Cochlear Implant Atlas
CI Atlas · The Labyrinth Next Door: Balance and the Cochlear Implant · Module 12

12Falls and the Older Recipient

Older recipients sit at the intersection of presbyvestibulopathy, hearing loss and fall risk, and they are more likely than younger patients to lose vestibular function with surgery. Yet much of their post-op disequilibrium reflects slow re-integration of sensory inputs rather than new labyrinthine signs, and it usually recovers with vestibular rehabilitation. The older recipient is a rehabilitation story as much as a surgical one.

FFalls and hearing loss

About 50% of hearing-loss patients in an audiology clinic fell in the prior 12 months, versus about 25% in the general population If falls occur, particularly in the elderly, outcomes can be fatal Caloric testing reveals elevated rates of bilateral vestibular hypofunction and presbyvestibulopathy among older candidates.[2013]

TAge raises surgical vestibular risk

Older patients are more likely to lose vestibular function after implantation, with reported age thresholds variously above 59, 60 or 70 years Vertigo frequency increases with patient age at surgery Older candidates may already have presbyvestibulopathy, so implanting the better ear risks de novo bilateral loss.[2003][2018]

Who falls — and how age raises the stake

25%general (65+)50%hearing-loss clinic58%CI recipient, age 70

Falls are not a footnote — they are the outcome that matters. Adults attending a hearing-loss clinic already fall at roughly twice the rate of the general older population, and a cochlear implant that removes vestibular function from one ear can add to that, the burden climbing with age. Recognising and rehabilitating vestibular loss in the older recipient is fall prevention, with all that implies for independence and survival. Schematic; representative figures.

TDisequilibrium without new signs

Older patients commonly have persistent disequilibrium WITHOUT new labyrinthine signs, reflecting a lag in re-integrating visual, vestibular and proprioceptive input They usually recover fully with vestibular rehabilitation exercises Residual imbalance persists 1-2 weeks in under 10% of recipients overall.[2004][2012]

FRehabilitation over suppression

Recovery is driven by central vestibular compensation, the brain rebalancing expected input Vestibular suppressants should be used only for acute vertigo and then withdrawn to permit compensation; persistent symptoms warrant referral to vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular rehabilitation has an established evidence base for unilateral peripheral dysfunction and can recover dynamic visual acuity in bilateral hypofunction.[2007][2007]

Recovery is driven by rehabilitation, not rest

full compensationweeks →function

After a vestibular loss the brain re-balances the tonic activity of the two sides — central compensation — and recovers function over weeks. It is an active, movement-dependent process: vestibular rehabilitation and early mobilisation drive it, while prolonged vestibular suppressants and bed rest blunt and delay it, sometimes leaving a lower plateau. So suppressants are for the first day or two only; after that the prescription is movement. Schematic.

Case 24.12 · Falls and the Older Recipient
A 72-year-old reports persistent unsteadiness for several weeks after implantation, but examination shows no nystagmus and no new measurable vestibular deficit.

What is the most appropriate management?

Self-assessment — Module 122 questions
Question 1

Compared with the general population, the prevalence of falls among hearing-loss audiology-clinic patients is approximately:

Question 2

Why should vestibular suppressants be stopped after acute vertigo in an older recipient?

Tracked locally in your browser — see /progress for the dashboard.