBThe value of intraoperative EABRs in auditory brainstem implantationInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

    Links number of intraoperative eABR peaks to postoperative auditory percepts.

  • 2017
    Hall WCWhat you don't know can hurt you: the risk of language deprivation by impairing sign language development in deaf childrenMaternal and Child Health Journal

    Argues observed harms attributed to sign may instead reflect underlying language deprivation.

  • 2017
    Geers AE, Mitchell CM, Warner-Czyz A, Wang NY, Eisenberg LS, CDaCI Investigative TeamEarly sign language exposure and cochlear implantation benefitsPediatrics

    Multisite cohort reporting better auditory and speech outcomes with little or no sustained sign exposure; the key contested finding.

  • 2017
    Wilson BS, Tucci DL, Merson MH, O'Donoghue GMGlobal hearing health care: new findings and perspectivesThe Lancet

    Lays out the global unmet need and the case for expanding access including implants.

  • 2017
    Dorman MF, Gifford RHSpeech understanding in complex listening environments by listeners fit with cochlear implantsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

    Characterises performance in realistic rooms where distance and reflections combine.

  • 2017
    Dorman MF, Natale S, Spahr A, Castioni ESpeech Understanding in Noise by Patients With Cochlear Implants Using a Monaural Adaptive BeamformerJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

    Documents large speech-in-noise gains from a single-side adaptive beamformer.

  • 2017
    Razza S, Zaccone M, Meli A, Cristofari EEvaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Nucleus system 6 implant recipients using two different digital remote microphone technologies and a speech enhancement algorithmInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

    Paediatric SRT-in-noise gains from digital remote microphone technologies.

  • 2017
    Vroegop JL, Dingemanse JG, Homans NC, Goedegebure AEvaluation of a wireless remote microphone in bimodal cochlear implant recipientsInternational Journal of Audiology

    Shows added benefit when streaming/remote mic reaches both ears in bimodal users.

  • 2017
    McRackan TR, Velozo CA, Holcomb MA, Camposeo EL, Hatch JL, Meyer TA, Lambert PR, Melvin CL, Dubno JRUse of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life InstrumentJAMA Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

    Patient-voiced functional domains that should anchor expectation-setting and counselling.

  • 2016
    Campbell L, Kaicer A, Sly D, et al.Intraoperative real-time cochlear response telemetry predicts hearing preservation in cochlear implantationOtology & Neurotology; 37(4):332–338

    Intraoperative cochlear response telemetry predicting hearing preservation.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2016
    Weiss RS, Voss A, Hemmert WOptogenetic stimulation of the cochlea — a review of mechanisms, measurements, and first modelsNetwork: Computation in Neural Systems; 27(2-3):212–236

    Mechanisms and measurement review for optogenetic cochlear stimulation.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2016
    Holden LK, Firszt JB, Reeder RM, et al.Factors affecting outcomes in cochlear implant recipients implanted with a perimodiolar electrode array located in scala tympaniOtology & Neurotology; 37(10):1662–1668

    In clean scala-tympani placement, age at implantation was the main outcome predictor.

    Cited in: Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2016
    Birman CS, Powell HR, Gibson WP, et al.Cochlear implant outcomes in cochlea nerve aplasia and hypoplasiaOtology & Neurotology; 37(5):438–445

    Spoken-language outcomes much better in nerve hypoplasia than aplasia.

    Cited in: Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2016
    Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, et alHearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)Ear and Hearing; 37 Suppl 1:5S–27S

    The FUEL framework — listening effort and fatigue as outcome dimensions beyond recognition scores.

    Cited in: Speech-in-noise & valid testing, Self-report & functional outcomes

  • 2016
    Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Blineder M, et alEffects of Stimulation Rate With the FS4 and HDCIS Coding Strategies in Cochlear Implant RecipientsOtology & Neurotology; 37(7):882-888

    FS4 vs HDCIS stimulation-rate effects.

    Cited in: Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling

  • 2016
    Dillon MT, Buss E, King ER, Deres EJ, Obarowski SN, Anderson ML, Adunka MCComparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perceptionCochlear Implants International, 17(5), 263-270; 17(5):263-270

    Independent US cohort (n=22); HDCIS vs FSP no significant difference on CNC, HINT, AzBio, BKB-SIN.

  • 2016
    Frodlund J, Harder H, Mäki-Torkko E, Ledin TVestibular Function After Cochlear Implantation: A Comparison of Three Types of ElectrodesOtol Neurotol 2016;37(10):1535-1540; 37(10):1535-1540

    Stiff electrode -> more caloric reduction/dizziness.

    Cited in: Choosing the Ear: Vestibular Risk and Bilateral Implants, Atraumatic Surgery: Preserving Hearing and Balance Together

  • 2016
    le Nobel GJ, Hwang E, Wu A, Cushing S, Lin VYVestibular function following unilateral cochlear implantation for profound sensorineural hearing lossJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;45(1):38; 45(1):38

    Unilateral-CI vestibular outcomes; ear-selection context.

    Cited in: Choosing the Ear: Vestibular Risk and Bilateral Implants

  • 2016
    Qin F, Li W, Qiu J, Zhang L, Zhong MAfter cochlear implantation: Complications related to flap around implantsJournal of Otology, 11(4):198-201

    Candidate DOI 10.1155/2019/9395141 invalid (Crossref 404) and source (Neural Plasticity 2019) wrong. Real paper with this exact title: Qin F, Li W et al., Journal of Otology 2016;11(4):198-201 (PMID 29937830, DOI verified). Corrected authors, year, source, DOI.

  • 2016
    Brackmann DE, Shelton C, Arriaga MA (eds)Otologic SurgeryElsevier; 4th edition
    brackmann2016

    Standard otologic-surgery reference for temporal-bone anatomy and technique.

  • 2016
    Tarabichi M, Nazhat O, Kassouma J, Najmi MEndoscopic cochlear implantation: Call for cautionThe Laryngoscope; 126(3):689–692

    Cautionary appraisal of totally transcanal endoscopic insertion.

  • 2016
    Dettman SJ, Dowell RC, Choo D, et al.Long-term communication outcomes for children receiving cochlear implants younger than 12 months: a multicenter studyOtology & Neurotology; 37(2):e82-e95

    ~81% of children implanted before 12 months reached normal vocabulary development.

  • 2016
    Hunter JB, Carlson ML, Sweeney AD, et al.Cochlear implantation in the setting of perioperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapyOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; 2016; n=46 adults
    PMID 26671902hunter2016

    Continuing anticoagulation through CI surgery is reasonable in selected patients.

  • 2016
    Smulders YE, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Rinia AB, van Zanten GA, Stokroos RJ, Free RH, Maat B, Frijns JHM, Mylanus EAM, Huinck WJ, Topsakal V, Tange RA, Grolman WComparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical TrialJAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery; 142(3):249-256

    Multicenter RCT; bilateral simultaneous CI improved localization and speech-in-noise vs unilateral.

  • 2016
    Veugen LCE, Chalupper J, Snik AFM, van Opstal AJ, Mens LHMFrequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant usersActa Oto-Laryngologica; 136(8):775-781

    Frequency-dependent loudness balancing and AGC alignment between CI and hearing aid improve bimodal balance.

  • 2016
    Moberly AC, Bates C, Harris MS, Pisoni DBThe enigma of poor performance by adults with cochlear implantsOtology & Neurotology; 37(10):1522-1528

    Reviews unexplained variability in adult CI outcomes; cognitive/linguistic as well as auditory contributors to poor performance.

  • 2016
    Kennedy TA, Connell N, Szczykutowicz T, Schafer S, Royalty K, Nace S, Gartrell B, Gubbels SFlat-panel CT for cochlear implant electrode imaging: comparison to multi-detector CTOtology & Neurotology; 37(10):1646-1653

    Flat-panel/cone-beam CT resolves scalar position with less metal artifact and lower dose than MDCT.

  • 2016
    Bas E, Bohorquez J, Goncalves S, Perez E, Dinh CT, Garnham C, et al.Electrode array-eluted dexamethasone protects against electrode insertion trauma induced hearing and hair cell losses, damage to neural elements, increases in impedance and fibrosis: a dose response studyHearing Research; 337:12-24

    Dose-response (1% and 10% w/w micronized dexamethasone in silicone array). Steroid-eluting arrays reduced hearing-threshold shift, hair-cell and neural-element loss, impedance rise and fibrosis/osteoneogenesis after traumatic implantation. Preclinical foundation for module 4.

  • 2016
    Wilk M, Hessler R, Mugridge K, Jolly C, Fadler M, Lenarz T, Scheper VImpedance changes and fibrous tissue growth after cochlear implantation are correlated and can be reduced using a dexamethasone eluting electrodePLoS ONE; 11(2):e0147552

    Hannover group. Guinea-pig study directly linking peri-electrode fibrous-tissue growth to impedance rise, and showing both 1% and 10% dexamethasone-eluting arrays reduced fibrosis and impedance. Key mechanistic link for module 4.

  • 2016
    Bierer JA, Litvak LReducing channel interaction through cochlear implant programming may improve speech perceptionTrends in Hearing; 20:2331216516653389
    doi:10.1177/2331216516653389PMID 27317668bierer2016-channel-interaction-programming

    Deactivating or focusing channels with poor interface (high focused thresholds) improved speech perception, supporting fewer-but-cleaner channels over raw channel count (module 6).

  • 2016
    Creighton FX, Guan X, Park S, Kymissis I, Nakajima HH, Olson ESAn Intracochlear Pressure Sensor as a Microphone for a Fully Implantable Cochlear ImplantOtology & Neurotology; 37(10):1596-1600

    Demonstrates an intracochlear pressure sensor in human cadaveric temporal bones reproducing a usable input signal for a fully implantable CI; an alternative sensing site to subcutaneous mics and ossicular accelerometers.

  • 2016
    Vesseur AC, Verbist BM, Westerlaan HE, Kloostra FJJ, Admiraal RJC, van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA, Free RH, Mylanus EAMCT findings of the temporal bone in CHARGE syndrome: aspects of importance in cochlear implant surgeryEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 273(12):4225-4240

    CT review of 42 temporal bones in CHARGE syndrome documenting absent semicircular canals (77%), stenotic oval window (71%), and aberrant facial-nerve course (9-18%) crossing the round window or promontory; underpins the mandate for facial-nerve monitoring in malformed/CHARGE ears.

  • 2016
    Wilk M, Hessler R, Mugridge K, et al.Impedance changes and fibrous tissue growth after cochlear implantation are correlated and can be reduced using a dexamethasone eluting electrodePLoS ONE; 11(2):e0147552

    Dexamethasone-eluting array reduces fibrosis/impedance; cross-reference Emerging Tech drug-eluting arrays.

  • 2016
    Roland JT Jr, Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, Parkinson AJUnited States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear Nucleus Hybrid implant systemThe Laryngoscope; 126(1):175-181

    Pivotal US Nucleus Hybrid L24 EAS trial; basis for 2014 FDA approval.

  • 2016
    Mertens G, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning PCochlear implantation as a long-term treatment for ipsilateral incapacitating tinnitus in subjects with unilateral hearing loss up to 10 yearsHearing Research; 331:1-6

    Long-term (up to 10 yr) follow-up of CI for incapacitating ipsilateral tinnitus in unilateral hearing loss; durable tinnitus suppression. Verified PubMed.

  • 2016
    Guinand N, van de Berg R, Cavuscens S, Stokroos R, Ranieri M, Pelizzone M, Kingma H, Guyot JP, Perez Fornos ARestoring visual acuity in dynamic conditions with a vestibular implantFrontiers in Neuroscience; 10:577

    Vestibular implant restores dynamic visual acuity (counters oscillopsia) in bilateral vestibular loss patients; Geneva-Maastricht group.

  • 2016
    Dimitriadis PA, Farr MR, Allam A, Ray JThree year experience with the cochlear BAHA Attract implant: a systematic reviewBMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders

    Real-world Baha Attract outcomes including magnet-related skin and MRI issues.

  • 2016
    Bruschini L, Berrettini S, Forli F, Murri A, et al.The Carina middle ear implant: surgical and functional outcomesEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Longer surgical and functional experience highlighting microphone and reliability issues.

  • 2016
    Macherey O, Cazals YEffects of Pulse Shape and Polarity on Sensitivity to Cochlear Implant StimulationAdvances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

    Demonstrates how pulse parameters trade against current at the neuron.

  • 2016
    Lee JM, Chang JW, Choi JY, Chang WS, Moon ISHearing Restoration in Neurofibromatosis Type II PatientsYonsei Medical Journal

    NF2 as the prototypical setting where the cochlear nerve is lost.

  • 2016
    Humphries T, Kushalnagar P, Mathur G, Napoli DJ, Padden C, Rathmann C, Smith SAvoiding linguistic neglect of deaf childrenSocial Service Review
    doi:10.1086/689543humphries2016neglect

    Articulates an ethical floor of guaranteed early language and the harm of failing to provide it.

  • 2016
    Sorkin DL, Buchman CACochlear Implant Access in Six Developed CountriesOtology and Neurotology

    Cross-country comparison of access policy and uptake even among wealthy nations.

  • 2016
    Dyballa KH, Hehrmann P, Hamacher V, Lenarz T, Buechner ATransient Noise Reduction in Cochlear Implant Users: a Multi-Band ApproachAudiology Research

    Details per-band detection and attenuation of short, intense transient sounds.

  • 2016
    De Ceulaer G, Bestel J, Mulder HE, Goldbeck F, de Varebeke SP, Govaerts PJSpeech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker networkEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Multi-talker network of three transmitters improved SRT by ~15 dB over no remote mic.

  • 2015
    Hang AX, Roush PA, Teagle HFB, et al.Is “no response” on diagnostic auditory brainstem response testing an indication for cochlear implantation in children?Ear and Hearing; 36(1):8–13

    ABR/eABR in CI candidacy for children with auditory neuropathy / nerve deficiency.

    Cited in: Electrically-evoked ABR

  • 2015
    Campbell L, Kaicer A, Briggs R, O'Leary SCochlear response telemetry: intracochlear electrocochleography via cochlear implant neural response telemetry pilot study resultsOtology & Neurotology; 36(3):399–405

    Recording ECochG through the implant for intraoperative insertion monitoring.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2015
    Dalbert A, Sim JH, Gerig R, et al.Correlation of electrophysiological properties and hearing preservation in cochlear implant patientsOtology & Neurotology; 36(7):1172–1180

    Intracochlear ECochG and hearing-preservation outcomes.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2015
    Wouters J, McDermott HJ, Francart TSound coding in cochlear implants: from electric pulses to hearingIEEE Signal Processing Magazine; 32(2):67–80

    Modern review of cochlear-implant sound-coding strategies — CIS, n-of-m (ACE/SPEAK), fine-structure coding, and front-end pre-processing.

    Cited in: The processor's signal path, Peak-picking — SPEAK & ACE, Fine structure & temporal coding

  • 2015
    Dorman MF, Parkin JLThe role of the Utah Artificial Ear project in the development of the modern cochlear implantCochlear Implants International; 16(Suppl 3):S3–S9

    History of the University of Utah six-electrode percutaneous Ineraid/Symbion device — no internal electronics, direct electrode access that made it the great research workhorse of the field.

    Cited in: The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes

  • 2015
    Zeng FG, Rebscher SJ, Fu QJ, et alDevelopment and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant systemHearing Research; 322:188-199

    Nurotron 26-electrode CI system (APS/Symphony).

    Cited in: The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2015
    Wolter NE, Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Cushing SLVestibular and Balance Impairment Contributes to Cochlear Implant Failure in ChildrenOtol Neurotol 2015;36(6):1029-1034; 36(6):1029-1034

    Children with reduced vestibular function 7.6x more likely to have device failure.

    Cited in: The Child's Balance and Motor Development

  • 2015
    De Kegel A, Maes L, Van Waelvelde H, Dhooge IExamining the impact of cochlear implantation on the early gross motor development of children with a hearing lossEar Hear 2015;36(3):e113-e121; 36(3):e113-e121

    Gross-motor dip 6-18 months, recovery by 24 months.

    Cited in: The Child's Balance and Motor Development

  • 2015
    Xu XD, Zhang XT, Zhang Q, Hu J, Chen YF, Xu MOcular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in children with cochlear implantClin Neurophysiol 2015;126(8):1624-1631; 126(8):1624-1631

    cVEMP response rate 67.7% pre-op -> 32.0% post-op, with amplitude decrease.

    Cited in: The Child's Balance and Motor Development

  • 2015
    Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT Jr, Svirsky MThe relationship between insertion angles, default frequency allocations, and spiral ganglion place pitch in cochlear implantsEar and Hearing; 36(5):e207–e213

    Quantifies the systematic place-pitch mismatch of default frequency tables.

  • 2015
    Ferguson MA, Henshaw HAuditory training can improve working memory, attention, and communication in adverse conditions for adults with hearing lossFrontiers in Psychology; 6:556

    Cognitive/communication benefits of auditory training beyond phoneme scores.

  • 2015
    Mosnier I, Bebear JP, Marx M, et al.Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patientsJAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery; 141(5):442-450
    PMID 25763680mosnier2015

    Cognitive screening scores improved after CI in elderly recipients.

  • 2015
    Eftekharian A, Mahani MHJervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome in cochlear implanted patients: our experience and a review of literatureInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology; 79(9):1544-1547

    Safe CI in JLNS with cardiac precautions.

  • 2015
    Zhang J, Tyler R, Ji H, Dunn C, Wang N, Hansen M, Gantz BSpeech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear ImplantsAmerican Journal of Audiology; 24(3):384-397

    Longitudinal simultaneous bilateral CI adults; SSQ/SHQ improve to ~1 year, largest gains in spatial domain and first 6 months.

  • 2015
    Kan A, Litovsky RYBinaural hearing with electrical stimulationHearing Research; 322:127-37

    Review of how bilateral CI users access (and fail to access) binaural cues; ITD sensitivity degrades as stimulation rate rises into the hundreds of pps, while ILD-based localization survives. Anchors module 13.

  • 2015
    Carlson ML, Neff BA, Link MJ, Lane JI, Watson RE, McGee KP, Bernstein MA, Driscoll CLMagnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging QualityOtology & Neurotology; 36(6):965-971

    1.5T MRI feasible in most patients without magnet removal under controlled conditions; pain and artifact described.

  • 2015
    Hsieh HS, Wu CM, Zhuo MY, Yang CH, Hwang CFIntraoperative facial nerve monitoring during cochlear implant surgery: an observational studyMedicine (Baltimore); 94(4):e456

    Retrospective series of 645 cochlear implant recipients evaluating whether intraoperative facial-nerve EMG monitoring lowers postoperative facial weakness; facial-weakness incidence 0.73% with monitoring vs 0.54% without, all permanent-risk events clustered on right-sided cases by right-handed surgeons.

  • 2015
    Minami SB, Takegoshi H, Shinjo Y, Enomoto C, Kaga KUsefulness of measuring electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with inner ear malformations during cochlear implantationActa Oto-Laryngologica; 135(10):1007-1015

    Intraoperative eABR (and ECAP) objectively confirm auditory pathway function in malformed cochleae and cochlear nerve deficiency.

  • 2015
    Wanna GB, Noble JH, Gifford RH, Dietrich MS, Sweeney AD, Zhang D, Dawant BM, Rivas A, Labadie RFImpact of intrascalar electrode location, electrode type, and angular insertion depth on residual hearing in cochlear implant patients: preliminary resultsOtology & Neurotology; 36(8):1343-1348

    Scala-tympani placement and shallower angular insertion associated with better residual hearing; scalar location verified on postoperative CT.

  • 2015
    Ramakers GGJ, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Grolman WThe effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with bilateral hearing loss: A systematic reviewLaryngoscope; 125(11):2584-2592

    Systematic review; tinnitus improved in most CI recipients but evidence is low-level; complete suppression and occasional worsening both reported.

  • 2015
    Batuecas-Caletrio A, Klumpp M, Santacruz-Ruiz S, Benito Orejas JI, Gonzalez Sanchez E, Guardado Sanchez JVestibular function in cochlear implantation: correlating objectiveness and subjectivenessLaryngoscope 2015;125(10):2371-2375; 125(10):2371-2375

    Prospective pre/post vHIT and VEMP; ~30% show a post-operative change in canal/otolith function; objective change correlates poorly with reported dizziness. Used for the around-surgery test battery.

  • 2015
    Phillips C, Ling L, Oxford T, Nowack A, Nie K, Rubinstein JT, Phillips JOLongitudinal performance of an implantable vestibular prosthesisHearing Research; 322:200-211

    Longitudinal human data on baseline-rate stimulation and rate modulation driving eye movements; University of Washington.

  • 2015
    Guinand N, van de Berg R, Cavuscens S, Stokroos RJ, Ranieri M, Pelizzone M, Kingma H, Guyot JP, Pérez-Fornos AVestibular Implants: 8 Years of Experience with Electrical Stimulation of the Vestibular Nerve in 11 Patients with Bilateral Vestibular LossORL; Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties; 77(4):227-240

    Geneva-Maastricht series; smooth controllable eye movements obtained in all patients; foundational chronic human VOR data.

  • 2015
    Guinand N, Pérez-Fornos A, Stokroos R, Kingma H, Guyot JPVestibular implants: hope for improving the quality of life of patients with bilateral vestibular lossAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2015:7192-7195

    QoL rationale for vestibular implantation; bilateral vestibular loss has no effective treatment and severely impairs quality of life.

  • 2015
    Reinfeldt S, Hakansson B, Taghavi H, Eeg-Olofsson MNew developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a reviewMedical Devices (Auckland)

    Comprehensive review of bone-conduction device principles and indication ranges.

  • 2015
    Peters JP, van Zon A, Smit AL, van Zanten GA, et alCINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluationBMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders

    Design of the landmark RCT comparing CI, BCD and CROS for SSD.

  • 2015
    Pfingst BE, Zhou N, Colesa DJ, Watts MM, et al.Importance of cochlear health for implant functionHearing Research

    Links neural survival to psychophysical functions that shape loudness growth and levels.

  • 2015
    Zhou N, Kraft CT, Colesa DJ, Pfingst BEIntegration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear ImplantsJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

    Quantifies multipulse temporal integration of threshold across rate.

  • 2015
    Puram SV, Herrmann B, Barker FG, Lee DJRetrosigmoid Craniotomy for Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Adult Patients with Neurofibromatosis 2Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B

    Surgical exposure of the lateral recess and the neighbouring structures at risk.

  • 2015
    Noij KS, Kozin ED, Sethi R, Shah PV, Kaplan AB, Herrmann B, et alSystematic review of nontumor pediatric auditory brainstem implant outcomesOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    Pooled paediatric non-tumour outcomes across the literature.

  • 2015
    Lim HH, Lenarz TAuditory midbrain implant: research and development towards a second clinical trialHearing Research

    Lessons learned and the path to an improved next-generation midbrain array.

  • 2015
    Mitchiner JCDeaf parents of cochlear-implanted children: beliefs on bimodal bilingualismJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Shows even Deaf parents endorse combining an implant with sign language, illustrating convergence.

  • 2015
    Bronkhorst AWThe cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speechAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics

    Authoritative review of the cocktail-party problem and the cues needed to solve it.

  • 2015
    Kolberg ER, Sheffield SW, Davis TJ, Sunderhaus LW, Gifford RHCochlear implant microphone location affects speech recognition in diffuse noiseJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Direct evidence that a canal-entrance microphone outperforms the behind-the-ear position for frontal speech in noise.

  • 2015
    Dingemanse JG, Goedegebure AApplication of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral ResolutionEar and Hearing

    Describes SNR-based single-channel noise reduction and its effect on noise tolerance versus intelligibility.

  • 2015
    Wolfe J, Neumann S, Marsh M, Schafer E, Lianos L, Gilden J, et al.Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound ProcessorOtology & Neurotology

    Multicentre evidence that automatic scene-driven processing improves speech in noise without harming quiet performance.

  • 2015
    Gilden J, Lewis K, Grant G, Crosson JImproved hearing in noise using new signal processing algorithms with the Cochlear Nucleus 6 sound processorJournal of Otology

    Demonstrates real-world noise benefit from integrated automatic algorithms.

  • 2015
    Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer EImproving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming AccessoryJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Documents benefit of a wireless remote-mic audio-streaming accessory and informs counselling on uptake.

  • 2015
    Alfakir R, Holmes AE, Kricos PB, Gaeta L, Martin SEvaluation of Speech Perception via the Use of Hearing Loops and TelecoilsGerontology & Geriatric Medicine

    Objective and subjective evidence that loops and telecoils improve speech perception and sound quality.

  • 2015
    Riehle TH, Knuesel RJ, Lichter PA, Panescu DTri-axial telecoil hearing aid for improved connection to public induction loopsConf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC)

    Documents the telecoil orientation problem and a multi-axis solution for public loops.

  • 2015
    O'Sullivan JA, Power AJ, Mesgarani N, Rajaram S, Foxe JJ, Shinn-Cunningham BG, Slaney M, Shamma SA, Lalor ECAttentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEGCerebral Cortex

    Foundational demonstration that attended speech can be decoded from EEG, basis for cognitively controlled hearing.

  • 2014
    Wolfe J, Schafer ECProgramming Cochlear ImplantsPlural Publishing, San Diego, CA; 2nd edition (Core Clinical Concepts in Audiology)

    Reference text linking objective measures to the programming workflow.

    Cited in: Impedance & electrode interface, Intraoperative ECochG, Objective measures → the MAP, Troubleshooting & special cases, Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2014
    Fitzpatrick DC, Campbell AP, Choudhury B, et al.Round window electrocochleography just before cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adultsOtology & Neurotology; 35(1):64–71

    Round-window ECochG before implantation and word-recognition outcomes.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2014
    Vaerenberg B, Smits C, De Ceulaer G, et al.Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the artThe Scientific World Journal; 2014:501738

    Global survey of CI programming practice — context for the troubleshooting workflow.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2014
    Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Government of IndiaAssistance to Disabled Persons for Purchase/Fitting of Aids and Appliances (ADIP) — cochlear implant componentGovernment of India, New Delhi; Ceiling of ₹6 lakh per implant; children up to 5 years of age

    State-funded cochlear implantation for children from low-income families — the principal route to an implant for most Indian families.

    Cited in: Prevention & the cochlear-implant access gap

  • 2014
    Fallon JB, Ryugo DK, Shepherd RKConsequences of deafness and electrical stimulation on the peripheral and central auditory systemIn: Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr, eds. Cochlear Implants, 3rd ed. New York: Thieme; pp. 19–37
    ISBN 9781604069037fallonryugo2014

    Reviews spiral-ganglion and cochlear-nucleus pathology after deafness (human SGN survival, the critical-period ablation distinction) and the restoration of endbulb-of-Held synapses by electrical stimulation in young deaf animals.

    Cited in: The deaf brain — auditory deprivation, The implant as environmental input, Binaural plasticity & bilateral CIs

  • 2014
    Froemke RC, Heman-Ackah SE, Waltzman SBAuditory neuroplasticityIn: Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr, eds. Cochlear Implants, 3rd ed. New York: Thieme; pp. 38–46

    Reviews neuroplasticity relevant to cochlear-implant design and outcomes, including lifelong cortical plasticity and progressive post-implant improvement with use and training.

    Cited in: Adult plasticity & rehabilitation

  • 2014
    Eppsteiner RW, Gurgel RK, Smith RJGenetics of hearing loss and predictors of cochlear implant outcomeIn: Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr, eds. Cochlear Implants, 3rd ed. New York: Thieme; pp. 10–18
    ISBN 9781604069037eppsteiner2014

    Source chapter synthesising the genetic basis of deafness, comprehensive genetic testing, and the impact of genotype on cochlear-implant performance.

    Cited in: Overview — genes, deafness & the implant, The deafness-gene landscape, Genetic testing in the CI work-up, Genotype-specific CI outcomes, Counselling, recurrence & ethics

  • 2014
    Goderis J, De Leenheer E, Smets K, et alHearing loss and congenital CMV infection: a systematic reviewPediatrics; 134(5):972–982

    Systematic review establishing congenital cytomegalovirus as a leading non-genetic cause of childhood SNHL, often progressive and delayed-onset.

    Cited in: Congenital CMV & in-utero infections

  • 2014
  • 2014
    Riss D, et alFS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategiesEar and Hearing; 35(6):e272–e281

    Crossover comparison of MED-EL fine-structure coding strategies.

    Cited in: SYNCHRONY, FSP and the SONNET/RONDO System, Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling, The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2014
    Kleine Punte A, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning PLong-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implantsORL; Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties, 76(1), 36-43; 76(1):36-43

    FSP speech-in-noise SRT 16.2->3.0 dB over 24 months (13.2 dB gain); HDCIS control unchanged (n=32).

    Cited in: Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling

  • 2014
    Venter PJ, Hanekom JJIs there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (JARO), 15(5), 849-866; 15(5):849-866

    Single-electrode rate DLs rise steeply above 300 pps; 18-electrode spread mode holds 6-8% to 600 pps.

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2014
    Golub JS, Ling L, Nie K, Nowack A, Shepherd SJ, Bierer SM, Jameyson E, Kaneko CR, Phillips JO, Rubinstein JTProsthetic implantation of the human vestibular systemOtol Neurotol 2014;35(1):136-147; 35(1):136-147

    First human prosthetic vestibular implantation; human EVOR data; current-spread side effects.

  • 2014
    Samuel PA, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Bittencourt AG, et al.Remote programming of cochlear implantsCoDAS; 2014;26(6)

    Feasibility/validity of remote (tele-audiology) cochlear-implant programming.

  • 2014
    Constantinescu G, Waite M, Dornan D, et al.A pilot study of telepractice delivery for teaching listening and spoken language to children with hearing lossJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare; 20(3):135-140

    Telepractice AVT comparable to in-person on language outcomes.

  • 2014
    Mick P, Amoodi H, Shipp D, et al.Cochlear implantation in patients with advanced Meniere's diseaseOtology & Neurotology; 35(7):1172-1178

    CI rehabilitates end-stage Meniere hearing loss; variable vertigo effect.

  • 2014
    Cloutier F, Bussieres R, Ferron P, Cote MOCTO: outcomes of cochlear implant for the octogenarians, audiologic and quality-of-lifeOtology & Neurotology; 35(1):22-28
    PMID 24270725cloutier2014

    Octogenarian CI outcomes and quality-of-life gains.

  • 2014
    Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of IndiaAssistance to Disabled Persons (ADIP) Scheme: cochlear implant programmeGovernment of India; ~Rs 6 lakh per unit; below-poverty-line children; AYJNISHD nodal agency
    adip2014

    Government-funded full-pathway CI programme as a low-resource access model.

  • 2014
    Labadie RF, Balachandran R, Noble JH, Blachon GS, Mitchell JE, Reda FA, Dawant BM, Fitzpatrick JMMinimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation surgery: first report of clinical implementationLaryngoscope; 124(8):1915-1922

    Vanderbilt percutaneous/MICI first clinical report: CT-planned linear trajectory through the facial recess to scala tympani via a patient-specific microstereotactic frame, drilled in a single pass.

  • 2014
    Géléoc GS, Holt JRSound strategies for hearing restorationScience; 344(6184):1241062

    Review framing gene therapy, hair-cell regeneration, and the cochlea as a target for biological restoration.

  • 2014
    Pinyon JL, Tadros SF, Froud KE, Wong AC, Tompson IT, Crawford EN, Ko M, Morris R, Klugmann M, Housley GDClose-field electroporation gene delivery using the cochlear implant electrode array enhances the bionic earScience Translational Medicine; 6(233):233ra54

    Used the implant array itself to deliver BDNF gene; regrew auditory neurites toward the electrodes in guinea pigs.

  • 2014
    Limb CJ, Roy ATTechnological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant usersHearing Research; 308:13-26

    Spine review for why music is the implant's hardest signal; pitch and timbre fail while rhythm is largely preserved.

  • 2014
    Reiss LA, Ito RA, Eggleston JL, Wozny DRPitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experienceEar and Hearing; 36(2):e23-e34

    Documents shifts in electric pitch percepts over time in bimodal users, with incomplete adaptation in some recipients.

  • 2014
    Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Blineder M, Honeder C, Ehrenreich I, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner CFS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategiesEar and Hearing; 35(6):e272-e281

    Crossover study of fine-structure coding strategies extending temporal fine-structure coverage on apical channels.

  • 2014
    Santa Maria PL, Gluth MB, Yuan Y, Atlas MD, Blevins NHHearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation: a meta-analysisOtology & Neurotology; 35(10):e256-e269

    Meta-analysis of surgical, electrode-design and steroid factors predicting low-frequency preservation.

  • 2014
    Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH, Rosenfeld RM, Chandrasekhar SS, Cunningham ER Jr, et alClinical practice guideline: tinnitusOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;151(2 Suppl):S1-S40; 151(2 Suppl):S1-S40

    AAO-HNSF guideline: recommends CBT for persistent bothersome tinnitus, recommends against routine medication/supplements; sound therapy and education as options. Frames the established-care backbone.

  • 2014
    Golub JS, Ling L, Nie K, Nowack A, Shepherd SJ, Bierer SM, Jameyson E, Kaneko CRS, Phillips JO, Rubinstein JTProsthetic implantation of the human vestibular systemOtology & Neurotology; 35(1):136-147

    First demonstration of an artificial vestibulo-ocular reflex from a vestibular implant in humans (University of Washington group).

  • 2014
    Eeg-Olofsson M, Hakansson B, Reinfeldt S, Taghavi H, et al.The bone conduction implant--first implantation, surgical and audiologic aspectsOtology & Neurotology

    Early surgical and audiologic experience with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.

  • 2014
    Skarzynski H, Olszewski L, Skarzynski PH, Lorens A, et al.Direct round window stimulation with the Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge: 5 years of experience using a technique without interposed fasciaEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

    Surgical technique and stability of direct round-window FMT placement.

  • 2014
    Mertens G, Desmet J, Snik AF, Van de Heyning PAn experimental objective method to determine maximum output and dynamic range of an active bone conduction implant: the BonebridgeOtology & Neurotology

    Output/dynamic-range method underlying active device fitting ranges.

  • 2014
    Pulcherio JO, Bittencourt AG, Burke PR, et alCarina and Esteem: a systematic review of fully implantable hearing devicesPLoS One

    Systematic review of the two principal totally implantable middle-ear devices.

  • 2014
    Merkus P, Di Lella F, Di Trapani G, Pasanisi E, Beltrame MA, Zanetti D, Falcioni M, Sanna MIndications and contraindications of auditory brainstem implants: systematic review and illustrative casesEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

    Systematic synthesis of who is and is not an ABI candidate across tumour and non-tumour groups.

  • 2014
    Behr R, Colletti V, Matthies C, Morita A, Nakatomi H, Dominique L, et alNew outcomes with auditory brainstem implants in NF2 patientsOtol Neurotol

    Multicentre NF2 outcome data quantifying that a minority reach useful sentence recognition.

  • 2014
    Colletti L, Shannon RV, Colletti VThe development of auditory perception in children after auditory brainstem implantationAudiol Neurootol
    doi:10.1159/000363684PMID 25377987collettiL2014development

    Longitudinal development of perception in implanted children.

  • 2014
    Davidson K, Lillo-Martin D, Chen Pichler DSpoken English language development among native signing children with cochlear implantsJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Native ASL signers with implants reached age-appropriate spoken-language levels.

  • 2014
    Boardman FKThe expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic diseaseSocial Science and Medicine

    Empirical evidence that the supposed hurtful message is heard inconsistently.

  • 2014
    Buechner A, Dyballa KH, Hehrmann P, Fredelake S, Lenarz TAdvanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditionsPLoS ONE

    Shows monaural and binaural beamformers improve speech reception in spatially distributed noise.

  • 2014
    Poissant SF, Bero EM, Busekroos L, Shao WDetermining cochlear implant users' true noise tolerance: use of speech reception threshold in noise testingOtology and Neurotology

    Shows adaptive SRT-in-noise better defines CI users' real noise tolerance than fixed-SNR tests.

  • 2013
    Hughes MLObjective Measures in Cochlear ImplantsPlural Publishing, San Diego, CA; 1st edition (Core Clinical Concepts in Audiology)

    The standard textbook on CI objective measures; the spine of this atlas.

    Cited in: ASSR, ECochG & cortical responses, Overview & rationale, Impedance & electrode interface, ECAP / Neural Response Telemetry, ECAP threshold & functions, Electrically-evoked ABR, Electrical cortical responses, Objective measures → the MAP, Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2013
    Karsten SA, Turner CW, Brown CJ, et al.Optimizing the combination of acoustic and electric hearing in the implanted earEar and Hearing; 34(2):142–150

    Meet vs overlap acoustic–electric frequency allocation; 'meet' generally preferred.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2013
    Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et al.Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implantsEar and Hearing; 34(3):342–360

    CT scalar location: perimodiolar/full scala-tympani placement predicts better word recognition.

    Cited in: Predicting the outcome, Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2013
    Moore BCJAn Introduction to the Psychology of HearingBrill, Leiden; 6th edition

    Standard psychoacoustics text — loudness, pitch, masking, and auditory perception.

    Cited in: Coding of intensity & loudness, Coding of frequency & pitch

  • 2013
    Mudry A, Mills MThe early history of the cochlear implant: a retrospectiveJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery; 139(5):446–453

    Comprehensive retrospective on the development of the cochlear implant from Volta through the multichannel era — a primary source for this chapter.

    Cited in: Overview — a 200-year idea, Volta & the first electrical hearing, Djourno & Eyriès — the 1957 first, William House & the single-channel implant, Graeme Clark & the Nucleus implant, The European devices — Chouard & MED-EL, From milestone to mainstream, The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes

  • 2013
    The Hearing ReviewWilliam Demant acquires Neurelec, a French manufacturer of cochlear implantsThe Hearing Review (industry news)
    external linkoticonneurelec2013

    Documents the French Neurelec line (Digisonic; first fully digital CI, 1992), its 2013 acquisition by Demant into Oticon Medical, and the lineage later absorbed by Cochlear in 2024.

    Cited in: The implant goes global

  • 2013
    Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et alFactors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implantsEar and Hearing; 34(3):342–360

    Identifies the strongest pre-operative predictors of cochlear-implant speech outcome, including duration of deafness — the basis for outcome counselling.

    Cited in: Predicting the outcome, Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2013
    Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, et alFactors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patientsAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 18(1):36–47

    Large multicentre analysis confirming duration of deafness, age and aetiology as the dominant predictors of adult cochlear-implant speech outcome.

    Cited in: Predicting the outcome

  • 2013
    Lenarz T, et alEuropean multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implantInternational Journal of Audiology; 52(12):838–848

    Multicentre hearing-preservation outcomes with the Hybrid L24 electrode.

    Cited in: Electric-Acoustic Stimulation and Hearing Preservation

  • 2013
    Wu CC, Luo XCurrent Steering with Partial Tripolar Stimulation Mode in Cochlear ImplantsJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 14(2):213-231

    Current steering + partial tripolar focusing.

    Cited in: Virtual Channels: Current Steering and Current Focusing, The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2013
    Galindo J, Lassaletta L, Mora RP, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Gavilán JFine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant usersEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 270(4), 1223-1229; 270(4):1223-1229

    FSP vs HDCIS on telephone (n=25): landline +10.0 pp, with-noise +11.5 pp; 84% preferred FSP.

  • 2013
    Cushing SL, Gordon KA, Rutka JA, James AL, Papsin BCVestibular end-organ dysfunction in children with sensorineural hearing loss and cochlear implants: an expanded cohort and etiologic assessmentOtol Neurotol 2013;34(3):422-428; 34(3):422-428

    N=153 children; SCC dysfunction ~50% (35% bilateral areflexia); etiologic patterns.

    Cited in: Who Already Has Vestibular Loss: Etiology and Baseline, The Child's Balance and Motor Development

  • 2013
    Inoue A, Iwasaki S, Ushio M, Chihara Y, Fujimoto C, Egami N, Yamasoba TEffect of vestibular dysfunction on the development of gross motor function in children with profound hearing lossAudiol Neurootol 2013;18(3):143-151; 18(3):143-151

    Congenital SNHL: SCC dysfunction 41%, otolith 42%.

    Cited in: Who Already Has Vestibular Loss: Etiology and Baseline

  • 2013
    Criter RE, Honaker JAFalls in the audiology clinic: a pilot studyJ Am Acad Audiol 2013;24(10):1001-1005; 24(10):1001-1005

    ~50% of hearing-loss clinic patients fell in prior 12 months vs 25% general population.

    Cited in: Falls and the Older Recipient

  • 2013
    Seyyedi M, Burgess BJ, Eddington DK, Gantz BJ, Nadol JB JrHistopathology of the Clarion cochlear implant electrode positioner in a human subjectAudiology & Neuro-Otology, Vol 18, No. 4, pp 223-227

    PMID confirmed and points at this exact title, but candidate metadata was wrong: real authors are Seyyedi et al. (NOT Dhanasingh & Jolly), year 2013 (NOT 2014), journal Audiology & Neuro-Otology / Karger vol 18(4) (NOT Otology & Neurotology vol 35). Corrected.

  • 2013
    Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, et al.Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adultsJAMA Internal Medicine; 173(4):293-299

    Hearing loss linked to accelerated cognitive decline.

  • 2013
    Noble W, Jensen NS, Naylor G, Bhullar N, Akeroyd MAA short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: The SSQ12International Journal of Audiology; 52(6):409-412

    12-item clinically practical SSQ; tracks change including bilateral/asymmetry effects.

  • 2013
    Gordon KA, Wong DDE, Papsin BCBilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deafBrain; 136(5):1609-1625
    doi:10.1093/brain/awt052PMID 23576127gordon2013-bilateral-protects

    Dipole moments became abnormally high in cortex contralateral to first implant once unilateral CI use exceeded ~1.5 years; aural-preference / sensitive-period evidence.

  • 2013
    Francart T, McDermott HJPsychophysics, Fitting, and Signal Processing for Combined Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant StimulationEar and Hearing; 34(6):685-700

    Comprehensive review of bimodal psychophysics, fitting and signal processing; loudness balance, frequency/timing mismatch, binaural cue access with CI+HA. Anchors modules 14 and 15.

  • 2013
    Sunde J, Webb JB, Moore PC, Gluth MB, Dornhoffer JLCochlear implant failure, revision, and reimplantationOtology & Neurotology; 34(9):1670-1674

    Revision/reimplantation series; soft failures present earlier but reach revision later, and may have poorer immediate auditory recovery.

  • 2013
    Yan F, Li J, Xian J, Wang Z, Mo LThe cochlear nerve canal and internal auditory canal in children with normal cochlea but cochlear nerve deficiencyActa Radiologica; 54(3):292-8

    Narrow BCNC (<1.5 mm) common in CND even with a normal-appearing cochlea.

  • 2013
    Eshraghi AAMolecular mechanisms involved in cochlear implantation trauma and the protection of hearing and auditory sensory cells by inhibition of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase signalingThe Laryngoscope; 123(Suppl S1):S1-S14

    JNK signalling cascade after electrode-insertion trauma and pharmacological rescue; supports otoprotective drug strategies.

  • 2013
    Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, et alTowards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification systemActa Oto-Laryngologica Supplementum; 133(Suppl 564):3-13

    Consensus HEARRING classification of hearing preservation (complete / partial / minimal / loss) by pre- vs post-op residual hearing.

  • 2013
    Rajan GP, Kontorinis G, Kuthubutheen JThe effects of insertion speed on inner ear function during cochlear implantation: a comparison studyAudiology and Neurotology; 18(1):17-22

    15 mm/min vs 60 mm/min insertion; slower speed improves hearing/vestibular preservation.

  • 2013
    Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Polak M, Driscoll CLW, et al.Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environmentsEar and Hearing; 34(4):413-425

    Preserved acoustic hearing gives a measurable speech-in-noise advantage (~2 dB SNR / 6-12%) over electric-only listening.

  • 2013
    Colletti L, Mandala M, Colletti VLong-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defectsOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

    Long-term durability of round-window coupling when no usable chain remains.

  • 2013
    Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, et al.A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the Vibrant Soundbridge for patients with mixed or conductive hearing lossInternational Journal of Audiology

    Benchmarks window-coupled gain against conventional aids in mixed/conductive loss.

  • 2013
    Khing PP, Swanson BA, Ambikairajah EThe effect of automatic gain control structure and release time on cochlear implant speech intelligibilityPLoS One

    Directly shows how AGC structure and release time shape intelligibility.

  • 2013
    Imennov NS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Jameyson E, Rubinstein JTDetection of acoustic temporal fine structure by cochlear implant listeners: behavioral results and computational modelingHearing Research

    Documents the limited fine-structure access of implant users and its perceptual consequences.

  • 2013
    Nicholas JG, Geers AESpoken language benefits of extending cochlear implant candidacy below 12 months of ageOtology and Neurotology

    Supports the sensitive-period rationale central to the case for acting early.

  • 2013
    Noel-Petroff N, Mathias N, Ulmann C, Van Den Abbeele TPediatric Evaluation of the ClearVoice Speech Enhancement Algorithm in Everyday LifeAudiology Research

    Everyday-life evaluation supporting comfort and acceptance over raw score gains in children.

  • 2013
    Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer E, Mills E, Mulder HE, Goldbeck F, et al.Evaluation of speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients using a personal digital adaptive radio frequency systemJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Shows adaptive digital RM outperforms fixed-gain and adaptive analogue FM, with the gap widening in louder noise.

  • 2013
    Wolfe J, Schafer E, Parkinson A, John A, Hudson M, Wheeler J, et al.Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implantsEar and Hearing

    Compares personal FM system types and processor input processing for CI users in noise.

  • 2013
    Schafer EC, Huynh C, Romine D, Jimenez RSpeech recognition and subjective perceptions of neck-loop FM receivers with cochlear implantsAmerican Journal of Audiology

    CI-specific evidence that a neck-loop coupled via the telecoil improves speech recognition in noise.

  • 2013
    Schafer EC, Romine D, Musgrave E, Momin S, Huynh CElectromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation (FM) receivers to cochlear implant sound processorsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Compares telecoil (electromagnetic) versus direct (electrical) coupling, informing telecoil-versus-wireless choices.

  • 2012
    Shapiro WH, Bradham TSCochlear implant programmingOtolaryngologic Clinics of North America; 45(1):111–127

    Programming review including a troubleshooting section.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2012
    Park SH, Kim E, Lee HJ, et al.Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant usersKorean Journal of Audiology; 16(1):6–9

    Stimulation-rate effects on performance — basis for adjusting rate when troubleshooting.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2012
  • 2012
    Monasta L, Ronfani L, Marchetti F, et al.Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimatesPLoS One; 7(4):e36226

    ~31 million chronic suppurative otitis media episodes/year; ~21,000 deaths; the burden falls heavily on South Asia, including India.

    Cited in: Overview — counting hearing loss, Causes & risk factors in India, Chronic ear disease & preventable loss, Congenital & childhood hearing loss

  • 2012
    Kral A, Sharma ADevelopmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantationTrends in Neurosciences; 35(2):111–122

    Synthesis of the developmental sensitive period for central auditory maturation after cochlear implantation, including the decoupling of cortical layers when input arrives too late.

    Cited in: Overview — the plastic brain, Cross-modal plasticity, The sensitive period for hearing, The implant as environmental input, Age at implantation & outcomes, The paradox of plasticity

  • 2012
    Eppsteiner RW, Shearer AE, Hildebrand MS, et al.Prediction of cochlear implant performance by genetic mutation: the spiral ganglion hypothesisHearing Research; 292(1–2):51–58

    The central thesis: mutations in genes expressed in the membranous labyrinth implant well; those expressed in the spiral ganglion may perform poorly, because they damage the implant's neural target.

    Cited in: Overview — genes, deafness & the implant, GJB2 & the connexins, The deafness-gene landscape, The spiral-ganglion hypothesis, Genotype-specific CI outcomes, Auditory neuropathy & OTOF, Counselling, recurrence & ethics, Predicting the outcome

  • 2012
    Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM, et alDevelopment and validation of the AzBio sentence listsEar and Hearing; 33(1):112–117

    The validated recorded-sentence test now widely used in cochlear-implant candidacy and outcome assessment.

    Cited in: The audiological battery

  • 2012
    Ruckenstein MJ (ed)Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Hearing DevicesPlural Publishing
    ruckenstein2012

    Reference text on implant hardware and electrode design — platinum-iridium contacts, silicone carrier, array geometry.

    Cited in: Advanced Bionics: 16 Current Sources and Current Steering, The MED-EL Philosophy: Long, Flexible, Lateral-Wall, Why 22 Electrodes Behave Like 8 Channels, The Three Array Families: Lateral-Wall, Perimodiolar, Mid-Scala, Materials, Reliability and MRI, Special Arrays for the Difficult Cochlea, Falls and the Older Recipient

  • 2012
    Müller J, Brill S, Hagen R, et alClinical Trial Results with the MED-EL Fine Structure Processing Coding Strategy in Experienced Cochlear Implant UsersORL; Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties; 74(4):185-198

    FSP/FS4 clinical trial (MED-EL).

    Cited in: Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling

  • 2012
    Zhu Z, Tang Q, Zeng FG, Guan T, Ye DCochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulationHearing Research; 283(1-2):45-58

    Stimulation-mode spatial selectivity (mono/bipolar/tripolar).

    Cited in: Virtual Channels: Current Steering and Current Focusing

  • 2012
    Mc Laughlin M, Lu T, Dimitrijevic A, Zeng FGTowards a closed-loop cochlear implant system: application of embedded monitoring of peripheral and central neural activityIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering; 20(4):443-454

    Closed-loop CI concept.

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2012
    Rubinstein JT, Bierer S, Kaneko C, Ling L, Nie K, Oxford T, Newlands S, Santos F, Risi F, Abbas PJ, Phillips JOImplantation of the semicircular canals with preservation of hearing and rotational sensitivity: a vestibular neurostimulator suitable for clinical researchOtol Neurotol 2012;33(5):789-796; 33(5):789-796

    UW/Nucleus device; 150-um electrodes; hearing preserved in 5/8 monkeys.

    Cited in: Atraumatic Surgery: Preserving Hearing and Balance Together, The Vestibular and Cochleovestibular Implant Frontier

  • 2012
    Coordes A, Basta D, Götze R, Scholz S, Seidl RO, Ernst A, Todt ISound-induced vertigo after cochlear implantationOtol Neurotol 2012;33(3):335-342; 33(3):335-342

    Tullio phenomenon / sound-induced vertigo post-CI.

    Cited in: The Dizzy Patient After Implantation

  • 2012
    Mackeith S, Joy R, Robinson P, Hajioff DPre-operative imaging for cochlear implantation: magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or both?Cochlear Implants International; 13(3):133-136

    Supports MRI as a sufficient first-line modality with CT reserved for selected cases.

  • 2012
    Mandalà M, Colletti L, Tonoli G, Colletti VElectrocochleography during cochlear implantation for hearing preservationOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 146(5):774–781

    Real-time intraoperative ECoG feedback improved hearing-preservation rates.

  • 2012
    Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venail F, et al.Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over timePLoS ONE; 7(11):e48739

    2,251-patient model; ~22% of variance explained; HA use during profound period as a factor.

  • 2012
    Kral A, Sharma ADevelopmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantationTrends in Neurosciences; 35(2):111-122

    Sensitive period, cortical decoupling and cross-modal reorganisation after implantation.

  • 2012
    Zeitler DM, Anwar A, Green JE, et al.Cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened adolescentsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine; 166(1):35-41

    Outcomes and predictors in late-implanted prelingual adolescents.

  • 2012
    Boons T, Brokx JPL, Frijns JHM, et al.Effect of pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation on language developmentArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine; 166(1):28-34

    Bilateral implantation an independent predictor of better receptive and expressive language; supports early bilateral access.

  • 2012
    Mercier PP, Lysaght AC, Bandyopadhyay S, Chandrakasan AP, Stankovic KMEnergy extraction from the biologic battery in the inner earNature Biotechnology; 30(12):1240-1243
    doi:10.1038/nbt.2394PMID 23138225mercier2012-biobattery

    Proof-of-concept energy harvesting from the endocochlear potential in guinea pig; >=1.12 nW extracted for up to 5 h powering a wireless EP-monitoring transmitter. Preclinical, far below CI power needs - aspirational only.

  • 2012
    Pakdaman MN, Herrmann BS, Curtin HD, Van Beek-King J, Lee DJCochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy: a systematic reviewOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; 146(2):180-190

    Systematic review of 311 patients across 22 studies; outcomes stratified by anatomical severity; common cavity and severe dysplasias have poorer but real benefit.

  • 2012
    Joshi VM, Navlekar SK, Kishore GR, Reddy KJ, Kumar ECVCT and MR Imaging of the Inner Ear and Brain in Children with Congenital Sensorineural Hearing LossRadioGraphics; 32(3):683-698

    Complementary CT (bony labyrinth, modiolus, VA, BCNC, facial canal) and MRI (membranous labyrinth fluid, parasagittal-oblique cochlear-nerve visualisation in the IAC) for the CI work-up. Source for the structured imaging checklist.

  • 2012
    Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll VMusic appreciation and training for cochlear implant recipients: a reviewSeminars in Hearing; 33(4):307-334

    Review establishing appraisal/enjoyment as a valid outcome distinct from perceptual accuracy; training and environmental control improve enjoyment.

  • 2012
    Rajan GP, Kuthubutheen J, Hedne N, Krishnaswamy JThe role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: a prospective clinical studyThe Laryngoscope; 122(1):190-195

    Preoperative intratympanic glucocorticoids improve/stabilise hearing preservation in round-window CI.

  • 2012
    Cima RFF, Maes IH, Joore MA, Scheyen DJWM, El Refaie A, Baguley DM, Anteunis LJC, van Breukelen GJP, Vlaeyen JWSSpecialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: a randomised controlled trialLancet 2012;379(9830):1951-1959; 379(9830):1951-1959

    Maastricht stepped-care CBT trial; specialised CBT-based care superior to usual care for tinnitus-related quality of life and distress. Anchors the CBT/TRT recommendation.

  • 2012
    Iwasaki S, Suzuki H, Moteki H, Miyagawa M, et al.Experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge RW-Coupler for round window vibroplasty with tympanosclerosisActa Oto-Laryngologica

    Clinical use of the dedicated round-window coupler and its placement.

  • 2012
    Crew JD, Galvin JJ, Fu QJChannel interaction limits melodic pitch perception in simulated cochlear implantsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Directly ties channel interaction to the breakdown of melodic pitch perception.

  • 2012
    Sennaroglu L, Ziyal IAuditory brainstem implantationAuris Nasus Larynx

    Describes management of non-auditory percepts within the ABI fitting workflow.

  • 2012
    Sanna M, Di Lella F, Guida M, Merkus PAuditory brainstem implants in NF2 patients: results and review of the literatureOtol Neurotol

    Surgical experience and outcome review of ABI in NF2, including placement challenges.

  • 2012
    Humphries T, Kushalnagar P, Mathur G, Napoli DJ, Padden C, Rathmann C, Smith SRLanguage acquisition for deaf children: reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approachesHarm Reduction Journal

    Frames withholding sign as a harm and grounds the critical-period rationale.

  • 2012
    Hassanzadeh SOutcomes of cochlear implantation in deaf children of deaf parents: comparative studyThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology

    Native-signing deaf-of-deaf children showed implant outcomes at least comparable to deaf-of-hearing peers.

  • 2011
    Tang Q, Benitez R, Zeng FGSpatial channel interactions in cochlear implantsJournal of Neural Engineering; 8(4):046029

    Quantifies spatial channel interaction relevant to spread of excitation.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions

  • 2011
    Holden LK, Reeder RM, Firszt JB, et al.Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant systemInternational Journal of Audiology; 50(4):255–269

    Measuring T-levels (not defaulting to 10% of M) improves low-level audibility.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP, Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2011
    Shearer AE, Hildebrand MS, Sloan CM, Smith RJDeafness in the genomics eraHearing Research; 282(1–2):1–9

    Review of next-generation sequencing as applied to hereditary hearing loss.

    Cited in: The deafness-gene landscape, Testing — from Sanger to next-generation, Gene therapy & the genomic future

  • 2011
    Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, et alHearing loss and incident dementiaArchives of Neurology; 68(2):214–220

    Baltimore Longitudinal Study evidence that hearing loss independently predicts incident dementia — part of the rationale for treating hearing loss, including by implantation, in older adults.

    Cited in: Cognition, dementia & the elderly

  • 2011
    Lin FR, Ferrucci L, Metter EJ, et alHearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of AgingNeuropsychology; 25(6):763–770

    Greater hearing loss is associated with poorer memory and executive function — supporting the cognitive case for not withholding implantation from older candidates.

    Cited in: Cognition, dementia & the elderly

  • 2011
    Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, et alComparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitusOtology & Neurotology; 32(1):39–47

    Foundational single-sided-deafness evidence: the implant beats CROS and Baha for speech in noise and localisation, and suppresses ipsilateral tinnitus.

    Cited in: The expanding indications

  • 2011
    Magnusson LComparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound qualityInternational Journal of Audiology; 50(4):279-287

    FSP vs CIS (MED-EL fine structure).

  • 2011
    Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Selberherr A, et alEnvelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover studyOtology & Neurotology; 32(7):1094-1101

    FS vs CIS-envelope (no significant difference found).

    Cited in: Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling

  • 2011
    Shannon RV, Cruz RJ, Galvin JJ 3rdEffect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noiseAudiology & Neuro-Otology, 16(2), 113-123; 16(2):113-123; PMC2948665

    7 AB CII users; only significant rate effect = vowels in quiet (+5.23 pp from 600 to 4800 ppse).

  • 2011
    Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Selberherr A, Kaider A, Blineder M, Starlinger V, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner CEnvelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover studyOtology & Neurotology, 32(7), 1094-1101; 32(7):1094-1101

    CIS vs FSP at identical frequency spectrum (n=31); no significant difference; benefit attributed to extended low frequencies.

    Cited in: Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling

  • 2011
    Donaldson GS, Dawson PK, Borden LZWithin-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivityEar and Hearing, 32(2), 238-250; 32(2):238-250

    No overall strategy effect on speech (small HiRes edge for consonants); only 3/10 improved any spectral cue with F120.

    Cited in: The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2011
    Enticott JC, Eastwood HT, Briggs RJ, Dowell RC, O'Leary SJMethylprednisolone applied directly to the round window reduces dizziness after cochlear implantation: a randomized clinical trialAudiol Neurootol 2011;16(5):289-303; 16(5):289-303

    RCT - round-window steroid reduces post-op dizziness.

    Cited in: Atraumatic Surgery: Preserving Hearing and Balance Together

  • 2011
    Chiang B, Fridman GY, Dai C, Rahman MA, Della Santina CCDesign and performance of a multichannel vestibular prosthesis that restores semicircular canal sensation in rhesus monkeyIEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011;19(5):588-598; 19(5):588-598

    MVP2 device restoring SCC sensation in rhesus monkey.

    Cited in: The Vestibular and Cochleovestibular Implant Frontier

  • 2011
    Lu T, Djalilian H, Zeng FG, Chen H, Sun XAn integrated vestibular-cochlear prosthesis for restoring balance and hearingConf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:1319-1322; 2011:1319-1322

    Combined vestibulocochlear implant concept.

    Cited in: The Vestibular and Cochleovestibular Implant Frontier

  • 2011
    Guyot JP, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M, Kos MIAdaptation to steady-state electrical stimulation of the vestibular system in humansAnn Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120(3):143-149; 120(3):143-149

    Four human subjects with vestibular implant showing EVORs/adaptation.

    Cited in: The Vestibular and Cochleovestibular Implant Frontier

  • 2011
    Umansky AM, Jeffe DB, Lieu JEThe HEAR-QL: Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children With Hearing LossJournal of the American Academy of Audiology, 22(10):644-653; 22(10):644-653

    Candidate journal was wrong: 'Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(3):326-345' is incorrect; verified record is J Am Acad Audiol 22(10):644-653.

  • 2011
    Markman TM, Quittner AL, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA, Thal D, Niparko JK, Wang NY, CDaCI Investigative TeamLanguage development after cochlear implantation: an epigenetic modelJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 388-404

    DOI confirmed via Crossref/EuropePMC. Candidate PMID 21909844 was WRONG (points to Stewart et al., abdominoperineal resection); correct PMID is 22101809.

  • 2011
    Souter MA, Briggs RJ, Wright CG, Roland PSRound window insertion of precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays: how successful is it?Otology & Neurotology; 32(1):58–63

    Feasibility and success of round-window insertion across array types.

  • 2011
    Geers AE, Hayes HReading, writing, and phonological processing skills of adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experienceEar and Hearing; 32(1 Suppl):49S-59S

    Literacy and reading achievement in long-term paediatric CI users.

  • 2011
    Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci LHearing loss and incident dementiaArchives of Neurology; 68(2):214-220

    Untreated hearing loss associated with increased incident dementia risk.

  • 2011
    Sparreboom M, Snik AFM, Mylanus EAMSequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: development of the primary auditory abilities of bilateral stimulationAudiology & Neurotology; 16(4):203-213
    doi:10.1159/000320270PMID 20980740sparreboom2011-development

    29 children; bilateral advantage emerges after sequential implantation and grows with bilateral experience.

  • 2011
    Cullington HE, Zeng FGComparison of Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users on Speech Recognition With Competing Talker, Music Perception, Affective Prosody Discrimination, and Talker IdentificationEar and Hearing; 32(1):16-30
    doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181edfbd2PMID 21178567cullington2011bimodalbilateral

    Bimodal users matched or modestly exceeded bilateral users on competing-talker speech, music, prosody and talker ID (differences nonsignificant).

  • 2011
    Buchman CA, Teagle HFB, Roush PA, Park LR, Hatch D, Woodard J, Zdanski C, Adunka OFCochlear implantation in children with labyrinthine anomalies and cochlear nerve deficiency: implications for auditory brainstem implantationThe Laryngoscope; 121(9):1979-88

    Outcomes in IEM/CND children; variable CI benefit with hypoplasia, poor with aplasia, supports ABI consideration.

  • 2011
    Song MH, Cho HJ, Lee HK, Kwon TJ, Lee WS, Oh SH, Bok J, Choi JY, Kim UKCHD7 Mutational Analysis and Clinical Considerations for Auditory Rehabilitation in Deaf Patients with CHARGE SyndromePLoS ONE; 6(9):e24511

    CHD7 mutations in CHARGE with semicircular-canal aplasia and cochleovestibular nerve deficiency; CI outcomes depend on nerve calibre and absence of severe cognitive impairment, ABI when CI fails. Source for CHARGE genotype-outcome link.

  • 2011
    Brockmeier SJ, Fitzgerald D, Searle O, Fitzgerald H, Grasmeder M, Hilbig S, Vermiere K, Peterreins M, Heydner S, Arnold WThe MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant usersCochlear Implants International; 12(1):10-20

    MuSIC test battery; used alongside the Munich Music Questionnaire to assess perception and appraisal in CI users.

  • 2011
    Kraus EM, Shohet JA, Catalano PJEnvoy Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System: phase 2 trial, 1-year hearing resultsOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

    Pivotal trial of the piezoelectric fully implantable Esteem driving the ossicular chain.

  • 2011
    Heng J, Cantarero G, Elhilali M, Limb CJImpaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant usersHearing Research

    Connects lost fine structure to the specific failure of musical timbre perception.

  • 2011
    Won JH, Drennan WR, Nie K, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JTAcoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listenersJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Connects temporal modulation sensitivity to speech recognition, anchoring the temporal toolbox.

  • 2011
    Sennaroglu L, Colletti V, Manrique M, Laszig R, Offeciers E, Saeed S, et alAuditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statementOtol Neurotol

    Ankara consensus defining paediatric/non-tumour candidacy and age window.

  • 2011
    Chung K, McKibben NMicrophone directionality, pre-emphasis filter, and wind noise in cochlear implantsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology

    Explains the wind-noise scene and why processors include dedicated wind handling.

  • 2010
    Botros A, Psarros CNeural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fittingEar and Hearing; 31(3):367–379

    Profile-based use of ECAP thresholds for MAP estimation.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, ECAP threshold & functions, Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2010
    Hofmann M, Wouters JElectrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant usersJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 11(2):267–282

    Reliable scalp-recorded eASSR separable from CI artifact — a route to objective, frequency-specific thresholds.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2010
    Teagle HF, Roush PA, Woodard JS, et al.Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorderEar and Hearing; 31(3):325–335

    Present vs absent ECAP/NRT predicts open-set speech in ANSD children.

    Cited in: Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2010
    Gulya AJ, Minor LB, Poe DS (eds.)Glasscock–Shambaugh Surgery of the EarPeople's Medical Publishing House-USA, Shelton, CT; 6th edition (Ch. 4, Starlinger, Masaki & Heller, Auditory Physiology: Inner Ear)

    Molecular inner-ear physiology: transduction apparatus, prestin, stria vascularis, K⁺ recycling, and deafness genetics.

    Cited in: Organ of Corti & hair cells, Mechanoelectrical transduction, The cochlear amplifier, The auditory nerve

  • 2010
  • 2010
    Niparko JK, Tobey EA, Thal DJ, et al.Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantationJAMA; 303(15):1498–1506

    CDaCI cohort: younger age at implantation predicts faster spoken-language growth.

    Cited in: Age at implantation & outcomes, Paediatric candidacy

  • 2010
    Dorrn AL, Yuan K, Barker AJ, Schreiner CE, Froemke RCDevelopmental sensory experience balances cortical excitation and inhibitionNature; 465(7300):932–936

    Excitatory–inhibitory balance in auditory cortex emerges experience-dependently over the first postnatal month — a cellular instance of activity shaping cortical structure.

    Cited in: Critical & sensitive periods

  • 2010
    Shearer AE, DeLuca AP, Hildebrand MS, et al.Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA; 107(49):21104–21109

    Targeted genomic enrichment + massively parallel sequencing (OtoSCOPE) makes it feasible to screen all known deafness genes simultaneously.

    Cited in: Testing — from Sanger to next-generation

  • 2010
    Merchant SN, Nadol JB Jr (eds)Schuknecht's Pathology of the EarPeople's Medical Publishing House, 3rd edition
    ISBN 9781550093452merchantnadol2010

    The standard reference on otopathology — the temporal-bone basis for the causes of sensorineural hearing loss and what each leaves in the cochlea and nerve.

    Cited in: Overview — why the cause matters, Ménière's & cochlear otosclerosis, What the temporal bone reveals

  • 2010
    Bierer JAProbing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulationTrends in Amplification; 14(2):84–95

    Focused (tripolar) stimulation as a tool to sharpen the current field and probe channels with poor electrode–neuron interfaces — the rationale for current focusing.

    Cited in: Current focusing & virtual channels

  • 2010
    Carlson ML, Breen JT, Gifford RH, et alCochlear implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarianOtology & Neurotology; 31(8):1343–1349

    Octogenarians and nonagenarians achieve speech outcomes close to younger recipients and tolerate surgery well — evidence that age alone is not a contraindication.

    Cited in: Cognition, dementia & the elderly

  • 2010
    Mahalakshmi P, Reddy MRSignal analysis by using FIR filter banks in cochlear implant prostheses2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology (ICSMB), IEEE; 253-258

    Filter-bank work (filter count vs channels).

    Cited in: The Lineage at a Glance: Why Coding Strategies Keep Changing, One Electrode, One Sound: The Single-Channel Era

  • 2010
    Brown CA, Bacon SPFundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noiseHearing Research; 266(1-2):52-59

    F0 and intelligibility in noise (voicing).

    Cited in: Tracking the Voice: F0/F2 Formant Extraction

  • 2010
    Drennan WR, Won JH, Nie K, Jameyson E, Rubinstein JTSensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant usersHearing Research, 262(1-2), 1-8; 262(1-2):1-8

    Spectral ripple better with F120 (3.42 vs 2.31 RPO) but Schroeder-phase temporal cue worse (all 9 at chance vs 5/9).

    Cited in: The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2010
    Rubin LG, Papsin B; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Section on Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryCochlear Implants in Children: Surgical Site Infections and Prevention and Treatment of Acute Otitis Media and MeningitisPediatrics, 126(2):381-391

    Candidate PMID 20660551 was WRONG (points to an unrelated iron-deficiency-anemia study). Correct PMID is 20660544; named authors Rubin LG, Papsin B. Title/journal/volume/issue/pages confirmed.

  • 2010
    Gulya AJ, Minor LB, Poe DS (eds)Glasscock-Shambaugh Surgery of the EarPeople's Medical Publishing House (BC Decker); 6th edition
    glasscockshambaugh2010

    Comprehensive otologic surgery and temporal-bone anatomy reference.

  • 2010
    Basta D, Todt I, Ernst AAudiological outcome of the pull-back technique in cochlear implanteesThe Laryngoscope; 120(7):1391–1396

    Pull-back (pull-through) perimodiolar array technique and outcomes.

  • 2010
    Habib MG, Waltzman SB, Tajudeen B, Svirsky MASpeech production intelligibility of early implanted pediatric cochlear implant usersInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology; 74(8):855-859

    Intelligibility by age-at-implant band (~93% vs ~80%).

  • 2010
    Stacey PC, Raine CH, O'Donoghue GM, et al.Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training for adult users of cochlear implantsInternational Journal of Audiology; 49(5):347-356

    Home computer-based training for adult CI users.

  • 2010
    Acoustical Society of America (ANSI/ASA)Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools, Part 1: Permanent Schools (ANSI/ASA S12.60-2010/Part 1)American National Standards Institute / Acoustical Society of America; S12.60-2010/Part 1
    ansiasa2010

    Classroom acoustic targets (~35 dBA background noise, ~0.6 s reverberation).

  • 2010
    Dunn CC, Noble W, Tyler RS, Kordus M, Gantz BJ, Ji HBilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users compared on speech perception in noiseEar and Hearing; 31(2):296-298

    Bilateral group outperforms matched unilateral users on speech-in-noise and localization.

  • 2010
    Gordon KA, Wong DDE, Papsin BCCortical function in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously or after a period of interimplant delayOtology & Neurotology; 31(8):1293-1299

    Toronto group; simultaneous vs sequential cortical maturation; longer interimplant delay leaves the late ear with abnormal cortical responses.

  • 2010
    Hansen S, Anthonsen K, Stangerup SE, Jensen JH, Thomsen J, Caye-Thomasen PUnexpected findings and surgical complications in 505 consecutive cochlear implantations: a proposal for reporting consensusActa Oto-Laryngologica; 130(5):540-549

    505 implantations; major complication rate 1.8%, overall complication rate 29.1% (minor dominate). Argues for a shared reporting taxonomy.

  • 2010
    Battmer RD, Backous DD, Balkany TJ, Briggs RJS, Gantz BJ, van Hasselt A, Kim CS, Kubo T, Lenarz T, Pillsbury HC 3rd, O'Donoghue GMInternational classification of reliability for implanted cochlear implant receiver stimulatorsOtology & Neurotology; 31(8):1190-1193

    Consensus group (formed 2005) standardising device-failure definitions, survival time, and cumulative survival (CSP) reporting by manufacturers.

  • 2010
    Chung D, Kim AH, Parisier S, Linstrom C, Alexiades G, Hoffman R, Kohan DRevision cochlear implant surgery in patients with suspected soft failuresOtology & Neurotology; 31(8):1194-1198

    76% of revision cases presented with aversive symptoms or performance decline while the device maintained lock (suspected soft failure).

  • 2010
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KFIdentifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curvesEar and Hearing; 31(2):247-258

    Uses focused (partial tripolar) thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves to detect channels with a degraded electrode-neuron interface. Central evidence that the interface, not channel count, limits performance (modules 5 and 6).

  • 2010
    Rodríguez C, Gómez P, Rodríguez J, et al.Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implantsCochlear Implants International; 11 Suppl 1:461-464

    Early demonstration of clinician-led remote programming over a network connection.

  • 2010
    Sennaroğlu LCochlear implantation in inner ear malformations - a review articleCochlear Implants International; 11(1):4-41

    Comprehensive review; inner ear malformations ~20% of congenital SNHL; surgical pitfalls of gusher and aberrant facial nerve; subclassification of incomplete partition and cochlear hypoplasia.

  • 2010
    Chang A, Eastwood H, Sly D, James D, Richardson R, O'Leary SRound window delivery of dexamethasone ameliorates local and remote hearing loss produced by cochlear implantation into the second turn of the guinea pig cochleaHearing Research; 266(1-2):41-46

    Local and remote otoprotection from round-window dexamethasone.

  • 2010
    Della Santina CC, Migliaccio AA, Hayden R, Melvin TA, Fridman GY, Chiang B, Davidovics NS, Dai C, Carey JP, Minor LB, Anderson IC, Park H, Lyford-Pike S, Tang SCurrent and future management of bilateral loss of vestibular sensation - an update on the Johns Hopkins Multichannel Vestibular Prosthesis ProjectCochlear Implants International; 11(Suppl 2):2-11

    Review of the Johns Hopkins MVP: gyroscopes, microprocessor, multichannel canal electrodes, current steering.

  • 2010
    Bruschini L, Forli F, Passetti S, Bruschini P, et al.Fully implantable Otologics MET Carina device for the treatment of sensorineural and mixed hearing loss: audio-otological resultsActa Oto-Laryngologica

    Clinical results of the fully implantable electromagnetic Carina driving the incus.

  • 2010
    Luo X, Galvin JJ, Fu QJEffects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implantsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Stimulus and carrier parameters modulate envelope-processing sensitivity.

  • 2010
    Macherey O, Carlyon RPTemporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implantJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
    doi:10.1121/1.3269042PMID 20058981macherey2010dualchannel

    Stimulation patterns aimed at extending or shaping temporal pitch beyond single-channel limits.

  • 2010
    Won JH, Drennan WR, Kang RS, Rubinstein JTPsychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant usersEar and Hearing

    Demonstrates that the same psychophysical battery predicts music as well as speech outcomes.

  • 2010
    Colletti V, Shannon RV, Carner M, Veronese S, Colletti LComplications in auditory brainstem implant surgery in adults and childrenOtology & Neurotology

    Quantifies non-auditory side-effects and notes that many diminish over time.

  • 2010
    Blume SThe Artificial Ear: Cochlear Implants and the Culture of DeafnessRutgers University Press
    ISBN 9780813547985blume2010artificialear

    Sociological history of how the CI became a flashpoint between medicine and the Deaf world.

  • 2010
    Kushalnagar P, Mathur G, Moreland CJ, Napoli DJ, Osterling W, Padden C, Rathmann CInfants and children with hearing loss need early language accessJournal of Clinical Ethics
    PMID 20866021kushalnagar2010access

    Argues early accessible language is a developmental necessity, not a cultural option.

  • 2010
    Camporesi SChoosing deafness with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an ethical way to carry on a cultural bloodline?Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

    Examines the cultural-bloodline argument for selecting for deafness and the cases behind it.

  • 2010
    Sparrow RImplants and ethnocide: learning from the cochlear implant controversyDisability and Society

    Bioethical analysis distinguishing the adult/self-determination case from the paediatric controversy.

  • 2010
    U.S. Department of Justice2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design: Assistive Listening Systems (Section 219 / 706)ADA.gov (U.S. Department of Justice)
    ada2010als

    Authoritative legal basis requiring ALS in assembly areas with a PA system.

  • 2009
    Saoji AA, Litvak LM, Hughes MLExcitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipientsEar and Hearing; 30(5):559–567

    Dual-electrode excitation patterns and channel interaction.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions

  • 2009
  • 2009
    Ryugo DK, Limb CJBrain plasticity: the impact of the environment on the brain as it relates to hearing and deafnessIn: Niparko JK (ed.), Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia; Ch. 2, pp. 19–38
    ISBN 9780781777490ryugolimb2009

    Foundational review tying developmental plasticity and the environment to hearing and deafness.

    Cited in: Overview — the plastic brain, Critical & sensitive periods, Lessons from the visual system, Competition & the pluripotent cortex, The deaf brain — auditory deprivation, The implant as environmental input, Age at implantation & outcomes, Adult plasticity & rehabilitation, Binaural plasticity & bilateral CIs, The paradox of plasticity

  • 2009
    Kujawa SG, Liberman MCAdding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after 'temporary' noise-induced hearing lossThe Journal of Neuroscience; 29(45):14077–14085

    Landmark demonstration of cochlear synaptopathy — noise can permanently destroy auditory-nerve synapses even when thresholds recover, the 'hidden' neural cost of noise.

    Cited in: Noise-induced hearing loss

  • 2009
    Niparko JK (ed)Cochlear Implants: Principles & PracticesLippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2nd edition
    ISBN 9780781777490niparko2009ci

    Comprehensive reference text; the chapter on assessment of candidacy frames implantation as a multidisciplinary decision that the implant will outperform the best hearing aids.

    Cited in: Speech audiometry & rollover, Paediatric speech perception, Overview — will the implant beat the aid?, Predicting the outcome, Medical & otologic assessment, Vestibular assessment, Paediatric candidacy, The team decision, Anatomy of a Cochlear Implant System, From Sound to Nerve: The End-to-End Signal Path, Special Arrays for the Difficult Cochlea

  • 2009
    Coelho DH, Yeh J, Kim JT, Lalwani AKCochlear implantation is associated with minimal anesthetic risk in the elderlyThe Laryngoscope; 119(2):355–358

    Anaesthetic risk in elderly implant candidates tracks ASA physical-status class and comorbidity, not chronological age — fitness, not birth date, governs surgical candidacy.

    Cited in: Cognition, dementia & the elderly

  • 2009
    Bhoir DV, Panse MSAdvances in cochlear implant implementationInternational Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering; 2(8):57-59
    bhoir2009

    4-of-8 n-of-m example (grey source).

  • 2009
    Nogueira W, Litvak L, Edler B, Ostermann J, Büchner ASignal Processing Strategies for Cochlear Implants Using Current SteeringEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing; 2009(1):531213

    Current-steering / F120 spectral peak locator description.

    Cited in: Virtual Channels: Current Steering and Current Focusing

  • 2009
    Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Skinner MWSpeech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processingOtology & Neurotology, 30(2), 146-152; 30(2):146-152

    Within-subjects (n=8): CNC 57->63% (p=.023), HINT noise 61->69% (p=.043), BKB-SIN 10.2->9.2 dB (p=.037); HINT-quiet NS; 7/8 preferred HiRes 120.

    Cited in: The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2009
    Landsberger DM, Srinivasan AGVirtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipientsHearing Research, 254(1-2), 34-41; 254(1-2):34-41

    Quadrupolar (focused, sigma=0.75) virtual channels improve cumulative d' by 2.04 over monopolar (n=7).

  • 2009
    Jacot E, Van Den Abbeele T, Debre HR, Wiener-Vacher SRVestibular impairments pre- and post-cochlear implant in childrenInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73(2):209-217; 73(2):209-217

    224 children pre/post CI; 27% acute symptoms in 89-child series.

  • 2009
    Verbist BM, Ferrarini L, Briaire JJ, Zarowski A, Admiraal-Behloul F, Olofsen H, Reiber JH, Frijns JHAnatomic considerations of cochlear morphology and its implications for insertion trauma in cochlear implant surgeryOtol Neurotol 2009;30(4):471-477; 30(4):471-477

    Insertion-trauma pressure/contact points along the cochlear spiral (basal turn).

    Cited in: How Implant Surgery Injures the Labyrinth

  • 2009
    Donnelly PJ, Limb CJMusic Perception in Cochlear Implant UsersIn: Niparko JK, editor. Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 223-228; pp. 223-228
    ISBN 9780781777490donnelly2009

    Genuine book chapter verified via the Johns Hopkins Pure research record: Donnelly PJ & Limb CJ, 'Music perception in cochlear implant users,' in Niparko (ed.) Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, pp. 223-228 (Wolters Kluwer Health / Lippincott Williams & Wilkins). 2nd ed. ISBN 9780781777490. Pure lists a 2012 electronic date; book edition year is 2009.

  • 2009
    Lin FR, Niparko JK, Francis HWOutcomes in Cochlear Implantation: Assessment of Quality-of-Life Impact and Economic Evaluation of the Benefits of the Cochlear Implant In Relation to Costs (chapter in Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed., ed. John K. Niparko)Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed., edited by John K. Niparko, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009, Chapter 17, pp. 229-242

    Verified as a genuine textbook: 'Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices', 2nd ed., John K. Niparko (ed.), Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009, ISBN 978-0-7817-7749-0 confirmed via multiple booksellers/Ovid. The cited Lin/Niparko/Francis chapter on QoL/cost-utility is consistent with this volume; chapter-level page numbers and the $12,847/QALY ICER figure could not be independently confirmed but the parent textbook and ISBN are real.

  • 2009
    Mellon NKParental Response to the Diagnosis of Hearing LossIn: Niparko JK (ed). Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009; pp. 147-150

    Genuine chapter within the real textbook Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed (Niparko, Kirk, Robbins, Mellon, Rucci, eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009), ISBN-13 9780781777490 confirmed via multiple booksellers. Chapter-level metadata accepted on the verified textbook ISBN.

  • 2009
    Mellon NKPsychosocial Development of Deaf ChildrenIn: Niparko JK (ed). Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009; pp. 155-158

    Genuine chapter within the real textbook Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed (Niparko et al., 2009), ISBN-13 9780781777490 confirmed. Chapter-level metadata accepted on the verified textbook ISBN.

  • 2009
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness (Technology Appraisal TA166)NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance TA166, UK

    Confirmed real NICE guidance: TA166, published Jan 2009, 'Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness'; later updated/replaced by TA566 (7 March 2019). Candidate's title wording lightly corrected to the official short title; stable identifier is the TA number/URL.

  • 2009
    Kirk KI, Eisenberg LSClinical Investigations of Cochlear Implant Performance in ChildrenIn: Niparko JK (ed.), Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Chapter in the genuine Niparko (ed.) 2nd-edition textbook (2009, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins). Confirmed the host book's real ISBN is 978-0-7817-7749-0 (9780781777490). Candidate ISBN 978-0-7817-7246-1 was WRONG (corrected to the verified 2nd-ed ISBN).

  • 2009
    Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli JSpatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant usersEar and Hearing; 30(4):419-431

    Adults over first 6 months bilateral; RMS localization error roughly halves from unilateral to bilateral; localization and spatial speech benefit emerge with experience.

  • 2009
    Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, Elston J, Weiner G, et al.The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic modelHealth Technology Assessment (Winchester, England); 13(44):1-330

    NIHR HTA systematic review + economic model; unilateral CI cost-effective, second-side adds smaller incremental benefit at higher incremental cost (less favourable ICER, more favourable in children). Anchors module 15.

  • 2009
    Gosepath J, Lippert K, Keilmann A, Mann WJAnalysis of fifty-six cochlear implant device failuresORL; Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties; 71(3):142-147

    Catalogues hard and soft device failures and their presenting features in a large revision series.

  • 2009
    Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Shannon RVMelodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant usersAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences; 1169:518-533

    Review of MCI; current steering/virtual channels and training effects on melodic perception.

  • 2009
    Trehub SE, Vongpaisal T, Nakata TMusic in the lives of deaf children with cochlear implantsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences; 1169:534-542

    Children deafened in infancy generally enjoy music, recognise familiar songs and TV themes, and show early preference for singing despite degraded pitch transmission.

  • 2009
    Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, Oleson JJ, Reiss LA, Parkinson AJHybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary resultsAudiology & Neurotology; 14(Suppl 1):32-38

    Short-electrode hybrid EAS: hearing preservation in 85/87 at activation, 91% retained some hearing over 3 mo-5 yr; combined EAS improved speech understanding. Case for preserving low-frequency hearing.

  • 2009
    Beltrame AM, Martini A, Prosser S, Giarbini N, et al.Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to cochlea round window: auditory results in patients with mixed hearing lossOtology & Neurotology

    Demonstrates the FMT can drive the round window, broadening the device's indications.

  • 2009
    Saoji AA, Litvak L, Spahr AJ, Eddins DASpectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listenersJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Links spectral-modulation detection to speech identification, complementing the ripple measure.

  • 2009
    Sennaroglu L, Ziyal I, Atas A, Sennaroglu G, Yucel E, Sevinc S, et alPreliminary results of auditory brainstem implantation in prelingually deaf children with inner ear malformations including severe stenosis of the cochlear aperture and aplasia of the cochlear nerveOtol Neurotol

    Defines the malformation and nerve-aplasia paediatric indications for ABI.

  • 2009
    Maini S, Cohen MA, Hollow R, Briggs RUpdate on long-term results with auditory brainstem implants in NF2 patientsCochlear Implants Int

    Long-term NF2 follow-up showing continued use and gradual gains, informing realistic goals.

  • 2009
    Runge-Samuelson C, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Wackym PAElectrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the Nucleus 24 Contour electrode arrayOtology & Neurotology

    Demonstrates how array position shifts measured eABR, underpinning intraoperative steering.

  • 2009
    Colletti V, Shannon R, Carner M, Veronese S, Colletti LOutcomes in nontumor adults fitted with the auditory brainstem implant: 10 years experienceOtology & Neurotology

    Links usable-channel limits and side-effect burden to the range of ABI outcomes.

  • 2009
    Lim HH, Lenarz M, Lenarz TAuditory midbrain implant: a reviewTrends in Amplification

    Comprehensive review of AMI rationale, device, and clinical results.

  • 2009
    Leigh IW, Maxwell-McCaw D, Bat-Chava Y, Christiansen JBCorrelates of psychosocial adjustment in deaf adolescents with and without cochlear implants: a preliminary investigationJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Reminds clinicians that psychosocial outcomes, not just speech scores, define doing well.

  • 2009
    Mand C, Duncan RE, Gillam L, Collins V, Delatycki MBGenetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adultsJournal of Medical Ethics

    Empirical survey of CODA attitudes to selecting for or against deafness.

  • 2008
    Hughes ML, Stille LJPsychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implantsEar and Hearing; 29(3):435–452

    Channel interaction by ECAP and behavioural masking vs speech outcomes.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions

  • 2008
    Wilson BS, Dorman MFCochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant futureHearing Research; 242(1-2):3–21

    Landmark review of coding strategies and signal-processing parameters.

    Cited in: Overview — recreating hearing, The future of sound coding, Stimulation Modes: From Monopolar to Tripolar, The Cochlear Implant of the Future and Choosing a Device, The Lineage at a Glance: Why Coding Strategies Keep Changing, Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2008
    Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, et al.The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patientsEar and Hearing; 29(1):76–86

    EAS processor/hearing-aid settings and the acoustic–electric overlap question.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2008
    Fallon JB, Irvine DR, Shepherd RKCochlear implants and brain plasticityHearing Research; 238(1–2):110–117

    Review of how deafness and cochlear-implant stimulation reshape the central auditory pathway, linking the morphological changes to functional plasticity.

    Cited in: Up the brainstem & midbrain, The deprived auditory cortex, What stimulation restores — and its limits

  • 2008
  • 2008
    Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AMSpeech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programsAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 13(3):193–205

    Showed that HINT sentences ceiling in many candidates (falsely disqualifying genuinely disabled aid users) while AzBio does not — the evidence behind moving the candidacy battery to harder materials.

    Cited in: Speech-in-noise & valid testing, The audiological battery, Speech-in-noise & valid testing

  • 2008
    Holt RF, Svirsky MAAn exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?Ear and Hearing; 29(4):492–511

    Examines the benefit of implanting in the first year of life and the developmental case for lowering the age floor — central to paediatric candidacy timing.

    Cited in: Paediatric candidacy

  • 2008
    Rouiha K, Bachir D, Ali BAnalysis of speech processing strategies in cochlear implantsJournal of Computer Science; 4(5):372-374
    rouiha2008

    Cited for MPEAK high-frequency extraction (grey source).

    Cited in: Adding F1: The F0/F1/F2 Processor, Multipeak (MPEAK): Formants Plus High-Frequency Bands

  • 2008
    Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Kaider A, Hamzavi JSA new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channelsOtology & Neurotology, 29(6), 784-788; 29(6):784-788

    FSP vs CIS at 12/8/5/3/2 channels (n=10); no significant difference at any channel count.

  • 2008
    Todt I, Basta D, Ernst ADoes the surgical approach in cochlear implantation influence the occurrence of postoperative vertigo?Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138(1):8-12; 138(1):8-12

    Round-window approach reduced subjective dizziness vs cochleostomy.

    Cited in: Atraumatic Surgery: Preserving Hearing and Balance Together

  • 2008
    Klop WM, Boermans PP, Ferrier MB, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JHClinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adultsOtology & Neurotology, 29(5):615-621; 29(5):615-621

    Author list corrected to full author list per EuropePMC (candidate used 'et al.').

  • 2008
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJMaximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training proceduresHearing Research; 242(1-2):198-208

    Computer-based auditory training improves CI speech and music perception.

  • 2008
    Gordon KA, Valero J, Papsin BCAbnormal timing delays in auditory brainstem responses evoked by bilateral cochlear implant use in childrenOtology & Neurotology; 29(2):193-198

    Period of unilateral CI use before second implant disrupts brainstem timing (EABR latency) cues underlying binaural processing.

  • 2008
    van Hoesel RJM, Jones GL, Litovsky RYBinaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategiesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 123(4):2249-63

    Compared envelope (CIS/ACE-type) vs fine-timing coding strategies for binaural unmasking and localization in bilateral CI users. Anchors module 13 (TFS discarded by envelope coding).

  • 2008
    Venail F, Sicard M, Piron JP, Levi A, Artieres F, Uziel A, Mondain MReliability and complications of 500 consecutive cochlear implantationsArchives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery; 134(12):1276-1281

    500 consecutive implants over up to 18 years; quantifies surgical complications and device failures; major surgical complications in the low single-digit percent range.

  • 2008
    Wei BP, Shepherd RK, Robins-Browne RM, Clark GM, O'Leary SJCan we prevent cochlear implant recipients from developing pneumococcal meningitis?Clinical Infectious Diseases; 46(1):e1-e7

    Reviews CI-associated pneumococcal meningitis risk and the rationale and limits of pneumococcal vaccination as prophylaxis.

  • 2008
    Finley CC, Skinner MWRole of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomesOtology & Neurotology; 29(7):920-928

    Showed scalar location (ST vs SV) and insertion depth account for a large fraction of outcome variance; SV translocation predicts poorer CNC word scores.

  • 2008
    Wise KD, Bhatti PT, Wang J, Friedrich CRHigh-density cochlear implants with position sensing and controlHearing Research; 242(1-2):22-30

    Silicon/parylene thin-film MEMS array with up to 32 sites on 250 um centres plus integrated strain gauges for real-time insertion-position sensing. Canonical micro-fabricated next-gen array reference for module 5.

  • 2008
    Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RLIntraneural stimulation for auditory prosthesis: modiolar trunk and intracranial stimulation sitesHearing Research; 242(1-2):52-63
    doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.001PMID 18485635middlebrooks2008-intraneural-sites

    Compares intraneural stimulation sites along the auditory nerve, supporting many more independent channels by placing contacts inside the nerve (module 6).

  • 2008
    Briggs RJS, Eder HC, Seligman PM, Cowan RSC, Plant KL, Dalton J, Money DK, Patrick JFInitial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research deviceOtology & Neurotology; 29(2):114-119

    First-in-human TIKI totally implantable CI research device (3 adults, implanted from 2005, Melbourne); package-mounted internal microphone, Li-ion rechargeable battery, invisible-hearing vs external-hearing modes.

  • 2008
    Drennan WR, Rubinstein JTMusic perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilitiesJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development; 45(5):779-789

    Links music-perception deficits to underlying spectral and temporal resolution limits of electric hearing.

  • 2008
    Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson LMusic perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid usersEar and Hearing; 29(3):421-434

    CI vs HA users with similar hearing loss: HA better for pitch, melody and instrument tests; comparable for rhythm. Confirms rhythm rides on a preserved channel.

  • 2008
    Nimmons GL, Kang RS, Drennan WR, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubinstein JTClinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listenersOtology & Neurotology; 29(2):149-155

    Original development of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (CAMP) battery: pitch-direction discrimination, melody identification, timbre identification.

  • 2008
    Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PCMusic perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of AmusiaEar and Hearing; 29(4):618-626

    Applied MBEA to CI users; pitch-based subtests near chance, rhythm relatively spared.

  • 2008
    Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, Olszewski CMultivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant usersJournal of the American Academy of Audiology; 19(2):120-134

    Iowa Musical Background Questionnaire; perception and appraisal can diverge; 209 adult CI users.

  • 2008
    Reiss LA, Gantz BJ, Turner CWCochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perceptionOtology & Neurotology; 29(2):160-167

    Hybrid CI users; over time pitch sensations may be determined more by the implant map than by cochlear place, demonstrating central adaptation to frequency-place mismatch.

  • 2008
    James DP, Eastwood H, Richardson RT, O'Leary SJEffects of round window dexamethasone on residual hearing in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantationAudiology and Neurotology; 13(2):86-96

    Preoperative round-window dexamethasone protects residual hearing, especially in difficult insertions.

  • 2008
    Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder DIncapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantationAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 117(9):645-652

    Landmark series implanting single-sided-deaf patients for intractable tinnitus; tinnitus loudness and distress fell markedly with the device on.

  • 2008
    Basta D, Todt I, Goepel F, Ernst ALoss of saccular function after cochlear implantation: the diagnostic impact of intracochlear electrically elicited vestibular evoked myogenic potentialsAudiol Neurootol 2008;13(3):187-192; 13(3):187-192

    Saccular (cVEMP) function impaired in the majority of ears after CI; electrically elicited VEMP via the implant electrode. Used for otolith/cVEMP vulnerability.

  • 2008
    Wilson BS, Dorman MFCochlear implants: current designs and future possibilitiesJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

    Maps how perceptual limits shape coding strategies and programming.

  • 2008
    Pfingst BE, Burkholder-Juhasz RA, Xu L, Thompson CSAcross-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implantsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Shows electrode-to-electrode variability in temporal modulation sensitivity.

  • 2008
    Carlyon RP, Mahendran S, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Axon P, Baguley DBehavioral and physiological correlates of temporal pitch perception in electric and acoustic hearingJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Behavioural and physiological evidence on the limits and variability of temporal pitch.

  • 2008
    Nelson DA, Donaldson GS, Kreft HForward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant usersJ Acoust Soc Am

    Core method paper for measuring channel interaction via forward-masked spatial tuning curves.

  • 2008
    Berenstein CK, Mens LH, Mulder JJ, Vanpoucke FJCurrent steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurationsEar Hear

    Head-to-head clinical comparison of monopolar, tripolar and virtual-channel configurations.

  • 2008
    Luo X, Fu QJ, Wei CG, Cao KLSpeech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant usersEar and Hearing

    Shows modulation processing relates to speech outcomes across electrodes and listeners.

  • 2008
    Schwartz MS, Otto SR, Shannon RV, Hitselberger WE, Brackmann DEAuditory brainstem implantsNeurotherapeutics

    Reviews the spectrum of non-auditory sensations and strategies to suppress them.

  • 2008
    Otto SR, Shannon RV, Wilkinson EP, Hitselberger WE, McCreery DB, Moore JK, Brackmann DEAudiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implantOtology & Neurotology

    Penetrating ABI results: physical goals met but speech not improved.

  • 2007
    van Dijk B, Botros AM, Battmer RD, et al.Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implantsEar and Hearing; 28(4):558–570

    Automated ECAP threshold measurement (AutoNRT).

    Cited in: ECAP / Neural Response Telemetry, Manufacturer systems compared, Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2007
    Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M, et al.AutoNRT: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligenceArtificial Intelligence in Medicine; 40(1):15–28

    Landmark description of the AutoNRT expert-system/decision-tree algorithm — early machine intelligence in objective measures.

    Cited in: Future directions, AI & emerging tech

  • 2007
    Balkany T, Hodges A, Menapace C, et al.Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trialOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 136(5):757–762

    Wide rate range tested; most recipients preferred rates below ~1200 pps.

    Cited in: Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2007
    Gibson WP, Sanli HAuditory neuropathy: an updateEar and Hearing; 28(2 Suppl):102S–106S

    Transtympanic round-window e-ECochG/EABR for ANSD site of lesion and CI prognosis.

    Cited in: The expanding indications, Electrically-evoked ABR, Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2007
    Lang F, Vallon V, Knipper M, et al.Functional significance of channels and transporters expressed in the inner ear and kidneyAmerican Journal of Physiology — Cell Physiology; 293(4):C1187–C1208

    Ionic composition of cochlear fluids and the shared ion-transport genes of ear and kidney.

    Cited in: Mechanoelectrical transduction

  • 2007
    Froemke RC, Merzenich MM, Schreiner CEA synaptic memory trace for cortical receptive field plasticityNature; 450(7168):425–429

    Pairing a tone with nucleus-basalis (acetylcholine) activity reshapes cortical receptive fields by transiently unbalancing then re-balancing excitation and inhibition — an attention-gated mechanism for adult cortical plasticity.

    Cited in: Competition & the pluripotent cortex, Adult plasticity & rehabilitation

  • 2007
    Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, et alCurrent steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipientsOtology & Neurotology; 28(5):629–636

    Demonstrates that simultaneously stimulating adjacent electrodes evokes intermediate pitches — the basis of current steering and 'virtual channels'.

    Cited in: Current focusing & virtual channels, Advanced Bionics: 16 Current Sources and Current Steering, Virtual Channels: Current Steering and Current Focusing

  • 2007
    Souza PE, Boike KT, Witherell K, et alPrediction of speech recognition from audibility in older listeners with hearing loss: effects of age, amplification, and background noiseJournal of the American Academy of Audiology; 18(1):54–65

    Quantifies how far audibility predicts aided speech recognition — and where suprathreshold distortion and noise make audibility insufficient.

    Cited in: Beyond the audiogram, Audibility — what amplification does, Audibility vs distortion

  • 2007
    Kochkin SMarkeTrak VII: Obstacles to adult non-user adoption of hearing aidsThe Hearing Journal; 60(4):27–43
    kochkin2007

    Large consumer survey documenting that many people with hearing loss reject hearing aids for insufficient benefit, especially at severe-to-profound levels — the population a cochlear implant may serve.

    Cited in: Overview — the limits of amplification, When a hearing aid has done all it can

  • 2007
    Wackym PA, Runge-Samuelson CL, Firszt JB, et alMore challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant usersEar and Hearing; 28(2 Suppl):80S–85S

    Binaural benefit from a second implant is real but task-dependent — harder, more realistic tasks reveal the advantage that easy tests miss.

    Cited in: Bilateral & bimodal candidacy

  • 2007
    Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PAFrequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implantsJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 8(2):220–233

    Spiral-ganglion place-frequency map; the basis for tonotopic mismatch between electrode place and neural place.

    Cited in: The Electrode Array as a Frequency Ruler, Electric-Acoustic Stimulation and Hearing Preservation

  • 2007
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak LUsing current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K usersEar and Hearing; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S

    Current steering / HiRes Fidelity 120 basis.

    Cited in: Virtual Channels: Current Steering and Current Focusing

  • 2007
    Hillier SL, Hollohan VVestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunctionCochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(4):CD005397; (4):CD005397

    Vestibular rehabilitation evidence base.

    Cited in: Falls and the Older Recipient

  • 2007
    Herdman SJ, Hall CD, Schubert MC, Das VE, Tusa RJRecovery of dynamic visual acuity in bilateral vestibular hypofunctionArch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133(4):383-389; 133(4):383-389

    Vestibular-rehab recovery of dynamic visual acuity in BVH.

    Cited in: Falls and the Older Recipient

  • 2007
    Della Santina CC, Migliaccio AA, Patel AHA multichannel semicircular canal neural prosthesis using electrical stimulation to restore 3-D vestibular sensationIEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54(6 Pt 1):1016-1030; 54(6 Pt 1):1016-1030

    The multichannel vestibular prosthesis foreshadowing future BVH treatment.

    Cited in: Why Implanting the Cochlea Touches Balance, Anatomy and Physiology of the Balance Organs, The Vestibular and Cochleovestibular Implant Frontier

  • 2007
    Zanetti D, Campovecchi CB, Balzanelli C, Pasini SParoxysmal positional vertigo after cochlear implantationActa Otolaryngol 2007;127(5):452-458; 127(5):452-458

    Up to 66% of post-implant dizzy patients with positive BPPV requiring repositioning.

    Cited in: The Dizzy Patient After Implantation

  • 2007
    Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP, Mondain MTen-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implantsOtology & Neurotology, 28(5), 615-628

    Confirmed via PMID 17667770 / Europe PMC. Candidate metadata accurate; author list expanded.

  • 2007
    Lloyd S, Meerton L, Di Cuffa R, Lavy J, Graham JTaste change following cochlear implantationCochlear Implants International, 8(4):203-210

    Candidate metadata was fabricated. No Sipp/Mott/Day 2008 Archives Otolaryngology paper or DOI 10.1001/archotol.134.1.61 exists (Crossref 404). A real paper with this exact title is Lloyd et al., Cochlear Implants International 2007 (PMID 18033736, DOI verified). Corrected authors, year, source, and DOI to the real record.

  • 2007
    Nicholas JG, Geers AEWill they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing lossJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 50(4):1048-1062

    Age at implantation and whether children catch up to hearing peers.

  • 2007
    Ching TYC, van Wanrooy E, Dillon HBinaural-Bimodal Fitting or Bilateral Implantation for Managing Severe to Profound Deafness: A ReviewTrends in Amplification; 11(3):161-192

    Comparative review of bimodal fitting vs bilateral implantation; binaural redundancy and head-shadow benefits.

  • 2007
    Battmer RD, O'Donoghue GM, Lenarz TA multicenter study of device failure in European cochlear implant centersEar & Hearing; 28(2 Suppl):95S-99S

    European multicentre device-failure survey underpinning the need for standardised reliability reporting.

  • 2007
    van Wermeskerken GK, Prokop M, van Olphen AF, Albers FWIntracochlear assessment of electrode position after cochlear implant surgery by means of multislice computer tomographyEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 264(12):1405-1407

    Mid-modiolar MDCT reconstruction distinguishes scala tympani from scala vestibuli (scalar translocation).

  • 2007
    Côté M, Ferron P, Bergeron F, Bussières RCochlear reimplantation: causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performanceLaryngoscope; 117(7):1225-1235

    45 revisions in adults and children; full reinsertion in fibrous tract usually achievable; performance preserved.

  • 2007
    Wei BP, Robins-Browne RM, Shepherd RK, Azzopardi K, Clark GM, O'Leary SJAssessment of the protective effect of pneumococcal vaccination in preventing meningitis after cochlear implantationArchives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery; 133(10):987-994

    Pneumococcal vaccination protective against meningitis after CI in an animal model; supports vaccination policy.

  • 2007
    Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian MAutoNRT: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligenceArtificial Intelligence in Medicine; 40(1):15-28

    Automated objective ECAP-threshold measurement using expert-system decision trees; precursor of objective-measure-assisted fitting that is clinical now.

  • 2007
    Adunka OF, Jewells V, Buchman CAValue of computed tomography in the evaluation of children with cochlear nerve deficiencyOtology & Neurotology; 28(5):597-604

    Bony cochlear nerve canal (BCNC) width on CT as a marker of cochlear nerve deficiency.

  • 2007
    Vijayasekaran S, Halsted MJ, Boston M, Meinzen-Derr J, Bardo DME, Greinwald J, Benton CWhen is the vestibular aqueduct enlarged? A statistical analysis of the normative distribution of vestibular aqueduct sizeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology; 28(6):1133-8

    Source of the Cincinnati criteria: >1.0 mm at midpoint and/or >2.0 mm at the operculum on axial CT.

  • 2007
    Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, et alAccuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noiseEar and Hearing; 28(3):412-423

    Large cohort; CI pitch-discrimination thresholds ~7.5 semitones vs ~1.1 in normal hearing; residual acoustic hearing helps.

  • 2007
    Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Nogaki GMelodic contour identification by cochlear implant listenersEar and Hearing; 28(3):302-319

    Melodic contour identification highly variable (14-90%) in CI users vs ~95% normal hearing; small intervals worst.

  • 2007
    Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson BCochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisitedThe Laryngoscope; 117(8):1397-1402

    Round-window anatomy as atraumatic insertion portal.

  • 2007
    Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJChanges in pitch with a cochlear implant over timeJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

    Documents plastic drift of electric pitch percepts over time after activation.

  • 2007
    Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JTSpectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant usersJARO

    Validates spectral-ripple discrimination as a quick predictor of real outcomes.

  • 2007
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Samii A, Samii M, Patrick JF, Lenarz MElectrical stimulation of the midbrain for hearing restoration: insight into the functional organization of the human central auditory systemJournal of Neuroscience

    First human auditory midbrain implant trial reporting safety and outcomes.

  • 2007
    Young A, Tattersall HUniversal newborn hearing screening and early identification of deafness: parents' responses to knowing early and their expectations of child communication developmentJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Parents' experience of early identification and how framing shapes expectations.

  • 2006
    Abbas PJ, Brown CJ; in Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr (eds)Electrically evoked auditory potentials: clinical applications (in Cochlear Implants, 2nd ed)Thieme Medical Publishers, New York; 2nd edition

    Overview of the evoked-potential toolbox in cochlear implantation.

  • 2006
    Sharma A, Dorman MFCentral auditory development in children with cochlear implants: clinical implicationsAdvances in Otorhinolaryngology; 64:66–88

    Clinical use of the P1 cortical response in implanted children.

    Cited in: Electrical cortical responses

  • 2006
    Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KEAcoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implantAudiology & Neurotology; 11(Suppl 1):63–68

    Foundational short-electrode Hybrid (acoustic + electric) clinical-trial report.

    Cited in: Intraoperative ECochG

  • 2006
    Wangemann PSupporting sensory transduction: cochlear fluid homeostasis and the endocochlear potentialJournal of Physiology; 576(Pt 1):11–21

    The stria vascularis K⁺ recycling loop and generation of the endocochlear potential.

    Cited in: Mechanoelectrical transduction

  • 2006
    Hibino H, Kurachi YMolecular and physiological bases of the K+ circulation in the mammalian inner earPhysiology (Bethesda); 21:336–345

    Channel-by-channel account of cochlear potassium circulation and its disorders.

    Cited in: Mechanoelectrical transduction

  • 2006
    Darrow KN, Maison SF, Liberman MCCochlear efferent feedback balances interaural sensitivityNature Neuroscience; 9(12):1474–1476

    Lateral olivocochlear efferents balance the two ears for binaural hearing.

    Cited in: The auditory nerve

  • 2006
    Kral A, Tillein JBrain plasticity under cochlear implant stimulationAdvances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (Cochlear and Brainstem Implants, ed. Møller AR); 64:89–108

    Principles of neural plasticity and sensitive periods applied to the implanted auditory system.

    Cited in: Overview — the plastic brain, Cross-modal plasticity, The implant as environmental input, Stimulation Modes: From Monopolar to Tripolar

  • 2006
    Roux I, Safieddine S, Nouvian R, et al.Otoferlin, defective in a human deafness form, is essential for exocytosis at the auditory ribbon synapseCell; 127(2):277–289

    Otoferlin (OTOF) mediates transmitter release at the hair-cell ribbon synapse; its loss causes auditory neuropathy that a cochlear implant bypasses.

    Cited in: Genotype-specific CI outcomes, Auditory neuropathy & OTOF, Gene therapy & the genomic future

  • 2006
    Morton CC, Nance WENewborn hearing screening — a silent revolutionNew England Journal of Medicine; 354(20):2151–2164

    Landmark review of the genetic epidemiology of congenital hearing loss and the case for screening; ~1 in 500 newborns affected.

    Cited in: Overview — genes, deafness & the implant

  • 2006
    Møller ARHearing: Anatomy, Physiology, and Disorders of the Auditory SystemAcademic Press / Elsevier, 2nd edition

    Mechanistic reference for the objective battery — the generators of the auditory brainstem response, the acoustic reflex arc, otoacoustic emissions and electrocochleography.

    Cited in: The auditory brainstem response, ASSR, ECochG & cortical responses

  • 2006
    Cooper HR, Craddock LC (eds)Cochlear Implants: A Practical GuideWhurr/Wiley, 2nd edition

    UK clinical reference for the audiological work-up, aided testing, paediatric assessment and the hearing-therapist's real-life evaluation.

    Cited in: Paediatric behavioural audiometry, Paediatric speech perception

  • 2006
    Adunka OF, Roush PA, Teagle HF, et alInternal auditory canal morphology in children with cochlear nerve deficiencyOtology & Neurotology; 27(6):793–801

    Most ears with cochlear-nerve deficiency had a normal-sized internal auditory canal — so CT alone cannot exclude an absent nerve, and high-resolution MRI is mandatory in children with profound loss.

  • 2006
    Hochmair I, Nopp P, Jolly C, et alMED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the futureTrends in Amplification; 10(4):201–219

    Design philosophy of long, flexible, lateral-wall arrays and fine-structure coding.

    Cited in: The HiFocus Array Family and Naida Processors, The MED-EL Philosophy: Long, Flexible, Lateral-Wall, SYNCHRONY, FSP and the SONNET/RONDO System, The Cochlear Implant of the Future and Choosing a Device

  • 2006
    Grayden DB, Tari S, Hollow RDDifferential rate sound processing for cochlear implantsProceedings of the 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology (SST 2006); pp. 323-328
    grayden2006

    SMSP clinical rate range 250-1800 pps (grey source).

    Cited in: SMSP: Letting the Spectrum Choose

  • 2006
  • 2006
    Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Nadol JBHistopathology of the peripheral vestibular system after cochlear implantation in the humanOtol Neurotol 2006;27(1):57-64; 27(1):57-64

    n=19 temporal bones: cochlear hydrops 83%, saccular collapse 56%, saccular hydrops 22%.

    Cited in: How Implant Surgery Injures the Labyrinth

  • 2006
    Enticott JC, Tari S, Koh SM, Dowell RC, O'Leary SJCochlear implant and vestibular functionOtol Neurotol 2006;27(6):824-830; 27(6):824-830

    Up to 74% report dizziness; ~60% no significant change.

    Cited in: The Dizzy Patient After Implantation

  • 2006
    Braswell J, Rine RMEvidence that vestibular hypofunction affects reading acuity in childrenInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70(11):1957-1965; 70(11):1957-1965

    n=14; vestibular hypofunction -> poorer reading.

    Cited in: The Child's Balance and Motor Development

  • 2006
    Barton GR, Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQHearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, IV: cost-effectiveness of pediatric cochlear implantationEar & Hearing; 27(5):575-588; 27(5):575-588

    Corrected author 'Stark' -> 'Stacey PC' (third author also Summerfield AQ); pages corrected from 573-588 to 575-588. Confirmed via Europe PMC EXT_ID:16957506.

  • 2006
    Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJDecision Modelling for Health Economic EvaluationOxford University Press, Oxford

    Genuine textbook confirmed via Crossref (DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198526629.001.0001) and OUP; print ISBN 978-0-19-852662-9 (9780198526629).

  • 2006
    Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar S, Agrawal S, Parkinson A, Peters R, Lake JBilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angleEar and Hearing, 27(1):43-59

    Verified, with corrections. Candidate PMID 16446561 was WRONG (resolved to a noise-induced-hearing-loss review); correct PMID is 16446564. Candidate DOI 10.1097/01.aud.0000194309.35495.be was also wrong; correct DOI is 10.1097/01.aud.0000194515.28023.4b. Pages corrected to 43-59 (candidate said 43-52). Title/authors/year/volume otherwise confirmed; author list expanded.

  • 2006
    Fielden CAAssessment of adult patientsIn: Cooper HR, Craddock LC (eds). Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. London/Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers; Chapter 4, pp. 80-105

    Chapter within the verified 2nd-edition textbook (ISBN 9781861564818).

  • 2006
    Graham JMMedical and surgical considerationsIn: Cooper HR, Craddock LC (eds). Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. London/Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers; Chapter 8, pp. 179-197

    Chapter within the genuine 2nd-edition textbook (ISBN 9781861564818, Whurr 2006, eds Huw R. Cooper & Louise C. Craddock), confirmed via Wiley/Google Books/AbeBooks.

  • 2006
    Knutson JFPsychological aspects of cochlear implantationChapter 7 in Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide, 2nd Edition (Cooper HR, Craddock LC eds.), Whurr/Wiley, pp. 151-177

    Genuine book chapter confirmed via Wiley/eBay/Google Books listings; author John F. Knutson, Chapter 7 of the Cooper & Craddock 2nd edition (2006). ISBN of the book added.

  • 2006
    Proops DWThe cochlear implant teamIn: Cooper HR, Craddock LC (eds). Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. London/Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers; Chapter 3, pp. 70-79

    Chapter within the verified 2nd-edition textbook (ISBN 9781861564818).

  • 2006
    Kronenberg J, Migirov LThe suprameatal approach: an alternative surgical technique for cochlear implantationCochlear Implants International; 7(3):142–147

    Mastoidectomy-sparing suprameatal route.

  • 2006
    Estabrooks W (ed)Auditory-Verbal Therapy and PracticeAlexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing; Washington, DC
    ISBN 9780882001999estabrooks2006

    Principles of auditory-verbal therapy and the parent-as-primary-agent model.

  • 2006
    Colletti VAuditory outcomes in tumor vs. nontumor patients fitted with auditory brainstem implantsAdvances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; 64:167-185
    PMID 16891842collettituvnt2006

    Non-tumour ABI recipients markedly outperform NF2 recipients.

  • 2006
    Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar S, Agrawal S, Parkinson A, Peters R, Lake JBilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angleEar and Hearing; 27(1):43-59

    Minimum audible angle improves with bilateral listening; pediatric localization benefit.

  • 2006
    Eshraghi AA, He J, Mou CH, Polak M, Zine A, Bonny C, Balkany TJ, Van De Water TRD-JNKI-1 treatment prevents the progression of hearing loss in a model of cochlear implantation traumaOtology & Neurotology; 27(4):504-511

    Anti-apoptotic strategy: a JNK-signalling inhibitor (D-JNKI-1/AM-111) delivered to the cochlea prevented progressive hearing loss after implantation trauma, the proof of principle for anti-apoptotic coatings/eluents in module 4.

  • 2006
    Vongpaisal T, Trehub SE, Schellenberg EGSong recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implantsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 49(5):1091-1103

    Pediatric CI users recognise familiar songs in original/instrumental form but struggle with pitch-only melody and synthesized versions; current technology does not preclude enjoyment.

  • 2006
    Eshraghi AA, Van De Water TRCochlear implantation trauma and noise-induced hearing loss: apoptosis and therapeutic strategiesThe Anatomical Record Part A; 288(4):473-481

    Mechanistic review: insertion trauma triggers oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptotic (programmed) cell death; basis for the delayed/progressive hearing-loss cascade.

  • 2006
    Colletti V, Soli SD, Carner M, Colletti LTreatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round windowInternational Journal of Audiology

    Seminal description of round-window vibroplasty for mixed hearing loss.

  • 2006
    Sridhar D, Stakhovskaya O, Leake PAA frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglionAudiology and Neurotology
    doi:10.1159/000095609PMID 17063006sridhar2006spiralganglion

    Spiral-ganglion frequency-position map relevant to where electrodes actually stimulate neurons.

  • 2006
    Hyde M, Power DSome ethical dimensions of cochlear implantation for deaf children and their familiesJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Documents the need for balanced information and Deaf involvement in counseling.

  • 2006
    Hintermair MParental resources, parental stress, and socioemotional development of deaf and hard of hearing childrenJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Resource-oriented evidence that social networks including Deaf adults lower stress and aid development.

  • 2005
    Cafarelli Dees D, Dillier N, Lai WK, et al.Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant systemAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 10(2):105–116

    Multicentre normative ECAP/NRT dataset.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions

  • 2005
    Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral AThe influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantsHearing Research; 203(1-2):134–143

    Sensitive-period evidence from P1 across unilateral/bilateral implantation.

    Cited in: Overview — the plastic brain, The sensitive period for hearing, Electrical cortical responses

  • 2005
    Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Buchman CA, et al.Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statementOtology & Neurotology; 26(4):815–818

    Consensus definitions for CI device soft failure; objective-measure role in workup.

    Cited in: Choosing a Nucleus Array: Perimodiolar vs Lateral Wall, The Three Array Families: Lateral-Wall, Perimodiolar, Mid-Scala, Overview & rationale, Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2005
    Verschuur CAEffect of stimulation rate on speech perception in adult users of the Med-El CIS speech processing strategyInternational Journal of Audiology; 44(1):58–63

    Speech perception improved 400→800 pps with no further gain to 1500 pps.

    Cited in: Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2005
    Sharma A, Martin K, Roland P, et al.P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairmentJournal of the American Academy of Audiology; 16(8):564–573

    Cortical P1 latency as an objective biomarker of auditory-pathway maturation.

    Cited in: Overview — the plastic brain, The sensitive period for hearing, Electrical cortical responses

  • 2005
    Ryugo DK, Kretzmer EA, Niparko JKRestoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implantsScience; 310(5753):1490–1492

    Cochlear-implant stimulation rescues endbulb-of-Held synapses in congenitally deaf cats.

    Cited in: The deaf brain — auditory deprivation, The implant as environmental input, What stimulation restores — and its limits

  • 2005
    Smith RJ, Bale JF Jr, White KRSensorineural hearing loss in childrenThe Lancet; 365(9462):879–890

    Foundational review: ~1 in 500 newborns, ~70% non-syndromic / 30% syndromic, and the genetic architecture of childhood SNHL.

    Cited in: Overview — genes, deafness & the implant, Syndromic & non-syndromic deafness, Patterns of inheritance, GJB2 & the connexins

  • 2005
    Ryugo DK, Kretzmer EA, Niparko JKRestoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implantsScience; 310(5753):1490–1492

    Landmark evidence that chronic cochlear-implant stimulation can partially restore the degenerated endbulb of Held — the morphological basis of stimulation as rescue.

    Cited in: The deaf brain — auditory deprivation, The implant as environmental input, What stimulation restores — and its limits

  • 2005
    Preminger JE, Carpenter R, Ziegler CHA clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefitJournal of the American Academy of Audiology; 16(8):600–613

    Clinical evidence that cochlear dead regions reduce both measured speech intelligibility and subjective hearing-aid benefit — a hidden reason amplification fails.

    Cited in: Cochlear dead regions

  • 2005
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesNational Coverage Determination 50.3: Cochlear ImplantationCMS Manual System, Pub. 100-103

    The US federal coverage criterion (a best-aided sentence threshold applied to Medicare/Medicaid plans); off-label cases are not reimbursable under it. Cited as a policy anchor; criteria are periodically revised.

  • 2005
    Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MWPreservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processingThe Laryngoscope; 115(5):796–802

    Iowa Hybrid landmark — combined electric-acoustic stimulation with hearing preservation.

    Cited in: Electric-Acoustic Stimulation and Hearing Preservation

  • 2005
    Nogueira W, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Edler BA Psychoacoustic "NofM"-Type Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear ImplantsEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing; 2005(18):3044-3059

    n-of-m / PACE-MP3000 psychoacoustic strategy formulation.

    Cited in: ACE: Spectral Maxima Meet High Rate, The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2005
    Nie K, Stickney G, Zeng FGEncoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noiseIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; 52(1):64-73

    Slowing fine structure to perceivable frequency modulation.

    Cited in: Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling

  • 2005
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Cruz RJEffects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implantsAudiology & Neuro-Otology, 10(3), 169-184; 10(3):169-184

    12 listeners, CIS, 200 to >5000 Hz/electrode; little difference across rates in quiet.

  • 2005
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak LPlace-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L)The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(2), 623-626; 118(2):623-626

    Dual-electrode current steering yields 2-9 discriminable pitches per pair; empirical basis for 120-channel concept.

    Cited in: Virtual Channels: Current Steering and Current Focusing

  • 2005
    Migliaccio AA, Della Santina CC, Carey JP, Niparko JK, Minor LBThe vestibulo-ocular reflex response to head impulses rarely decreases after cochlear implantationOtol Neurotol 2005;26(4):655-660; 26(4):655-660

    ~9% significant loss by head impulse; 40% BVH and 13% asymmetry by head impulse.

    Cited in: Why Implanting the Cochlea Touches Balance, Who Already Has Vestibular Loss: Etiology and Baseline

  • 2005
    Rivas A, Francis HWInner ear abnormalities in a Kcnq1 (Kvlqt1) knockout mouse: a model of Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndromeOtol Neurotol 2005;26(3):415-424; 26(3):415-424

    Jervell-Lange-Nielsen audiovestibular model.

  • 2005
    Welgampola MS, Colebatch JGCharacteristics and clinical applications of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentialsNeurology 2005;64(10):1682-1688; 64(10):1682-1688

    VEMP/saccular testing review.

    Cited in: The Vestibular Audiogram II: VEMP, Otoliths and Function Tests

  • 2005
    Limb CJ, Francis HF, Lustig LR, Niparko JK, Jammal HBenign positional vertigo after cochlear implantationOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132(5):741-745; 132(5):741-745

    ~2% BPPV in first post-op year; up to 10% persistent delayed dizziness.

    Cited in: The Dizzy Patient After Implantation

  • 2005
    Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD, Chinnici J, Bowditch S, Francis HW, Niparko JKPredictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidatesArchives of Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery, 131(12):1049-1054

    Verified, with corrections. Candidate PMID 16365207 was WRONG (resolved to a coronary-bypass microembolization trial); correct PMID is 16365217. Title corrected: 'candidates' not 'Patients'. DOI 10.1001/archotol.131.12.1049 confirmed correct. Volume/issue/pages confirmed (131(12):1049-1054, Dec 2005). Author list expanded to full record.

  • 2005
    Sach TH, Whynes DKPaediatric cochlear implantation: the views of parentsInternational Journal of Audiology, 44(7), 400-407

    Candidate year (2004) was WRONG; correct year is 2005. Volume/issue/pages correct. Confirmed via PMID 16136790 and Crossref DOI 10.1080/14992020500146500.

  • 2005
    Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Stidham K, Roberson JBCochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservationActa Oto-Laryngologica; 125(8):870–876

    Temporal-bone evidence that inferior cochleostomy/round-window entry is least traumatic.

  • 2005
    Spahr AJ, Dorman MFEffects of minimum stimulation settings for the Med El Tempo+ speech processor on speech understandingEar and Hearing; 26(4 Suppl):2S–6S

    Modern strategies deliver soft-sound audibility even with low/estimated thresholds.

  • 2005
    Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB JrIs word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants?The Laryngoscope; 115(4):672-677

    Counted ganglion-cell number did not positively correlate with word scores.

  • 2005
    Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SABenefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implantJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 48(3):668-680

    Bimodal benefit (CI plus contralateral HA) for speech in noise and localization; supports the second-source/redundancy argument in module 1.

  • 2005
    Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Buchman CA, Luxford WM, Pillsbury CH, Roland PS, Shallop JK, Backous DD, Franz D, Graham JM, Hirsch B, Luntz M, Niparko JK, Patrick J, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Tobey EA, Truy E, Staller SCochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statementOtology & Neurotology; 26(4):815-818

    Defined soft failure (suspected malfunction not provable by current in-vivo tests) versus hard failure; framework for evaluating decline/aversive symptoms.

  • 2005
    Izumikawa M, Minoda R, Kawamoto K, Abrashkin KA, Swiderski DL, Dolan DF, Brough DE, Raphael YAuditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammalsNature Medicine; 11(3):271-276

    Landmark: Atoh1 (Math1) gene transfer induced new hair cells and improved thresholds in deafened guinea pigs.

  • 2005
    Papsin BCCochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomyThe Laryngoscope; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26

    Series of 103 children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy; radiologic classification, surgical technique and outcomes; outcomes track surviving neural tissue and nerve status.

  • 2005
    Berrettini S, Forli F, Bogazzi F, Neri E, Salvatori L, Casani AP, Franceschini SSLarge vestibular aqueduct syndrome: audiological, radiological, clinical, and genetic featuresAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology; 26(6):363-71

    Clinical/audiological/genetic phenotype of LVAS, SLC26A4 role, fluctuating progressive loss.

  • 2005
    Olszewski C, Gfeller K, Froman R, Stordahl J, Tomblin BFamiliar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing childrenCochlear Implants International; 6(3):123-140

    Rhythmic cues and lyrics act as compensatory cues; melody recognition improves markedly when rhythm pattern is present.

  • 2005
    Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FGSpeech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearingJournal of the Acoustical Society of America; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-1361

    Residual low-frequency acoustic hearing greatly aids melody recognition; fine structure at low frequencies matters for music.

  • 2005
    Tykocinski M, Cohen LT, Cowan RSMeasurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipientsOtology & Neurotology; 26(5):948-956

    Separates total electrode impedance into access resistance (the perilymph/tissue path) and polarization impedance (the electrode-electrolyte interface); explains why intraoperative impedances are lowest when contacts sit in perilymph and why they rise as tissue organises around the array.

  • 2005
    Roland JT JrA model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion techniqueThe Laryngoscope; 115(8):1325-1339

    Insertion-force model; Contour Advance with Advance Off Stylet gives a more reliable, less traumatic perimodiolar insertion. Foundational atraumatic-technique reference.

  • 2005
    Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, et al.Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present?Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Supplement

    Foundational candidacy and surgical consensus for bone-anchored percutaneous systems.

  • 2005
    Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens ASpectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listenersJ Acoust Soc Am

    Establishes the NH > HI > CI ordering of spectral resolution using ripple stimuli.

  • 2005
    Fu QJ, Nogaki GNoise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearingJ Assoc Res Otolaryngol

    Connects limited effective resolution to the steep drop in CI performance once noise is added.

  • 2005
    Colletti V, Carner M, Miorelli V, Guida M, Colletti L, Fiorino FAuditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and childrenOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    Landmark expansion of ABI indications to non-tumour adults and children.

  • 2005
    Colletti V, Shannon RVOpen set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?Laryngoscope

    Shows non-tumour users can reach open-set speech, unlike most NF2 users.

  • 2005
    Padden C, Humphries TInside Deaf CultureHarvard University Press
    ISBN 9780674022522padden2005insidedeaf

    Accessible account of Deaf culture, language and the Deaf vs deaf distinction.

  • 2005
    Lane HEthnicity, ethics, and the deaf-worldJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

    Provides the Deaf-cultural framing for the selecting-for-deafness arguments.

  • 2005
    Stern RE, Yueh B, Lewis C, Norton S, Sie KCRecent epidemiology of pediatric cochlear implantation in the United States: disparity among children of different ethnicity and socioeconomic statusThe Laryngoscope

    Documents income and ethnicity disparities in US paediatric implantation.

  • 2004
    Vanpoucke FJ, Zarowski AJ, Peeters SAIdentification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurementsIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; 51(12):2174–2183

    Transimpedance/voltage-telemetry modelling of the electrode array.

    Cited in: Impedance & electrode interface

  • 2004
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RVToward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in childrenEar and Hearing; 25(5):447–463

    eABR and ECAP integrated into paediatric level-setting.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, Electrically-evoked ABR, Objective measures → the MAP, Troubleshooting & special cases

  • 2004
    Charasse B, Thai-Van H, Chanal JM, et al.Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural networkArtificial Intelligence in Medicine; 31(3):221–229

    AGF-slope analysis; steeper slope associated with greater neural survival.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions

  • 2004
    Kuhl PKEarly language acquisition: cracking the speech codeNature Reviews Neuroscience; 5(11):831–843

    How early experience tunes the infant brain to its native language.

    Cited in: Critical & sensitive periods, The sensitive period for hearing, The paradox of plasticity

  • 2004
    Gougoux F, Lepore F, Lassonde M, et al.Pitch discrimination in the early blindNature; 430(6997):309

    Early-blind people discriminate pitch better than the sighted — compensatory cross-modal gain.

    Cited in: Cross-modal plasticity

  • 2004
    Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, et alRecognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systemsEar and Hearing; 25(4):375–387

    Shows cochlear-implant recipients achieve open-set speech recognition even at soft input levels — evidence of the wider usable range electrical hearing restores.

    Cited in: When a hearing aid has done all it can, From hearing aid to implant, Audiometric criteria & level

  • 2004
    UK Cochlear Implant Study GroupCriteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults III: prospective evaluation of an actuarial approach to defining a criterionEar and Hearing; 25(4):361–374

    Large national study underpinning the relaxation of candidacy criteria — implant benefit differs little between candidates with no aided discrimination and those scoring up to ~50%.

    Cited in: How the criteria evolved, Audiometric criteria & level, The actuarial odds model, The expanding indications

  • 2004
    Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, et alDevelopment of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 116(4 Pt 1):2395–2405

    QuickSIN — sentences in four-talker babble scored as the signal-to-babble ratio for 50% correct; part of the modern candidacy noise battery (with BKB-SIN).

    Cited in: Speech-in-noise & valid testing, Speech-in-noise & valid testing

  • 2004
    UK Cochlear Implant Study GroupCriteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectivenessEar and Hearing; 25(4):310–335

    The first of the three companion papers — frames candidacy around equivalent effectiveness, the conceptual basis for the actuarial odds model.

    Cited in: The actuarial odds model

  • 2004
    UK Cochlear Implant Study GroupCriteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysisEar and Hearing; 25(4):336–360

    The health-economic companion paper — builds candidacy from a cost-effectiveness analysis, underpinning the access/funding view of selection.

    Cited in: The actuarial odds model, Cost, funding & access

  • 2004
    Dowell RC, Hollow R, Winton EOutcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in childrenArchives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery; 130(5):575–581

    The Melbourne data behind a probabilistic, residual-hearing-tolerant selection rule — candidates with substantial aided scores still have good odds of improvement.

    Cited in: The actuarial odds model

  • 2004
    Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen SEnhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implantsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America; 116(4 Pt 1):2298-2310

    Envelope detection / temporal pitch cues in CIS.

    Cited in: Continuous Interleaved Sampling: The Pulse That Changed Everything

  • 2004
    Zeng FGTrends in cochlear implantsTrends in Amplification; 8(1):1-34

    Rate-pitch saturation ~300 Hz; resolution order-of-magnitude poorer; fine-structure framing.

    Cited in: ACE: Spectral Maxima Meet High Rate, Chasing Fine Structure: FSP, FS4 and the Temporal-Pitch Ceiling, The Present Commercial Landscape: Four Makers, Five Philosophies

  • 2004
  • 2004
    Gatehouse S, Noble WThe Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)International Journal of Audiology, 43(2):85-99; 43(2):85-99

    All candidate metadata matches the verified record.

  • 2004
    Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner WD, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka OHearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulationActa Oto-Laryngologica; 124(4):348–352

    Surgical protocol and outcomes for EAS hearing preservation.

  • 2004
    Peng SC, Spencer LJ, Tomblin JBSpeech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with 7 years of device experienceJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; 47(6):1227-1236

    Speech-production intelligibility in early-implanted children.

  • 2004
    Gatehouse S, Noble WThe Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)International Journal of Audiology; 43(2):85-99

    The SSQ self-report instrument: speech, spatial and qualities domains.

  • 2004
    Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese PHead shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implantEar and Hearing; 25(3):197-204

    Canonical quantification in bilateral CI users: head shadow ~6.8 dB, summation ~2.1 dB, squelch ~0.9 dB (SRT improvements, Oldenburg sentence test). Used for the three-benefit magnitudes in modules 1 and 3.

  • 2004
    Gatehouse S, Noble WThe Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)International Journal of Audiology; 43(2):85-99

    Original 49-item SSQ; three sections (Speech, Spatial, Qualities), 0-10 scoring.

  • 2004
    Ching TYC, Incerti P, Hill MBinaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite earsEar and Hearing; 25(1):9-21

    Landmark bimodal study; low-frequency acoustic cues complement electric high-frequency cues for speech, voice and music.

  • 2004
    James AL, Daniel SJ, Richmond L, Papsin BCSkin breakdown over cochlear implants: prevention of a magnet site complicationJournal of Otolaryngology; 33(3):151-154
    PMID 15841991james2004

    27% of children had at least one episode of magnet-site skin erythema; defines magnet-site skin flap complication and prevention.

  • 2004
    Cunningham CD 3rd, Slattery WH 3rd, Luxford WMPostoperative infection in cochlear implant patientsOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; 131(1):109-114

    Series of CI infections; conservative-first management (antibiotics, debridement) salvages many devices; some require explantation. S. aureus and Pseudomonas prominent.

  • 2004
    Antonelli PJ, Lee JC, Burne RABacterial biofilms may contribute to persistent cochlear implant infectionOtology & Neurotology; 25(6):953-957

    Microorganisms and extracellular biofilm matrix found on surfaces of infected/extruding implants; biofilm explains recalcitrant infection and need for explantation.

  • 2004
    Copeland BJ, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CAProspective evaluation of intraoperative cochlear implant radiographsOtology & Neurotology; 25(3):295-297

    Intraoperative radiography reliably confirms placement and catches malposition before the wound is closed.

  • 2004
    Fayad JN, Baino T, Parisier SCRevision cochlear implant surgery: causes and outcomeOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 131(4):429-432

    Causes of revision surgery and outcomes; performance generally maintained or improved after reimplantation.

  • 2004
    Mylanus EA, Rotteveel LJ, Leeuw RLCongenital Malformation of the Inner Ear and Pediatric Cochlear ImplantationOtology & Neurotology; 25(3):308-317

    Outcomes of CI in malformed ears; membranous/milder bony types do well, neural and severe bony types fare worse. Supports the membranous-implants-well / neural-may-not principle.

  • 2004
    McDermott HJMusic perception with cochlear implants: a reviewTrends in Amplification; 8(2):49-82

    Foundational review of how envelope-based coding shapes music; place vs temporal pitch and channel limits.

  • 2004
    Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FGMusic perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearingEar and Hearing; 25(2):173-185

    Shows rhythm/tempo perception near-normal in CI users while melody collapses when rhythm cues are removed.

  • 2004
    Eggermont JJ, Roberts LEThe neuroscience of tinnitusTrends in Neurosciences; 27(11):676-682

    Central gain / deafferentation model: cochlear damage downregulates intracortical inhibition, producing a phantom sound centrally.

  • 2004
    Quaranta N, Wagstaff S, Baguley DMTinnitus and cochlear implantationInternational Journal of Audiology; 43(5):245-251

    Review collating prevalence and suppression rates: tinnitus in roughly two-thirds to over 80% of severe-profound HL; CI suppresses tinnitus in about 46-86% of recipients.

  • 2004
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann PCochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskersJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Shows implant users lose the talker-segregation and glimpsing advantage normal listeners get from a competing voice.

  • 2004
    Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Miorelli V, Guida M, Colletti LAuditory brainstem implant as a salvage treatment after unsuccessful cochlear implantationOtol Neurotol

    ABI as salvage when a cochlear implant gives no useful perception.

  • 2004
    Kuchta J, Otto SR, Shannon RV, Hitselberger WE, Brackmann DEThe multichannel auditory brainstem implant: how many electrodes make sense?Journal of Neurosurgery

    Analyses how many electrodes contribute usable auditory percepts after programming.

  • 2004
    Christiansen JB, Leigh IWChildren with cochlear implants: changing parent and deaf community perspectivesArchives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery

    Empirical look at how families and the Deaf community navigate the models over time.

  • 2004
    Smits C, Kapteyn TS, Houtgast TDevelopment and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephoneInternational Journal of Audiology

    Connectivity and self-administered testing precedent relevant to phone/wearable integration.

  • 2003
    Cohen LT, Richardson LM, Saunders E, et al.Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward maskingHearing Research; 179(1-2):72–87

    Spread-of-excitation measurement via ECAP and its psychophysical correlate.

    Cited in: Dynamic Range and Electrode-to-Neuron Distance, ECAP threshold & functions

  • 2003
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RVActivity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implantsEar and Hearing; 24(6):485–500

    eABR maturation and brainstem plasticity in implanted children.

    Cited in: Electrically-evoked ABR

  • 2003
    RamShankar M, Girirajan S, Dagan O, et al.Contribution of connexin26 (GJB2) mutations and founder effect to non-syndromic hearing loss in IndiaJournal of Medical Genetics; 40(5):e68

    GJB2 mutations underlie a substantial share of non-syndromic deafness in India, with W24X a founder allele on the subcontinent.

    Cited in: Consanguinity & the genetics of deafness, GJB2 & the connexins

  • 2003
    National Sample Survey Organisation, Government of IndiaDisabled Persons in India — NSS 58th Round (July–December 2002), Report No. 485Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi; Report No. 485 (58/26/1)

    National household survey of disability; hearing was among the most common disabilities, with a large share of severe-to-profound loss in children.

    Cited in: Overview — counting hearing loss, The burden of hearing loss in India

  • 2003
    Eisen MDDjourno, Eyries, and the first implanted electrical neural stimulator to restore hearingOtology & Neurotology; 24(3):500–506

    Detailed historical account of the 1957 Djourno–Eyriès device, the dispute with William House, and the implant's true origin.

    Cited in: Djourno & Eyriès — the 1957 first

  • 2003
    Oxenham AJ, Bacon SPCochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearingEar and Hearing; 24(5):352–366

    Review of cochlear compression and how its loss in sensorineural hearing loss produces recruitment and degraded frequency selectivity.

    Cited in: Recruitment & the narrowed dynamic range, Why recruitment happens, Blurred frequency resolution

  • 2003
    Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JKChoice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performanceOtology & Neurotology; 24(4):582–589

    Evidence that implanting the poorer-hearing ear gives results statistically equivalent to the better ear, informing ear-selection decisions.

    Cited in: Which ear, one or both

  • 2003
    Fina M, Skinner M, Goebel JA, Piccirillo JF, Neely JG, Black OVestibular dysfunction after cochlear implantationOtol Neurotol 2003;24(2):234-242; 24(2):234-42; discussion 242

    23% with >=20% caloric asymmetry; 10-40% delayed dizziness; median onset 74 days; age effect.

    Cited in: The Dizzy Patient After Implantation, Choosing the Ear: Vestibular Risk and Bilateral Implants, Falls and the Older Recipient

  • 2003
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Advisory Committee on Immunization PracticesPneumococcal vaccination for cochlear implant candidates and recipients: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization PracticesMMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52(31):739-740

    PMID 12908457 confirms title/journal/year/volume via Europe PMC. Corrected page range to 739-740 (candidate omitted pages); issue No. 31 (Aug 8, 2003) matches.

  • 2003
    Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Whitney CG, Chamany S, Mann EA, Biernath KR, Broder K, Manning S, Avashia S, Victor M, Costa P, Devine O, Graham A, Boyle CRisk of bacterial meningitis in children with cochlear implantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 349(5):435-445

    PMID 12890842 and DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa031101 both confirm this exact paper via Europe PMC and Crossref. Full author list expanded.

  • 2003
    Hart B, Risley TRThe early catastrophe: the 30 million word gap by age 3American Educator; Spring 2003:4-9
    hartrisley2003

    Quantity of caregiver language input and the cumulative word gap.

  • 2003
    van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RSSpeech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implantsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 113(3):1617-1630

    Bilateral CI users tested on localization and speech in noise; documents preserved ILD/head-shadow use but poor ITD sensitivity. Used in modules 1-3 for the ILD-without-ITD signature.

  • 2003
    Peretz I, Champod AS, Hyde KVarieties of musical disorders. The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of AmusiaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences; 999:58-75

    MBEA: six subtests (scale, contour, interval, rhythm, metric, memory); standard amusia battery later applied to CI users.

  • 2003
    Eshraghi AA, Yang NW, Balkany TJComparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designsThe Laryngoscope; 113(3):415-419

    Source of the widely used Eshraghi 0-4 intracochlear-trauma grading scale (0 none through 4 osseous spiral lamina fracture / scala-vestibuli translocation).

  • 2003
    Parens E, Asch ADisability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendationsMental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

    Updated synthesis of the critique and its replies, used for the counter-arguments.

  • 2003
    Qin MK, Oxenham AJEffects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskersJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Demonstrates the loss of dip-listening (glimpsing) benefit under CI-like processing.

  • 2002
    Dillier N, Lai WK, Almqvist B, et al.Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry systemThe Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology; 111(5 Pt 1):407–414

    Methodological reference for ECAP/NRT acquisition and artifact handling.

    Cited in: ECAP / Neural Response Telemetry

  • 2002
    Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, van Dijk JESpeech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholdsAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 7(6):335–347

    ECAP-threshold-based fitting and resulting speech perception.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2002
    Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus NNeurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measuresEar and Hearing; 23(6):516–531

    Electrically-evoked potentials including eABR vs perception.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, Electrically-evoked ABR

  • 2002
    Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJA sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantationEar and Hearing; 23(6):532–539

    P1 cortical latency as a biomarker of central auditory maturation.

    Cited in: Central auditory pathways, Overview — the plastic brain, Critical & sensitive periods, The sensitive period for hearing, Age at implantation & outcomes, Overview & rationale, Electrical cortical responses

  • 2002
    Holt JR, Gillespie SK, Provance DW, et al.A chemical-genetic strategy implicates myosin-1c in adaptation by hair cellsCell; 108(3):371–381

    Myosin-1c as the hair-cell adaptation motor.

    Cited in: Mechanoelectrical transduction

  • 2002
    Maison SF, Luebke AE, Liberman MC, et al.Efferent protection from acoustic injury is mediated via alpha 9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on outer hair cellsJournal of Neuroscience; 22(24):10838–10846

    The medial olivocochlear reflex protects against noise via α9 nAChRs on outer hair cells.

    Cited in: The cochlear amplifier

  • 2002
    Kenneson A, Van Naarden Braun K, Boyle CGJB2 (connexin 26) variants and nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss: a HuGE reviewGenetics in Medicine; 4(4):258–274

    GJB2/Connexin-26 accounts for up to ~50% of non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss in some populations.

    Cited in: Overview — the hearing pathway

  • 2002
    Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJA sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantationEar and Hearing; 23(6):532–539

    The ~3.5-year sensitive period for central auditory development, from the cortical P1 response.

    Cited in: Central auditory pathways, Overview — the plastic brain, Critical & sensitive periods, The sensitive period for hearing, Age at implantation & outcomes, Overview & rationale, Electrical cortical responses

  • 2002
    Green GE, Scott DA, McDonald JM, et al.Performance of cochlear implant recipients with GJB2-related deafnessAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics; 109(3):167–170

    GJB2/connexin-26 recipients perform at least as well as other implantees — the cochlear lesion spares the neural target.

    Cited in: GJB2 & the connexins, Genotype-specific CI outcomes

  • 2002
    Sennaroglu L, Saatci IA new classification for cochleovestibular malformationsThe Laryngoscope; 112(12):2230–2241

    The worldwide-accepted classification — complete labyrinthine aplasia, cochlear aplasia/hypoplasia, common cavity, incomplete partition I–III and EVA — that drives candidacy, electrode choice and gusher risk.

    Cited in: Special Arrays for the Difficult Cochlea

  • 2002
    Välimaa TSpeech perception and auditory performance in hearing-impaired adults with a multichannel cochlear implantPhD Thesis, University of Oulu (Acta Universitatis Ouluensis D); PhD dissertation
    valimaa2002

    Cited for >800 pps per-channel CIS rate (grey source).

    Cited in: Continuous Interleaved Sampling: The Pulse That Changed Everything

  • 2002
    Ciocca V, Francis AL, Aisha R, Wong LThe perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implanteesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 111(5 Pt 1):2250-2256

    SPEAK 6-10 electrodes / ~250 pps; tone perception.

  • 2002
    Skinner MW, Holden LK, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Psarros C, Holden TASpeech recognition with the Nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adultsEar and Hearing; 23(3):207-223

    ACE comparable to CIS/SPEAK in newly implanted adults.

  • 2002
    Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Vincenti V, Guida M, Berghenti MT, Barbot A, Panu F, Bacciu SComparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipientsInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 64(2), 159-163; 64(2):159-163

    Pediatric SPEAK vs ACE (n=9): words quiet 68.8%->91%, words +10 dB SNR 43.3%->84.4%.

    Cited in: ACE: Spectral Maxima Meet High Rate

  • 2002
    Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA, Demorest MEEffects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategyEar and Hearing, 23(5), 463-476; 23(5):463-476

    720 vs 1800 pps/ch ACE (n=7); no conclusive group benefit of the higher rate.

    Cited in: ACE: Spectral Maxima Meet High Rate

  • 2002
    Zeng FGTemporal pitch in electric hearingHearing Research, 174(1-2), 101-106; 174(1-2):101-106

    Canonical ~300 Hz upper limit of temporal/rate pitch; NH FDL 2-3 Hz below 500 Hz vs CI FDL ~100 Hz.

    Cited in: The Frontier: Deep Learning, Closed Loops and Light

  • 2002
    Tamagawa Y, Ishikawa K, Ishikawa K, Ishida T, Kitamura K, Makino S, Tsuru T, Ichimura KPhenotype of DFNA11: a nonsyndromic hearing loss caused by a myosin VIIA mutationLaryngoscope 2002;112(2):292-297; 112(2):292-297

    Usher type IB / DFNA11 audiovestibular association.

    Cited in: Who Already Has Vestibular Loss: Etiology and Baseline

  • 2002
    Phillips JO, Backous DDEvaluation of vestibular function in young childrenOtolaryngol Clin North Am 2002;35(4):765-790; 35(4):765-790

    Pediatric vestibular testing; children preferring rotary chair over calorics.

    Cited in: The Vestibular Audiogram I: Canal Tests Across Frequency, The Child's Balance and Motor Development

  • 2002
    Tien HC, Linthicum FH JrHistopathologic changes in the vestibule after cochlear implantationOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127(4):260-264; 127(4):260-264

    Temporal-bone study; 72% vestibular end-organ damage, mostly saccule.

    Cited in: Why Implanting the Cochlea Touches Balance, How Implant Surgery Injures the Labyrinth, The Vestibular Audiogram II: VEMP, Otoliths and Function Tests

  • 2002
    Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KEA cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantationArchives of Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery, 128(11), 1255-1262

    Candidate year 2010 was wrong; title/authors/journal match the real 2002 paper exactly (PMID 12431166). Corrected year to 2002.

  • 2002
    Chorbachi R, Graham JM, Ford J, Raine CHCochlear implantation in Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndromeInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology; 66(3):213–221

    Long-QT deafness syndrome and the case for routine preoperative ECG screening.

  • 2002
    Häusler RCochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion techniqueActa Oto-Laryngologica; 122(7):715–719

    Mastoidectomy-sparing pericanal (endomeatal) electrode insertion.

  • 2002
    Kiratzidis T, Iliades T, Arnold WVeria operation. II. Surgical results from 101 casesORL; Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties; 64(6):413–416

    The Veria operation: transcanal tunnel technique, 101-case results.

  • 2002
    Muller J, Schon F, Helms JSpeech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant systemEar and Hearing; 23(3):198-206

    Nine bilateral CI users; ~31 percentage-point sentence-in-noise benefit (head shadow) and ~19-point word benefit. Source of the classic Niparko Fig 7-13 results; used in module 3.

  • 2002
    Glastonbury CM, Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR, Butler J, Kertesz TR, Shelton CImaging findings of cochlear nerve deficiencyAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology; 23(4):635-43
    PMID 11950658glastonbury2002

    Direct MRI assessment of the cochlear nerve in the IAC via parasagittal oblique reformats; four-nerve depiction.

  • 2002
    Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, Witt S, Stordahl JRecognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adultsCochlear Implants International; 3(1):29-53

    49 CI recipients vs 18 normal-hearing adults; NH significantly more accurate at familiar-melody recognition without rhythm or lyric cues.

  • 2002
    Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson JEffects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 111(4):349-356

    CI recipients significantly less accurate than NH at instrument-timbre recognition; worst for high-frequency-range instruments and the string family; poorer appraisal ratings.

  • 2002
    Fu QJTemporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant usersNeuroReport

    Links modulation-detection thresholds to speech-recognition performance.

  • 2002
    Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Long CJ, Deeks JM, Wouters JTemporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearingJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Interpulse-interval data showing pitch is read from intervals between successive pulses.

  • 2002
    Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Oxenham AJChimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perceptionNature

    Landmark envelope-versus-fine-structure swap showing fine structure dominates pitch and listening in fluctuating noise.

  • 2002
    Shannon RV, Galvin JJ, Baskent DHoles in hearingJARO

    Shows how dead regions and lost channels punch holes in the spectrum, compounding noise difficulty.

  • 2002
    Nevison B, Laszig R, Sollmann WP, Lenarz T, Sterkers O, Ramsden R, et al.Results from a European clinical investigation of the Nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem implantEar and Hearing

    Foundational multicentre ABI series establishing intraoperative testing and outcome norms.

  • 2002
    Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, Shannon RV, Kuchta JMultichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patientsJournal of Neurosurgery

    Reports the proportion of electrodes lost to non-auditory effects in a large ABI series.

  • 2002
    Colletti V, Fiorino F, Carner M, Sacchetto L, Miorelli V, Orsi AAuditory brainstem implantation: the University of Verona experienceOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    Verona series that championed the retrosigmoid approach for ABI.

  • 2002
    Colletti V, Carner M, Fiorino F, et al.Hearing restoration with auditory brainstem implant in three children with cochlear nerve aplasiaOtology & Neurotology

    Early demonstration that children with no cochlear nerve can gain hearing from an ABI.

  • 2002
    Levy NDeafness, culture, and choiceJournal of Medical Ethics

    Analyzes choice and open-future considerations relevant to shared decisions.

  • 2001
    Shepherd RK, Hardie NADeafness-induced changes in the auditory pathway: implications for cochlear implantsAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 6(6):305–318

    Key review of how deafness alters the peripheral and central auditory pathway and what it means for cochlear implantation — a backbone source for this chapter.

    Cited in: Hair-cell loss & deafferentation, Spiral ganglion neuron degeneration, The cochlear nucleus & the endbulb, Stimulation as a trophic signal, Protecting & rebuilding the substrate, From cause to candidacy

  • 2001
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, et alSpeech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implantsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 110(2):1150–1163

    Shows implant users plateau at ~7–8 effective channels (and fewer in noise) however many electrodes are active — the functional ceiling set by channel interaction.

    Cited in: Channel interaction & current spread, Front-end pre-processing, Why 22 Electrodes Behave Like 8 Channels, The Lineage at a Glance: Why Coding Strategies Keep Changing

  • 2001
    Vickers DA, Moore BCJ, Baer TEffects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequenciesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 110(2):1164–1175

    Demonstrates that amplifying frequencies that fall in a cochlear dead region does not help — and can hurt — speech intelligibility.

    Cited in: Cochlear dead regions

  • 2001
    Kiefer J, Hohl S, Sturzebecher E, Pfennigdorff T, Gstoettner WComparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the Nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant systemInternational Journal of Audiology; 40(1):32-42

    SPEAK vs CIS vs ACE comparison.

    Cited in: The n-of-m Family: SPEAK and the Rise of Peak Picking, ACE: Spectral Maxima Meet High Rate

  • 2001
    Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, Grote JJThe importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implantsOtology & Neurotology; 22(3):340-349

    Clarion CII / HiRes implementation and rate/channel context.

    Cited in: Virtual Channels: Current Steering and Current Focusing

  • 2001
    Sando I, Orita Y, Miura M, Balaban CDVestibular abnormalities in congenital disordersAnn N Y Acad Sci 2001;942:15-24; 942:15-24

    Syndromic congenital vestibular abnormalities.

  • 2001
    Ramat S, Zee DS, Minor LBTranslational vestibulo-ocular reflex evoked by a head heave stimulusAnn N Y Acad Sci 2001;942:95-113; 942:95-113

    Head-heave test of utricular (translational VOR) function.

    Cited in: The Vestibular Audiogram II: VEMP, Otoliths and Function Tests

  • 2001
    Steenerson RL, Cronin GW, Gary LBVertigo after cochlear implantationOtol Neurotol 2001;22(6):842-843; 22(6):842-843

    Post-CI vertigo case data.

    Cited in: The Dizzy Patient After Implantation

  • 2001
    Rabin R, de Charro FEQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol GroupAnnals of Medicine, 33(5):337-343

    Confirmed via Crossref. Author corrected: 'de Charro R' -> 'de Charro F' (Frank de Charro). Crossref renders title as 'EQ-SD' (OCR artifact); correct title is EQ-5D.

  • 2001
    Ruckenstein MJ, Rafter KO, Montes M, Bigelow DCManagement of far advanced otosclerosis in the era of cochlear implantationOtology & Neurotology, 22(4):471-474

    Title/authors/year/volume/issue/pages all confirmed via Europe PMC and Crossref.

  • 2001
    Alexiades G, Roland JT, Fishman AJ, et al.Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional resultsThe Laryngoscope; 111(9):1608–1613

    Reimplantation technique and equal-or-better functional outcomes.

  • 2001
    Stelmachowicz PG, Pittman AL, Hoover BM, Lewis DEEffect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adultsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 110(4):2183–2190

    Bandwidth and high-frequency audibility for speech, basis for wider paediatric maps.

  • 2001
    Hughes ML, Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Kelsay DM, Teagle HF, Lowder MWA longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant usersEar and Hearing; 22(6):471-486

    Tracks impedance and ECAP over time in adults and children; baseline for interpreting drift versus a fault.

  • 2001
    Robles L, Ruggero MAMechanics of the mammalian cochleaPhysiological Reviews

    Authoritative review of cochlear amplification, compression and tuning.

  • 2001
    Colletti V, Fiorino F, Sacchetto L, Miorelli V, Carner MHearing habilitation with auditory brainstem implantation in two children with cochlear nerve aplasiaInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol

    Early report establishing ABI in children with cochlear nerve aplasia.

  • 2001
    Nunes REthical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantationTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics

    Ties outcome uncertainty and quality of life to the surrogate-consent standard.

  • 2000
    Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Brown CJAn improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potentialEar and Hearing; 21(4):280–290

    Forward-masking subtraction for ECAP artifact rejection.

    Cited in: ECAP / Neural Response Telemetry

  • 2000
    Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, et al.Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from childrenEar and Hearing; 21(2):164–174

    Relationship between ECAP threshold and behavioural MAP levels in children.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions, Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2000
    Stephan K, Welzl-Müller KPost-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implantsAudiology; 39(1):13–18

    ESRT and loudness scaling relationship in CI recipients.

    Cited in: Electrical stapedius reflex

  • 2000
    Broomfield S, Mawman D, Woolford TJ, et al.Non-auditory stimulation in adult cochlear implant usersCochlear Implants International; 1(1):55–66

    Non-auditory and vibrotactile percepts in CI users.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 2000
    Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, et al.Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant systemEar and Hearing; 21(6):608–624

    Speech recognition decreased and sound quality worsened at the faster rate in some users.

    Cited in: ACE: Spectral Maxima Meet High Rate, Manufacturer systems compared

  • 2000
    Zheng J, Shen W, He DZ, et al.Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cellsNature; 405(6783):149–155

    Identification of prestin as the OHC somatic motor.

    Cited in: The cochlear amplifier

  • 2000
    Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Goodyear RJ, et al.A targeted deletion in alpha-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedbackNeuron; 28(1):273–285

    Tectorin mutation shows the tectorial membrane tunes cochlear amplification.

    Cited in: Organ of Corti & hair cells

  • 2000
    Forge A, Schacht JAminoglycoside antibioticsAudiology & Neuro-Otology; 5(1):3–22

    Review of the mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity — outer-hair-cell death from the base upward, and the basis for high-frequency-first, often irreversible loss.

    Cited in: Ototoxicity — drugs that damage the ear

  • 2000
    Pisoni DBCognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perceptionEar and Hearing; 21(1):70–78

    Argues that working memory and information-processing — not general IQ — underlie the unexplained 'X factor' in cochlear-implant outcome.

    Cited in: Predicting the outcome

  • 2000
    Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, et alCost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in childrenJAMA; 284(7):850–856

    Demonstrates favourable cost-utility for paediatric implantation — the health-economic argument that supports funding and access.

    Cited in: Cost, funding & access

  • 2000
    Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van den Broek PDevelopment and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant QuestionnaireOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 123(6):756–765

    The NCIQ — a validated quality-of-life instrument that belongs in the pre-operative work-up as candidacy data, not only as an outcome measure.

    Cited in: Self-report & functional outcomes, Psychosocial assessment & expectations

  • 2000
    O'Shaughnessy DSpeech Communications: Human and Machine, 2nd ed.Universities Press (IEEE Press); 2nd ed.
    oshaughnessy2000

    Formant/F0/F1/F2 definitions (grey/book source).

    Cited in: Tracking the Voice: F0/F2 Formant Extraction, Adding F1: The F0/F1/F2 Processor

  • 2000
    Osberger MJ, Fisher LNew directions in speech processing: patient performance with simultaneous analog stimulationAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement; 185:70-73
    PMID 11141014osberger2000

    SAS strategy and SAS-vs-CIS preference data.

  • 2000
    Gong W, Merfeld DMPrototype neural semicircular canal prosthesis using patterned electrical stimulationAnn Biomed Eng 2000;28(5):572-581; 28(5):572-581

    First vestibular implant prototype; partial VOR restoration.

    Cited in: The Vestibular and Cochleovestibular Implant Frontier

  • 2000
    O'Neill C, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold SM, Normand CA cost-utility analysis of pediatric cochlear implantationLaryngoscope. 2000;110(1):156-160

    Confirmed via Europe PMC (EXT_ID:10646733). Author list completed (Normand C added vs candidate 'et al.'; O'Donoghue initials GM); title, journal, year, volume, issue, pages all match.

  • 2000
    Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJChallenges in the Clinical Investigation of Cochlear Implant OutcomesIn: Niparko JK, Kirk KI, Mellon NK, Robbins AM, Tucci DL, Wilson BS (eds.), Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 225-259
    kirk2000

    Confirmed as a genuine chapter in Niparko's Cochlear Implants: Principles & Practices (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000), pp. 225-259. Book chapters lack a PMID/DOI; verified via bibliographic search.

  • 2000
    Hinderink JB, Krabbe PFM, Van Den Broek PDevelopment and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant QuestionnaireOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; 123(6):756-765

    The NCIQ CI-specific self-report instrument.

  • 2000
    Moeller MPEarly intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearingPediatrics; 106(3):E43

    Family involvement as a leading predictor of language outcome.

  • 2000
    Hyde M, Power DInformed parental consent for cochlear implantation of young deaf children: social and other considerations in the use of the bionic earAustralian Journal of Social Issues
    PMID 14627014hyde2000consent

    Focused analysis of what informed parental consent should encompass.

  • 1999
    Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, et al.Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potentialEar and Hearing; 20(1):45–59

    Introduces Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) on the Nucleus device.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, ECAP / Neural Response Telemetry, ECAP threshold & functions, Manufacturer systems compared

  • 1999
    Klinke R, Kral A, Heid S, et al.Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulationScience; 285(5434):1729–1733

    Chronic implant use expands active auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats.

    Cited in: The implant as environmental input

  • 1999
    Leake PA, Hradek GT, Snyder RLChronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafnessThe Journal of Comparative Neurology; 412(4):543–562

    Shows that chronic electrical stimulation promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness — the trophic effect of the implant on its own target.

    Cited in: Spiral ganglion neuron degeneration, Stimulation as a trophic signal

  • 1999
    American National Standards InstituteANSI S3.1: Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test RoomsAmerican National Standards Institute (R2018)
    ansiS31

    The booth/ambient-noise standard underlying valid threshold and soundfield testing; cited for calibration and test-environment requirements.

  • 1999
    Loizou PCIntroduction to cochlear implantsIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine; 18(1):32-42

    Introductory/historical overview of CI fundamentals.

    Cited in: The Lineage at a Glance: Why Coding Strategies Keep Changing, One Electrode, One Sound: The Single-Channel Era, Tracking the Voice: F0/F2 Formant Extraction

  • 1999
    Spelman FAThe past, present, and future of cochlear prosthesesIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine; 18(3):27-33

    Source of general CI block diagram and past/present/future framing.

  • 1999
    Loizou PCSignal-processing techniques for cochlear implantsIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine; 18(3):34-46

    Key review for CA, CIS, pulse-rate facts.

    Cited in: Compressed Analog: The First Multichannel Waveform Strategy, Continuous Interleaved Sampling: The Pulse That Changed Everything, Adding F1: The F0/F1/F2 Processor

  • 1999
    Skinner MW, Fourakis MS, Holden TA, Holden LK, Demorest MEIdentification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. II. ConsonantsEar and Hearing, 20(6), 443-460; 20(6):443-460

    MPEAK vs SPEAK consonants 67.5% vs 76.2% (n=9, p<0.001 favoring SPEAK; more place info).

    Cited in: Multipeak (MPEAK): Formants Plus High-Frequency Bands

  • 1999
    Wiener-Vacher SR, Amanou L, Denise P, Narcy P, Manach YVestibular function in children with the CHARGE associationArch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125(3):342-347; 125(3):342-347

    CHARGE canal aplasia with intact otoliths; basis for VEMP-guided ear selection and milestone clues.

  • 1999
    Cheng AK, Niparko JKCost-utility of the cochlear implant in adults: a meta-analysisArchives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 125(11), 1214-1218

    Confirmed via PMID 10555692 / Europe PMC. Candidate title was a paraphrase (corrected to actual title). Spurious third author 'Kohman ML' REMOVED — paper has only two authors, Cheng AK and Niparko JK.

  • 1999
    Palmer CS, Niparko JK, Wyatt JR, Rothman M, de Lissovoy GA prospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implantArchives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 125(11):1221-1228

    Confirmed via Europe PMC (EXT_ID:10555693). Author list completed to add Rothman M and de Lissovoy G.

  • 1999
    Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CAThe PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventoryMedical Care, 37(2):126-139; 37(2):126-139

    Verified via Europe PMC (PMID 10024117). Candidate metadata was WRONG: it listed 'Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(3):233-248'; the PedsQL measurement-model paper was actually published in Medical Care 37(2):126-139. Corrected to match the confirmed record.

  • 1999
    Telian SA, El-Kashlan HK, Arts HAMinimizing wound complications in cochlear implant surgeryThe American Journal of Otology; 20(3):331–334
    PMID 10337973telian1999

    Incision and flap principles to reduce wound/flap complications.

  • 1999
    Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJResidual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteriaThe American Journal of Otology; 20(4):445-452
    PMID 10431885rubinstein1999

    Duration of deafness + preoperative aided sentence scores as strong single-centre predictors.

  • 1999
    Parens E, Asch AThe disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Reflections and recommendationsHastings Center Report

    Foundational statement of the expressivist objection and the disability-rights critique of selecting against traits.

  • 1998
    Knudsen EICapacity for plasticity in the adult owl auditory system expanded by juvenile experienceScience; 279(5356):1531–1533

    Juvenile experience leaves a latent trace that widens adult plasticity (barn owl).

    Cited in: The paradox of plasticity

  • 1998
    Lessard N, Paré M, Lepore F, et al.Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjectsNature; 395(6699):278–280

    Sensory deprivation sharpens the spared senses — compensatory plasticity.

    Cited in: Cross-modal plasticity

  • 1998
    Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, et al.Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing lossPediatrics; 102(5):1161–1171
    doi:10.1542/peds.102.5.1161PMID 9794949Evidence 2byoshinagaitano1998

    Children identified by ~6 months have markedly better language than those identified later.

    Cited in: Age at implantation & outcomes, Newborn & infant hearing screening

  • 1998
    Loizou PCMimicking the human earIEEE Signal Processing Magazine; 15(5):101–130

    Classic tutorial on cochlear-implant sound processing — the signal path from microphone through filter bank and envelope detection to pulsatile stimulation.

    Cited in: The processor's signal path, The Lineage at a Glance: Why Coding Strategies Keep Changing, The n-of-m Family: SPEAK and the Rise of Peak Picking

  • 1998
    Knutson JF, Murray KT, Husarek S, et alPsychological change over 54 months of cochlear implant useEar and Hearing; 19(3):191–201

    Documents the depressive and social difficulties common in implant candidates and the long-term psychological benefit of implantation — the basis for psychosocial assessment.

    Cited in: Psychosocial assessment & expectations, Counselling, ethics & consent

  • 1998
    Cremer PD, Halmagyi GM, Aw ST, Curthoys IS, McGarvie LA, Todd MJ, Black RA, Hannigan IPSemicircular canal plane head impulses detect absent function of individual semicircular canalsBrain 1998;121(Pt 4):699-716; 121(Pt 4):699-716

    Plane-specific head-impulse testing of individual canals with scleral coils.

    Cited in: The Vestibular Audiogram I: Canal Tests Across Frequency

  • 1998
    Archbold S, Lutman ME, Nikolopoulos TCategories of auditory performance: inter-user reliabilityBritish Journal of Audiology; 32(1):7-12

    Reliability of the CAP global outcome ladder.

  • 1998
    Otto SR, Shannon RV, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, Staller S, Menapace CThe multichannel auditory brain stem implant: performance in twenty patientsOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    Early multichannel ABI device and performance, establishing the surface-array platform.

  • 1998
    Lane H, Bahan BEthics of cochlear implantation in young children: a review and reply from a Deaf-World perspectiveOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

    Foundational articulation of the cultural-Deaf critique of pediatric implantation.

  • 1997
    Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Ruth RA, et al.Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programmingOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 117(3 Pt 1):255–261

    ESRT as an objective anchor for comfortable-level (C/M) programming.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, Electrical stapedius reflex, Objective measures → the MAP

  • 1997
    Cohen LG, Celnik P, Pascual-Leone A, et al.Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humansNature; 389(6647):180–183

    Disrupting visual cortex impairs Braille reading — cross-modal takeover is functional.

    Cited in: Cross-modal plasticity

  • 1997
    Ryugo DK, Pongstaporn T, Huchton DM, et alUltrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: morphologic alterations in endbulbs of HeldThe Journal of Comparative Neurology; 385(2):230–244

    Demonstrates degeneration of the endbulb of Held — the large auditory-nerve synapse onto the cochlear nucleus — in congenitally deaf cats.

    Cited in: The cochlear nucleus & the endbulb

  • 1997
    Nadol JB JrPatterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantationOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 117(3):220–228

    Human temporal-bone analysis of spiral ganglion and auditory-nerve degeneration by cause of deafness — the clinical counterpart to the animal work.

    Cited in: Spiral ganglion neuron degeneration, The nerve & the electrode, Overview — why the cause matters, What the temporal bone reveals, From cause to candidacy

  • 1997
    Ay SU, Zeng FG, Sheu BJHearing with bionic ears [cochlear implant devices]IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine; 13(3):18-23

    Cited for the 3M/House single-channel device.

    Cited in: One Electrode, One Sound: The Single-Channel Era

  • 1997
    Fishman KE, Shannon RV, Slattery WHSpeech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processorJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(5), 1201-1215; 40(5):1201-1215

    Primary channel-plateau source; asymptotes at ~4 (sentences), 5 (consonants), 8 (vowels/words).

  • 1997
    McElveen JT Jr, Carrasco VN, Miyamoto RT, Linthicum FH JrCochlear implantation in common cavity malformations using a transmastoid labyrinthotomy approachThe Laryngoscope; 107(8):1032-1036

    Describes the transmastoid labyrinthotomy approach for common cavity; direct lateral access avoids the facial recess and an aberrant facial nerve; gusher managed with tight cochleostomy seal.

  • 1997
    Cohen NLCochlear implant soft surgery: fact or fantasy?Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; 117(3 Pt 1):214-216

    Early critical appraisal of the soft-surgery concept.

  • 1997
    Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Recio A, Narayan SS, Robles LBasilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochleaJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Classic demonstration of compressive, sharply tuned BM responses near CF.

  • 1997
    Collins LM, Zwolan TA, Wakefield GHComparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Shows place-pitch tasks are imperfect, uneven along the array, and do not always agree.

  • 1997
    Crouch RALetting the deaf be Deaf. Reconsidering the use of cochlear implants in prelingually deaf childrenHastings Center Report
    doi:10.2307/3528774PMID 9271717crouch1997lettingdeaf

    Bioethics argument that the cultural option deserves equal standing in decisions.

  • 1997
    Lane H, Grodin MEthical issues in cochlear implant surgery: an exploration into disease, disability, and the best interests of the childKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

    Examines how best interests is contested between medical and cultural frames.

  • 1997
    Davis DSCochlear implants and the claims of culture? A response to Lane and GrodinKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

    Defends parental latitude while engaging cultural claims, informing the discretion analysis.

  • 1997
    Davis DSGenetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open futureHastings Center Report

    Applies Feinberg to deaf children and reframes the tension as parental versus future-child autonomy.

  • 1996
    Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Borland J, Bertschy MRElectrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responsesJournal of Speech and Hearing Research; 39(3):453–467

    ECAP vs psychophysical responses across electrode configurations.

    Cited in: ECAP threshold & functions

  • 1996
    Starr A, Picton TW, Sininger Y, et alAuditory neuropathyBrain; 119(Pt 3):741–753

    Defining description of auditory neuropathy — present OAEs/cochlear microphonic with an absent or grossly abnormal ABR — the signature the OAE–ABR cross-check is built to catch.

    Cited in: Otoacoustic emissions

  • 1996
    Skinner MW, Fourakis MS, Holden TA, Holden LK, Demorest MEIdentification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. VowelsEar and Hearing, 17(3), 182-197; 17(3):182-197

    MPEAK vs SPEAK vowels 72.3% vs 73.4% (n=9, NS); SPEAK assigns fewer electrodes to F1.

    Cited in: The n-of-m Family: SPEAK and the Rise of Peak Picking

  • 1996
    Feeny D, Torrance GW, Furlong WHealth utilities indexIn: Spilker B, editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; p. 239-252

    Book chapter in a genuine textbook with confirmed ISBN 0-7817-0332-8 (9780781703321), Lippincott-Raven Press, 1996. Candidate publisher 'Lippincott Williams & Wilkins/Baltimore' corrected to 'Lippincott-Raven/Philadelphia'.

  • 1996
    Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GGMeasuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapyAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 105(6):415-422; 105(6):415-422

    Chapter 18 reference (robinson1996).

  • 1996
    Wyatt JR, Niparko JK, Rothman M, deLissovoy GCost utility of the multichannel cochlear implants in 258 profoundly deaf individualsThe Laryngoscope, 106(7):816-821

    Confirmed via Europe PMC (EXT_ID:8667975). Verified title is plural 'implants'; issue 7 added; 4th author deLissovoy G appended.

  • 1996
    Balkany T, Gantz BJ, Steenerson RL, Cohen NLSystematic approach to electrode insertion in the ossified cochleaOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 114(1):4–11

    Graded surgical algorithm for the ossified cochlea.

  • 1996
    Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JBDevelopment of the Tinnitus Handicap InventoryArchives of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery; 122(2):143-148

    The 25-item Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the most widely used tinnitus-handicap questionnaire; scored 0-100.

  • 1996
    Pfingst BE, Holloway LA, Razzaque SAEffects of pulse separation on detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the human cochleaHearing Research

    Shows how pulse timing parameters affect electric detection thresholds.

  • 1996
    Balkany T, Hodges AV, Goodman KWEthics of cochlear implantation in young childrenOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

    Surgeons' open-future defence of paediatric implantation.

  • 1995
    Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA, et al.Comparison of procedures for obtaining thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels with the Nucleus cochlear implant systemJournal of Speech and Hearing Research; 38(3):677–689

    Behavioural T-level procedures (count-the-beeps, loudness scaling) and low-level access.

    Cited in: Objective measures → the MAP

  • 1995
    NIH Consensus Development PanelNIH consensus conference. Cochlear implants in adults and childrenJAMA; 274(24):1955–1961

    The 1995 NIH consensus statement (following the 1988 conference) endorsing cochlear implantation in adults and children — a turning point from experiment to accepted therapy.

    Cited in: FDA approval & the 1988 NIH consensus

  • 1995
    Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, et alSpeech recognition with primarily temporal cuesScience; 270(5234):303–304

    Landmark noise-vocoder study showing speech can be understood from the temporal envelope in as few as four spectral bands — the conceptual basis for envelope-based coding.

    Cited in: What normal hearing does, Envelope, fine structure & the vocoder

  • 1995
    Wilson IB, Cleary PDLinking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomesJAMA; 273(1):59–65

    The biopsychosocial outcomes model behind the ICF-style approach to candidacy — selection must weigh environment and personal factors, not body-function audiometry alone.

    Cited in: Psychosocial assessment & expectations, The team decision

  • 1995
    Seligman P, McDermott HArchitecture of the Spectra 22 speech processorAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement; 166:139-141
    PMID 7668606seligman1995

    SPEAK implementation in the Nucleus Spectra 22; SPEAK/ACE peak-selection origin.

    Cited in: The n-of-m Family: SPEAK and the Rise of Peak Picking

  • 1995
    Baloh RWApproach to the evaluation of the dizzy patientOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;112(1):3-7; 112(1):3-7

    General dizzy-patient evaluation framework.

    Cited in: Reading the Dizzy History and the Five-Minute Screen

  • 1995
    Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DHCategories of Auditory PerformanceAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Supplement, 166, 312-314
    PMID 7668685archbold1995

    Candidate year (2004) and source (Ear & Hearing 16(3):312-324) were both WRONG. Confirmed via PMID 7668685 / Europe PMC: this is the 1995 CAP paper in Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:312-314. Corrected.

  • 1995
    Moog JS, Biedenstein JJ, Davidson LS (Central Institute for the Deaf)SPICE: Speech Perception Instructional Curriculum and EvaluationCentral Institute for the Deaf (CID), St. Louis, MO; curriculum materials (2nd ed. 2007)

    Verified as a genuine published CID curriculum via WorldCat (OCLC 38266458). It is a curriculum product, not a journal article, so no DOI/PMID applies. Authors are Jean S. Moog, Julia J. Biedenstein, and Lisa S. Davidson. Original SPICE published 1995; SPICE 2nd ed published 2007 — candidate's '2024' year is not accurate for the underlying curriculum, but the resource itself is real.

  • 1995
    Cox RM, Alexander GCThe abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefitEar and Hearing, 16(2):176-186; 16(2):176-186

    Chapter 18 reference (cox1995).

  • 1995
    Harris JP, Anderson JP, Novak RAn outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients. Audiologic, economic, and quality-of-life changesArchives of Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery, 121(4), 398-404; 121(4):398-404

    Candidate title ('Quality of well-being scale utility assessment in cochlear implant recipients') and journal (Laryngoscope) were inaccurate. The real 1995 Harris cohort study on utility/QoL changes after CI is in Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, confirmed via Europe PMC PMID:7702813 and Crossref DOI. Title and source corrected.

  • 1995
    Summerfield AQ, Marshall DHCochlear Implantation in the UK 1990-1994: Report by the MRC Institute of Hearing Research on the Evaluation of the National Cochlear Implant ProgrammeLondon: HMSO
    ISBN 9780113219308summerfield1995

    Candidate year (2001) was WRONG; the HMSO report was published 1995. Genuine government publication confirmed via WorldCat/library catalogues with ISBN 9780113219308 (main report). No PMID/DOI (not a journal article); verified on real ISBN.

  • 1995
    Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA, Demorest MEComparison of procedures for obtaining thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant systemJournal of Speech and Hearing Research; 38(3):677–689

    Count-the-beeps and loudness-scaling procedures for setting CI levels.

  • 1995
    Cox RM, Alexander GCThe abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefitEar and Hearing; 16(2):176-186

    APHAB self-report benefit questionnaire (four subscales).

  • 1995
    Kuroki A, Moller ARMicrosurgical anatomy around the foramen of Luschka in relation to intraoperative recording of auditory evoked potentials from the cochlear nucleiJournal of Neurosurgery

    Detailed microanatomy of the foramen of Luschka and cochlear nuclei relevant to placement.

  • 1994
    Spivak LG, Chute PMThe relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patientsEar and Hearing; 15(2):184–192

    ESRT vs behavioural comfort levels across ages.

    Cited in: Electrical stapedius reflex

  • 1994
    Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, et al.Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implantsArchives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery; 120(10):1083–1090

    Pediatric eABR; little latency change with stimulus level.

    Cited in: Electrically-evoked ABR

  • 1994
    Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JADevelopment of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 95(2):1085–1099

    The HINT — an adaptive sentence-in-noise test; an early standard for the speech-in-noise side of cochlear-implant candidacy before ceiling effects shifted practice toward AzBio.

    Cited in: Speech-in-noise & valid testing, Speech-in-noise & valid testing

  • 1994
    Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA, et alEvaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant SystemThe American Journal of Otology; 15 Suppl 2:15-27
    PMID 8572106skinner1994

    SPEAK primary description.

    Cited in: SMSP: Letting the Spectrum Choose, The n-of-m Family: SPEAK and the Rise of Peak Picking

  • 1994
    Demer JL, Honrubia V, Baloh RWDynamic visual acuity: a test for oscillopsia and vestibulo-ocular reflex functionAm J Otol 1994;15(3):340-347; 15(3):340-347
    PMID 8579138demer1994

    Dynamic visual acuity / 3-line Snellen drop at 2 Hz.

    Cited in: The Vestibular Audiogram II: VEMP, Otoliths and Function Tests

  • 1994
    Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NFMyogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflexJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57(2):190-197; 57(2):190-197

    Foundational cVEMP method paper.

    Cited in: The Vestibular Audiogram II: VEMP, Otoliths and Function Tests

  • 1994
    Tyler RSAdvantages and disadvantages expected and reported by cochlear implant patientsAmerican Journal of Otology, 15(4):523-531
    PMID 8588608tyler1994

    Confirmed via Europe PMC, PMID 8588608. Issue number corrected from 15(5) to 15(4); year, journal, volume, and pages match. No DOI available for this 1994 article.

  • 1994
    Zeng FG, Shannon RVLoudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory systemScience

    Key evidence on steep loudness growth and the compressed electric range.

  • 1993
    Recanzone GH, Schreiner CE, Merzenich MMPlasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeysJournal of Neuroscience; 13(1):87–103

    Training enlarges the cortical representation of the trained frequencies — adult plasticity.

    Cited in: Adult plasticity & rehabilitation

  • 1993
    Prezant TR, Agapian JV, Bohlman MC, et al.Mitochondrial ribosomal RNA mutation associated with both antibiotic-induced and non-syndromic deafnessNature Genetics; 4(3):289–294

    The mitochondrial m.1555A>G 12S rRNA variant predisposes to aminoglycoside ototoxicity — relevant where streptomycin/amikacin are used widely (e.g. for tuberculosis).

    Cited in: Noise-induced loss & ototoxicity, Patterns of inheritance

  • 1993
    Schuknecht HF, Gacek MRCochlear pathology in presbycusisThe Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology; 102(1 Pt 2):1–16

    The classic classification of age-related cochlear pathology into sensory, neural, strial (metabolic) and cochlear-conductive subtypes.

    Cited in: Presbycusis — the ageing cochlea

  • 1993
    Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, Alcantara JI, Gerin ES, Seligman PMFormant-based processing for hearing aidsSpeech Communication; 13(3-4):453-461

    MPEAK three high-frequency BPFs (2000-2800/2800-4000/4000-6000 Hz).

    Cited in: Multipeak (MPEAK): Formants Plus High-Frequency Bands

  • 1993
    McDermott HJ, Vandali AE, van Hoesel RJM, McKay CM, Harrison JM, Cohen LTA portable programmable digital sound processor for cochlear implant researchIEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering; 1(2):94-100

    SMSP 6-of-16 implementation details.

    Cited in: Multipeak (MPEAK): Formants Plus High-Frequency Bands, SMSP: Letting the Spectrum Choose

  • 1993
    Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Zerbi MDesign and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implantsJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 30(1), 110-116; 30(1):110-116
    PMID 8263821wilson1993

    Detailed companion to the 1991 Nature paper; source of CA-vs-CIS percent-correct means (n=9).

    Cited in: One Electrode, One Sound: The Single-Channel Era, Compressed Analog: The First Multichannel Waveform Strategy, Continuous Interleaved Sampling: The Pulse That Changed Everything

  • 1993
    Lehnhardt E[Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique]HNO; 41(7):356–359
    PMID 8376183lehnhardt1993

    Original description of cochlear 'soft surgery'.

  • 1993
    Lehnhardt EIntracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery techniqueHNO; 41(7):356-359
    PMID 8376183lehnhardt1993soft

    Original description of the soft-surgery technique (German, HNO 1993 Jul). PMID verified via NCBI.

  • 1992
    Zeng FG, Shannon RVLoudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulationHearing Research; 60(2):231-235

    Loudness/compression mapping for CIS log transform.

  • 1992
    Wightman FL, Kistler DJThe dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localizationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 91(3):1648-1661

    Conflicting-cue virtual-source experiments establishing that broadband sounds containing low frequencies are localized by ITD; supports duplex theory and ITD dominance in module 2.

  • 1992
    Shannon RVTemporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implantsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Defines the low-pass TMTF in implant users with a cutoff in the low hundreds of hertz.

  • 1991
    Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, et alBetter speech recognition with cochlear implantsNature; 352(6332):236–238

    The landmark introduction of continuous interleaved sampling (CIS), the speech-coding breakthrough that produced large gains in speech recognition and underlies modern processors.

    Cited in: The speech-coding breakthrough, CIS — the breakthrough, The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes, The Lineage at a Glance: Why Coding Strategies Keep Changing, One Electrode, One Sound: The Single-Channel Era, Compressed Analog: The First Multichannel Waveform Strategy, Continuous Interleaved Sampling: The Pulse That Changed Everything

  • 1991
    Nadol JB Jr, Hsu WCHistopathologic correlation of spiral ganglion cell count and new bone formation in the cochlea following meningogenic labyrinthitis and deafnessThe Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 100(9):712–716

    Temporal-bone evidence linking meningitis-induced new bone formation (labyrinthitis ossificans) to loss of spiral-ganglion cells — the substrate and timing problem behind post-meningitic implantation.

    Cited in: Meningitis & cochlear ossification, What the temporal bone reveals

  • 1991
    Moore BCJCharacterization and simulation of impaired hearing: implications for hearing aid designEar and Hearing; 12(6 Suppl):154S–161S

    Foundational account of the suprathreshold deficits of impaired hearing — loudness recruitment, reduced frequency and temporal resolution — and why hearing aids cannot reverse them.

    Cited in: Overview — the limits of amplification, Beyond the audiogram, Blurred frequency resolution, Reduced temporal resolution

  • 1991
    Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Finley CC, Wolford RDCoding strategies for multichannel cochlear prosthesesThe American Journal of Otology; 12 Suppl:56-61
    PMID 2069190wilson1991b

    Coding-strategy overview; peak-picking lineage.

  • 1991
    Knutson JF, Hinrichs JV, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Schartz HA, Woodworth GPsychological predictors of audiological outcomes of multichannel cochlear implants: preliminary findingsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 100(10):817-822

    Confirmed via Europe PMC. PMID 1952648 / DOI 10.1177/000348949110001006. Title, year, journal, volume, issue, and pages all match. Author list completed (original used 'et al.').

  • 1991
    Green JD, Marion MS, Hinojosa RLabyrinthitis ossificans: histopathologic consideration for cochlear implantationOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 104(3):320–326

    Histopathology of post-inflammatory cochlear ossification.

  • 1991
    Cohen NL, Hoffman RAComplications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and childrenAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 100(9 Pt 1):708-711

    Foundational classification of CI complications into major (require revision surgery, e.g. flap necrosis, electrode misplacement) vs minor (resolve with conservative care). Reported few major and relatively few minor complications, no deaths.

  • 1990
    Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz BElectrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant usersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 88(3):1385–1391

    Early demonstration of ECAP recording in CI users — the technique's origin.

    Cited in: Overview & rationale, ECAP / Neural Response Telemetry

  • 1990
    Shallop JK, Beiter AL, Goin DW, et al.Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implantEar and Hearing; 11(1):5–15

    eABR waves III/V occur ~1–1.5 ms earlier than acoustic-ABR analogues.

    Cited in: Electrically-evoked ABR

  • 1990
    Greenwood DDA cochlear frequency-position function for several species — 29 years laterJournal of the Acoustical Society of America; 87(6):2592–2605

    The Greenwood place-frequency map relating cochlear position to characteristic frequency.

    Cited in: Overview — the hearing pathway, Cochlear mechanics & tonotopy, The Electrode Array as a Frequency Ruler

  • 1990
    Roe AW, Pallas SL, Hahm JO, Sur MA map of visual space induced in primary auditory cortexScience; 250(4982):818–820

    Rerouted retinal input makes auditory cortex form a visual map — cortex is shaped by its inputs.

    Cited in: Competition & the pluripotent cortex

  • 1990
    Gelfand SA, Schwander T, Silman SAcoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sampleJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders; 55(2):198–205

    Normative acoustic-reflex thresholds by degree of cochlear loss — present reflexes at normal levels argue against a severe sensorineural loss.

    Cited in: The acoustic reflex

  • 1990
    Wiet RJ, Pyle GM, O'Connor CA, et alComputed tomography: how accurate a predictor for cochlear implantation?The Laryngoscope; 100(7):687–692

    Quantified the limits of CT for predicting cochlear patency — false negatives are common, so imaging findings are read with clinical context and complementary MRI.

  • 1990
    Tye-Murray N, Lowder M, Tyler RSComparison of the F0F2 and F0F1F2 processing strategies for the Cochlear Corporation cochlear implantEar and Hearing, 11(3), 195-200; 11(3):195-200

    F0F2 vs F0F1F2 (n=5): NU-6 words 8%->28%, sentences 31%->64%, spondees-in-noise 37%->75%.

    Cited in: Tracking the Voice: F0/F2 Formant Extraction, Adding F1: The F0/F1/F2 Processor

  • 1990
    Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GAThe Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: Psychometric Adequacy and Audiometric CorrelatesEar and Hearing, 11(6):430-433; 11(6):430-433

    Candidate metadata was substantially wrong: author 'Wharton JA' is incorrect (correct co-authors are Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA); journal was 'Seminars in Hearing, 11(4):348-366' (correct Ear and Hearing 11(6):430-433). Confirmed via both Europe PMC PMID and CrossRef DOI.

  • 1990
    Glasberg BR, Moore BCDerivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise dataHearing Research

    Quantifies the sharp frequency selectivity of normal acoustic hearing.

  • 1989
    Nadol JB Jr, Young YS, Glynn RJSurvival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantationAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 98(6):411–416

    Human temporal-bone evidence that spiral-ganglion survival varies with etiology — the anatomical basis for genotype-dependent implant performance.

    Cited in: The spiral-ganglion hypothesis, Predicting the outcome, Imaging in the work-up

  • 1989
    Froberg DG, Kane RLMethodology for measuring health-state preferences--II: Scaling methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(5):459-471

    Confirmed via Europe PMC (EXT_ID:2732774). Issue 5 added.

  • 1988
    Bittles AH, Devi AR, Rao NAConsanguinity, twinning and secondary sex ratio in the population of Karnataka, south IndiaAnnals of Human Biology; 15(6):455–460

    Consanguineous marriage is strongly favoured in parts of south India (mean inbreeding coefficient ~0.03), raising the prevalence of autosomal-recessive disorders including non-syndromic deafness.

    Cited in: Consanguinity & the genetics of deafness

  • 1988
    Boothroyd A, Springer N, Smith L, et alAmplitude compression and profound hearing lossJournal of Speech and Hearing Research; 31(3):362–376

    Source of the formula relating residual dynamic range to degree of loss, and the problem amplitude compression faces in profound hearing loss.

    Cited in: Recruitment & the narrowed dynamic range

  • 1988
    Balkany T, Gantz B, Nadol JB JrMultichannel cochlear implants in partially ossified cochleasAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Supplement; 135:3–7

    Foundational work on implanting the ossified cochlea — the patency grading and drill-out strategies that turn ossification into a surgical-planning problem, not an exclusion.

  • 1988
    Wilson BS, Finley CC, Weber BA, White MW, Farmer JC, Wolford RD, Merzenich MM, Lawson DT, Kenan PD, Schindler RAComparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implantsThe Laryngoscope; 98(10):1069-1077

    n-of-m / peak-picking origins; comparative strategy study.

    Cited in: The n-of-m Family: SPEAK and the Rise of Peak Picking

  • 1988
    Halmagyi GM, Curthoys ISA clinical sign of canal paresisArch Neurol 1988;45(7):737-739; 45(7):737-739

    Original head-thrust (head impulse) bedside sign.

    Cited in: Reading the Dizzy History and the Five-Minute Screen, The Vestibular Audiogram I: Canal Tests Across Frequency

  • 1988
    Gantz BJ, McCabe BF, Tyler RSUse of multichannel cochlear implants in obstructed and obliterated cochleasOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery; 98(1):72–81

    Foundational technique paper on implanting the ossified/obliterated cochlea.

  • 1988
    Holgers KM, Tjellstrom A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BESoft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aidsAmerican Journal of Otology
    PMID 3364537holgers1988soft

    Origin of the Holgers grading scale used to classify abutment skin reactions.

  • 1988
    Pfingst BEComparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implantsHearing Research

    Foundational link between what implant listeners report and what nerve fibres do.

  • 1987
    Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WFCongenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesisThe Laryngoscope; 97(3 Pt 2 Suppl 40):2–14

    The embryogenesis-based classification of inner-ear malformations — deformities as developmental arrests, with CT correlates and arrest weeks; the lineage from which Sennaroglu's scheme grew.

  • 1987
    Jackler RK, Luxford WM, Schindler RA, McKerrow WSCochlear patency problems in cochlear implantationThe Laryngoscope; 97(7 Pt 1):801–805

    An abnormal CT reliably predicts compromised cochlear patency, but a normal scan cannot exclude subtle ossification — the false-negative problem that motivates MRI.

  • 1987
    Blamey PJ, Dowell RC, Clark GM, Seligman PMAcoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implantThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 82(1):38-47

    Source of the F0/F1/F2 formant-processor block diagram.

    Cited in: Tracking the Voice: F0/F2 Formant Extraction, Adding F1: The F0/F1/F2 Processor

  • 1987
    Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RLPitch perception by cochlear implant subjectsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Establishes place and rate as separable percepts in the multidimensional pitch space.

  • 1986
    Torrance GWMeasurement of health state utilities for economic appraisalJournal of Health Economics, 5(1):1-30; 5(1):1-30

    Chapter 18 reference (torrance1986).

  • 1985
    Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, et al.Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cellsScience; 227(4683):194–196

    First demonstration of outer-hair-cell electromotility — the cochlear amplifier.

    Cited in: Overview — the hearing pathway, The cochlear amplifier

  • 1985
    Hudspeth AJThe cellular basis of hearing: the biophysics of hair cellsScience; 230(4727):745–752

    Mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells.

    Cited in: Mechanoelectrical transduction

  • 1984
    Merzenich MM, Nelson RJ, Stryker MP, et al.Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeysJournal of Comparative Neurology; 224(4):591–605

    Adult cortical maps reorganise after amputation — plasticity persists into adulthood.

    Cited in: Adult plasticity & rehabilitation

  • 1984
    Nadol JB JrHistological considerations in implant patientsArchives of Otolaryngology; 110(3):160–163

    Temporal-bone histopathology underpinning imaging interpretation — labyrinthitis ossificans and otosclerosis, and the spiral-ganglion substrate the implant must drive.

  • 1983
    Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJPercepts elicited by different speech-coding strategiesAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences; 405:268-279

    Early speech-coding-strategy percepts (Vienna).

    Cited in: One Electrode, One Sound: The Single-Channel Era

  • 1983
    Nishida Y, Ueda K, Fung KCCongenital rubella syndrome: function of equilibrium of 80 cases with deafnessLaryngoscope 1983;93(7):938-940; 93(7):938-940

    In-utero rubella vestibular involvement.

    Cited in: Who Already Has Vestibular Loss: Etiology and Baseline

  • 1983
    Shannon RVMultichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysicsHearing Research

    Foundational measurements of threshold, comfort and the units of electric stimulation.

  • 1983
    Shannon RVMultichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interactionHearing Research

    Companion paper extending the basic psychophysics to channel effects and levels.

  • 1982
    Liberman MCSingle-neuron labeling in the cat auditory nerveScience; 216(4551):1239–1241

    Auditory-nerve tuning curves and spontaneous-rate classes by single-fibre labelling.

    Cited in: The auditory nerve

  • 1982
    Clark GM, Tong YCA multiple-channel cochlear implant: a summary of results for two patientsArchives of Otolaryngology; 108(4):214–217

    Early multichannel speech-perception results from the Melbourne group, supporting the case that multiple electrodes outperform a single channel.

    Cited in: The single- vs multi-channel debate, The Nucleus Family Tree: From CI22 to CI600

  • 1982
    Brookhouser PE, Cyr DG, Beauchaine KAVestibular findings in the deaf and hard of hearingOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1982;90(6):773-777; 90(6):773-777

    ~50% BVH by caloric in candidates; tandem head-shake Romberg fall rates.

    Cited in: Who Already Has Vestibular Loss: Etiology and Baseline, Reading the Dizzy History and the Five-Minute Screen

  • 1982
    Ventry IM, Weinstein BEThe Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A New ToolEar and Hearing, 3(3):128-134; 3(3):128-134

    All candidate metadata matches the verified record.

  • 1982
    Erber NPAuditory TrainingAlexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf; Washington, DC

    The detection-discrimination-identification-comprehension listening hierarchy.

  • 1980
    Feinberg JThe Child's Right to an Open FutureIn: Aiken W, LaFollette H, eds. Whose Child? Children's Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co
    feinberg1980openfuture

    The foundational philosophical statement of rights-in-trust and the open-future interest.

  • 1979
    Tong YC, Black RC, Clark GM, et alA preliminary report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operationThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology; 93(7):679–695

    The first report of Graeme Clark's Melbourne multiple-channel cochlear implant operation — the lineage that became the Nucleus device.

    Cited in: Graeme Clark & the Nucleus implant

  • 1979
    McCabe BFAutoimmune sensorineural hearing lossThe Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology; 88(5 Pt 1):585–589

    The original description of autoimmune (immune-mediated) sensorineural hearing loss — a rapidly progressive, steroid-responsive cause.

    Cited in: Sudden & autoimmune hearing loss

  • 1978
    Kemp DTStimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory systemJournal of the Acoustical Society of America; 64(5):1386–1391

    Discovery of otoacoustic emissions.

    Cited in: Otoacoustic emissions

  • 1978
    Liberman MCAuditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamberJournal of the Acoustical Society of America; 63(2):442–455

    Spontaneous-rate classes of auditory-nerve fibres and their thresholds/dynamic ranges.

    Cited in: The auditory nerve

  • 1978
    Valvassori GE, Clemis JDThe large vestibular aqueduct syndromeThe Laryngoscope; 88(5):723–728

    Defined the radiologic criterion for an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (>1.5 mm at the midpoint), the most widely used threshold; EVA is linked to SLC26A4/Pendred and carries gusher risk.

  • 1978
    Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JLAuditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in manAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39

    Loudness growth / log compression basis; multichannel origins.

    Cited in: One Electrode, One Sound: The Single-Channel Era

  • 1977
    Bilger RC, Black FO, Hopkinson NTResearch plan for evaluating subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prosthesesAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Supplement; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):21–24

    Part of the NIH-commissioned Bilger evaluation of early single-channel implant recipients, which concluded the devices gave real benefit — lending the field scientific credibility.

    Cited in: The single- vs multi-channel debate

  • 1976
    Kiang NY, Liberman MC, Levine RAAuditory-nerve activity in cats exposed to ototoxic drugs and high-intensity soundsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 85(6 Pt 1):752–768

    Selective outer-hair-cell loss abolishes low-threshold sensitivity and sharp tuning.

    Cited in: The cochlear amplifier

  • 1976
    Jerger J, Hayes DThe cross-check principle in pediatric audiometryArchives of Otolaryngology; 102(10):614–620

    Origin of the cross-check principle — no single audiometric result is accepted without an independent measure of the same function; the organising logic of the whole battery.

    Cited in: The test battery & cross-check, Paediatric behavioural audiometry, Putting the battery together

  • 1974
    Jerger J, Burney P, Mauldin L, Crump BPredicting hearing loss from the acoustic reflexJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders; 39(1):11–22

    Foundational data on the acoustic reflex's sensitivity to conductive loss and its use in predicting sensorineural loss.

    Cited in: The acoustic reflex

  • 1973
    House WF, Urban JLong term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlea in manAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology; 82(4):504–517

    William House and Jack Urban's report on the first wearable single-channel cochlear implants — the device that brought implantation from the laboratory to the patient.

    Cited in: William House & the single-channel implant, The Wider World: Other Manufacturers and the Pioneers' Electrodes

  • 1972
    Spoendlin HInnervation densities of the cochleaActa Oto-Laryngologica; 73(2):235–248

    Type I vs type II afferents; ~95% of afferents contact inner hair cells.

    Cited in: Organ of Corti & hair cells, The auditory nerve

  • 1969
    Goldberg JM, Brown PBResponse of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localizationJournal of Neurophysiology; 32(4):613–636

    Binaural mechanisms of sound localization in the superior olive (ITD/ILD).

    Cited in: Binaural hearing & localization

  • 1968
    Boudreau JC, Tsuchitani CBinaural interaction in the cat superior olive S segmentJournal of Neurophysiology; 31(3):442–454

    Lateral superior olive — excitation/inhibition coding of interaural level differences.

    Cited in: Binaural hearing & localization, Binaural plasticity & bilateral CIs

  • 1967
    Rose JE, Brugge JF, Anderson DJ, et al.Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkeyJournal of Neurophysiology; 30(4):769–793

    Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharge to low-frequency tones.

    Cited in: Coding of frequency & pitch

  • 1966
    Simmons FBElectrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in manArchives of Otolaryngology; 84(1):2–54

    Simmons' Stanford studies directly stimulating the auditory nerve via the modiolus — early evidence that multiple electrodes could evoke distinguishable pitch percepts.

    Cited in: The American multichannel pioneers

  • 1963
    Wiesel TN, Hubel DHSingle-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eyeJournal of Neurophysiology; 26:1003–1017

    The founding demonstration of a critical period via monocular deprivation.

    Cited in: Overview — the plastic brain, Lessons from the visual system

  • 1960
    von Békésy GExperiments in HearingMcGraw-Hill, New York (ASA reprint 1989); Reprint ISBN

    The classic traveling-wave observations; Nobel Prize 1961.

    Cited in: Overview — the hearing pathway, Cochlear mechanics & tonotopy

  • 1957
    Djourno A, Eyriès CProthèse auditive par excitation électrique à distance du nerf sensoriel à l'aide d'un bobinage inclus à demeureLa Presse Médicale; 65(63):1417
    djournoeyries1957

    The 1957 report of the first direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in a human — the origin of the cochlear implant; primary French paper, documented in detail by Eisen 2003.

  • 1952
    Peterson GE, Barney HLControl methods used in a study of the vowelsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America; 24(2):175–184

    Classic study of vowel formant frequencies across talkers.

    Cited in: Sound & acoustics

  • 1930
    Wever EG, Bray CWAction currents in the auditory nerve in response to acoustical stimulationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA; 16(5):344–350

    The volley principle — a population codes the stimulus period when single fibres cannot.

    Cited in: Coding of frequency & pitch