Cochlear Implant Atlas
CI Atlas · On the Horizon: Emerging Technology · Module 07

7Nothing on the Outside: The Totally Implantable Implant

Every cochlear implant today still leaves something on the head: a coil, a magnet, a processor behind the ear. The totally implantable cochlear implant aims to put all of it under the skin so that hearing is simply always there. The vision is compelling and the prototypes exist, but three hard problems keep it investigational.

FWhat 'totally implantable' actually means

A totally implantable cochlear implant (TICI) buries every functional block under the skin: microphone, sound processor, battery and electrode array, with nothing worn externally. This is distinct from today's devices, which are partly implanted (receiver-stimulator and array internal) but depend on an external behind-the-ear or off-the-ear processor plus a transcutaneous coil. An intermediate step is the 'invisible-but-chargeable' design: internal mic, processor and battery for everyday use, with an external coil worn only to recharge the implant and to upload new settings. The TIKI research device demonstrated this directly with two modes - an external hearing mode using a conventional processor, and an invisible hearing mode running entirely on the internal microphone and battery.[2008][2017]

External vs totally implantable

outside (external)inside (implanted)MicrophoneProcessorBatteryReceiver + arrayalways implanted3 external blocks
External parts3Implanted parts1

Today’s implant splits into three external blocks — microphone, processor and battery — worn on the head and coupled to the internal receiver and array. A totally implantable design pulls all three under the skin, leaving zero external parts: no visible device, no daily donning, swimming and sleeping with hearing intact. The price is solving how to hear, power and service a sealed device. Schematic.

CWhy patients want it: always-on hearing without the device

Always-on hearing means sound during the moments current users miss most - waking, sleeping, swimming, showering and the seconds before the processor is put on in the morning. Removing the external piece removes a visible marker of deafness; reduced stigma is a recurring reason candidates and families give for wanting an invisible device. No external hardware means no daily on/off routine, no parts to lose or damage, and no water/dust vulnerability at the worn site - relevant for young children and active adults. In the TICI feasibility study, recipients chose to use invisible-hearing mode for a median of about half their listening time (range 22-88%), showing real-world appetite for processor-free hearing even when an external option was available.[2025][2008]

Invisible-hearing-mode use (feasibility cohort, n=10)

0255075100% listening timeR1R2R3R4R5R6R7R8R9R10
RecipientR10Invisible-hearing use88%

In an early totally-implantable feasibility study, recipients used the fully-internal invisible-hearing mode for ~22% to ~88% of their listening time (median ~49%). It works, but most still switched to the external processor for demanding listening — so the invisible mode is a complement, not yet a replacement. Tap a bar to read its value. Illustrative.

TThe three hard problems

Problem one - the microphone: a sensor under the skin is damped by overlying tissue and picks up chewing, footfall and the user's own voice, degrading the sound it captures (covered in detail in the next module). Problem two - power: an implanted battery must run continuously yet be small, sealed, and rechargeable for years; transcutaneous charging and very-low-power electronics are the practical near-term answer, with energy harvesting still preclinical. Problem three - serviceability and upgradability: sealing everything inside means software, microphone and battery cannot be swapped at a clinic visit the way an external processor can, so the implant must outlast many processor generations or be re-operable. These three couple together - a noisier internal mic needs more processing, which costs more power, which strains the sealed battery - so a TICI is an integrated trade-off rather than three independent gadgets.[2018][2017][2012]

Three hard problems of a sealed implant

BarrierStatusMicrophoneUnsolvedPowerPartialServiceabilityUnsolved

Microphone: A sensor under the skin picks up body and chewing noise; failures in a feasibility cohort traced to microphone-seal issues.

A totally implantable CI must solve three problems at once: hearing with a buried microphone, powering a sealed device, and servicing it without external access. All three remain open — in an early feasibility cohort the microphone seal was the dominant failure mode, because a subcutaneous mic must reject body and chewing noise while staying watertight for years. Tap a barrier to see why. Schematic.

CWhere it stands today

TICI remains investigational: first-in-human work and a recent ten-adult feasibility study show it can work, but no totally implantable CI is in routine clinical use. The recent feasibility study also exposed the reliability gap - two of ten devices failed from a microphone-related hermeticity (sealing) problem, the kind of failure that is trivial with an external mic and serious with an internal one. Clinic-now reality: every commercial implant still uses an external processor; the honest counselling message is that invisible hearing is a credible research direction, not a product a patient can be offered today. The likely path is incremental - invisible-but-chargeable hybrids first, full independence later - rather than a single leap to a sealed, never-serviced device.[2025][2017]

Case 26.7 · Nothing on the Outside
A 34-year-old competitive swimmer with bilateral profound hearing loss asks whether she can get an implant with 'nothing on the outside' so she can hear in the pool and while sleeping. She has read about a totally implantable device.

What is the most accurate counselling statement?

Self-assessment — Module 73 questions
Question 1

Which component is internal in a conventional cochlear implant but would additionally need to be internal in a totally implantable device?

Question 2

In the 'invisible-but-chargeable' intermediate design, what is the external coil used for?

Question 3

Which of the following best describes the current clinical status of totally implantable cochlear implants?

Tracked locally in your browser — see /progress for the dashboard.