Cochlear Implant Atlas
CI Atlas · Beyond Hearing: The Implant for Tinnitus and the Balance System · Module 02

2The Ringing in Silence: Tinnitus in the Deafened Ear

Most severely deaf ears also ring. The phantom sound is born not in the dead cochlea but in a brain straining to hear, turning up its own gain.

FSound from nowhere

Tinnitus is the perception of sound, usually a ringing, hissing or buzzing, when no external source is producing it. The subjective kind that concerns us here is heard only by the patient, distinguishing it from rare objective tinnitus caused by a real internal noise such as turbulent blood flow. It is one of the commonest complaints in ear practice and rises steeply with age and with hearing loss. Far from being a minor curiosity, severe tinnitus is among the most distressing symptoms a patient can carry, precisely because it never stops and cannot be switched off.[2004]

Deafferentation → central gain → phantom sound

cochleainputcentral gain×2.0gainperceived astinnitus 32%
Central gain×2.0Phantom percept32%

When hair-cell loss starves the brain of input (deafferentation), the central auditory system compensates by turning up its gain — and amplifying spontaneous neural activity until it is heard as phantom sound — slide the input down and the tinnitus appears. Crucially, a cochlear implant restores input, which can wind the gain back down: drag the slider back up to watch the tinnitus fade. Schematic.

FWhy deaf ears ring so often

Tinnitus is strikingly common among cochlear implant candidates: across studies, roughly two-thirds to more than eighty percent of people with severe-to-profound hearing loss report it. The central explanation is deafferentation: when the damaged cochlea stops feeding the brain its normal signal, central auditory neurons compensate by turning up their own gain. With less inhibition restraining them, these over-amplified neurons begin to fire in patterns the brain reads as sound, even though nothing is arriving from the ear. This is why tinnitus is generated centrally even when it is triggered peripherally, and why cutting the cochlear nerve does not reliably cure it, and may worsen it. The model has a hopeful corollary: if loss of input drives the gain up, restoring input should be able to bring it back down.[2004][2004]

Tinnitus prevalence: general population vs CI candidates

0255075100% reporting tinnitusGeneral adultsSevere-profound HL
GroupSevere-profound HLLow estimate66%High estimate86%

In the general adult population tinnitus is reported by roughly 10–15%. Among adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss — the people considered for a cochlear implant — that figure leaps to about 66–86%. The near five-fold jump is why tinnitus is treated as a default feature of the candidate, not an incidental finding. Illustrative.

CThe cost of a sound that never stops

Bothersome tinnitus erodes sleep, breaks concentration, and is tightly linked to anxiety, low mood and reduced quality of life. For some deaf patients the ringing is the dominant complaint, more disabling than the loss of hearing itself. Because the distress is psychological as much as sensory, two people with identical loudness can report wildly different handicap. This gap between measured loudness and lived suffering is exactly why we need handicap questionnaires, not loudness alone, to capture the burden.[1996]

Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: score → grade

Slight016Mild1836Moderate3856Severe5876Catastrophic781004242 / 100 → Moderate handicap
Items25Range0–100GradeModerate

The THI asks 25 questions, each scored 0, 2 or 4, for a total of 0–100. That total maps onto five graded bands — slight (0–16), mild (18–36), moderate (38–56), severe (58–76) and catastrophic (78–100). Tracking the score before and after implantation is how a clinician shows, in numbers, whether the device quietened the tinnitus. Illustrative.

TPutting a number on a phantom

Psychoacoustic matching estimates the tinnitus by asking the patient to match its pitch and to balance an external tone to its loudness. Loudness and pitch matches reveal that most tinnitus sits in the high frequencies, mirroring the region of greatest hearing loss. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, a 25-item questionnaire scored from 0 to 100, is the most widely used measure of how much the tinnitus actually disrupts life. Simple visual analogue scales, where the patient marks loudness or annoyance on a 0-to-10 line, give a quick repeatable read for tracking change after treatment. Using the same tools before and after implantation is what lets us prove the device truly quietened the ringing rather than the patient merely getting used to it.[1996]

Case 30.2 · The Ringing in Silence
A 45-year-old woman with profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss in one ear is overwhelmed by a loud ringing on that side. Her surgeon proposes implanting that ear partly to address the tinnitus. A colleague worries that, because the ear is dead, the ringing must come from the ear and so the brain cannot be the source.

How should the central-gain model answer the colleague's worry?

Self-assessment — Module 23 questions
Question 1

According to the central-gain model, what produces tinnitus after hearing loss?

Question 2

Roughly how common is tinnitus among people with severe-to-profound hearing loss?

Question 3

Which tool best captures how much tinnitus disrupts a patient's life rather than just its loudness?

Tracked locally in your browser — see /progress for the dashboard.