Cochlear Implant Atlas
CI Atlas · Hearing Music Through an Implant · Module 10

10Out of Tune: Frequency-to-Place Mismatch

Even an implant that fits speech beautifully can make music sound shifted or sour. The reason is geometry: the processor's frequency table assigns incoming sound bands to electrodes whose tonotopic cochlear address may not match the pitch those bands are supposed to evoke. This module unpacks frequency-to-place mismatch, why it especially corrupts melody and harmony, the across-ear mismatch that troubles bilateral and bimodal users, and the place-based allocation strategies designed to put the notes back where the cochlea expects them.

FTwo maps that should agree but often don't

The cochlea is tonotopic: each place along the basilar membrane has a characteristic frequency, described mathematically by the Greenwood place-frequency function. The processor independently divides the input (roughly 100-8000 Hz) into channels and assigns each to an electrode, optimised for speech intelligibility, not for matching the cochlear place frequency. Frequency-to-place mismatch is the gap between the frequency a channel delivers and the natural characteristic frequency of the cochlear location that channel stimulates. Because arrays usually sit at places whose natural frequencies are no lower than ~500-1500 Hz, low-input bands are delivered to a cochlear region that is naturally tuned much higher - a basalward (upward) shift.[1990][2008][2009]

Where a band should land vs where the array puts it

native placearray deliverstip (20 mm)apex (low)base (high)1000 Hz1168 Hz
Should be heard as1000 HzDelivered as1168 Hz

The cochlea is a frequency map: low pitches belong at the apex, high pitches at the base. A short, shallow array never reaches the apex, so a band whose native place is tuned to about 1000 Hz cannot be delivered there — it is stimulated at a more basal place the brain interprets as a higher frequency. The result is a systematic basalward shift heard as everything sounding sharp or out of tune, worst for the deeper, lower bands and eased by a deeper insertion that lets the array reach the place a frequency truly belongs. Schematic.

TWhy shallow insertion shifts everything sharp

Most arrays reach only the basal and middle turns; the apical, low-frequency region of the cochlea is rarely stimulated, so the lowest input bands land on places naturally tuned to mid-high frequencies. The net effect is that a note is delivered to a place that 'expects' a higher note, so unprocessed percepts can sound shifted upward (sharp) and compressed. Deeper insertion reduces the mismatch by reaching lower-frequency cochlear places, but trades off against insertion trauma and loss of residual hearing. Insertion depth is rarely uniform across the array, so the size of the mismatch can differ from the basal to the apical electrodes within the same ear.[1990][2008][2020]

Greenwood map · insertion depth → lowest frequency reached

201001k10k20k851 Hzbaseapex (35 mm)distance from base (mm) →
Tip reaches851 HzPlace from apex37%

Greenwood’s function maps every position along the cochlear partition to the frequency it is naturally tuned to — from roughly 20 kHz at the base to about 20 Hz at the apex. An electrode array enters at the base and the deepest electrode can only stimulate as far as it reaches: a 22 mm insertion leaves the lowest, most apical frequencies untouched, so the array’s tip delivers a place tuned well above the true bass register. Pushing the marker deeper drops the lowest frequency the array can reach, which is exactly why deeper insertion improves access to low-pitch and musical information. Deterministic Greenwood equation. Schematic.

CHow mismatch corrupts melody and harmony

Melody is a pattern of pitch intervals; a frequency map that is shifted and compressed distorts those intervals, so the contour can be recognised by direction but the exact notes sound wrong. Harmony depends on precise frequency ratios between simultaneous notes; mismatch and channel interaction smear these ratios, so chords lose their consonant/dissonant identity. Across-ear mismatch in bilateral users (the same input band on differently-placed electrodes in each ear) and in bimodal users (electric pitch versus acoustic pitch) can make a single note sound like two different pitches. A familiar song may be identifiable from rhythm and lyrics yet still sound out of tune, which is why patients often say speech 'works' but music 'sounds wrong'.[2014][2005][2008]

A melody’s intervals, true vs distorted

dosolhi dotrue melodyas heard (distorted)note in sequence →
True fifth1.50:1 (3:2)Heard as1.76:1

A melody is recognised by its intervals — the ratios between successive pitches — not its absolute notes. A true perfect fifth is exactly a 3:2 frequency ratio, and as long as every interval keeps its ratio the tune is the same in any key. Frequency-place mismatch through an implant stretches or compresses those ratios unevenly: the green contour is the original, the red is what the warped map delivers. Once the fifth is no longer 3:2 the relationships between notes break down, so the rhythm survives but the melody is heard as out of tune or simply unrecognisable. Deterministic. Illustrative.

CPutting the notes back: adaptation and place-based maps

The brain partially adapts: over months to years, pitch percepts can drift toward the processor's assigned frequencies, so the map increasingly determines pitch more than cochlear place does. Adaptation is often incomplete; some users never fully resolve the mismatch and across-ear differences can persist. Anatomy-based / place-based frequency allocation uses post-operative imaging to estimate each electrode's Greenwood place frequency and assigns input bands to match, reducing mismatch. Place-based fitting shows the clearest promise for music and for binaural consistency, though speech benefits are more variable; it is a key rationale for image-guided programming.[2008][2014][1990][2020]

Case 29.10 · Out of Tune
A 58-year-old post-lingually deafened CI user with a shallow array scores 92% on sentences in quiet and is delighted with speech. Three months on, she reports that familiar songs are recognisable but 'everything sounds a few notes too high and slightly sour,' especially the harmony in a choir.

What best explains her experience?

Self-assessment — Module 103 questions
Question 1

The Greenwood function describes:

Question 2

Why does a shallow electrode array tend to make pitch sound shifted upward (sharp)?

Question 3

Anatomy-based (place-based) frequency allocation works by:

Tracked locally in your browser — see /progress for the dashboard.